Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus amendments on CO2 and CH4 production in peat soils of Scotty Creek, Northwest Territories: potential considerations for wildfire and permafrost thaw impacts on peatland carbon exchanges

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.5194/soil-11-309-2025
Eunji Byun, Fereidoun Rezanezhad, Stephanie Slowinski, Christina Lam, Saraswati Bhusal, Stephanie Wright, William L. Quinton, Kara L. Webster, Philippe Van Cappellen
{"title":"Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus amendments on CO2 and CH4 production in peat soils of Scotty Creek, Northwest Territories: potential considerations for wildfire and permafrost thaw impacts on peatland carbon exchanges","authors":"Eunji Byun, Fereidoun Rezanezhad, Stephanie Slowinski, Christina Lam, Saraswati Bhusal, Stephanie Wright, William L. Quinton, Kara L. Webster, Philippe Van Cappellen","doi":"10.5194/soil-11-309-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Impacts of nutrient enrichment on soil carbon cycling have been extensively studied in temperate and tropical regions where intensive agriculture and land development has led to large increases in anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). However, how soil carbon sequestration and soil–atmosphere gas exchanges in cold regions respond to greater inputs of N and P remains poorly known despite recent observations showing significant increases in porewater N and P in burned subarctic peatlands and downstream waters. Wildfires and enhanced hydrological connectivity due to permafrost thaw therefore have the potential to change carbon turnover and gas emissions in the soils of northern peatlands. To start exploring the sensitivity of peatland soil biogeochemistry to variations in N and P availability, we measured the carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) production rates during a month-long incubation experiment with soils from a bog and fen collected at the long-term Scotty Creek research station in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Sub-samples of the peatland soils were divided into containers to which artificial porewater solutions were added. These solutions were amended with either dissolved inorganic N, dissolved inorganic P, or dissolved N and P together. Unamended controls were run in parallel. The containers were cycled through pre-set temperature steps of 1, 5, 15, and 25 °C. Overall, the fen soil yielded higher CO2 and CH4 production rates than the bog soil. The amendment of N in the bog soil produced more CO2 compared to its control, while the amendment of P increased CO2 production in the fen soil. The amendment of N and P together reduced CO2 production but increased that of CH4 in both the fen and bog soil incubations. Porewater chemistry at the end of the 30 d experiment showed aqueous C, N, and P stoichiometric ratios that trended toward those of the soil microbial biomasses, hence implying that the initial microbial nutrient status played a crucial role in determining the responses to the different nutrient amendments. Our results demonstrate that porewater nutrient availability and soil carbon cycling interact in complex ways to change CO2 and CH4 production rates in peatland soils, with potentially far-reaching implications for the impacts of wildfires and permafrost thaw on peatland–atmosphere carbon exchanges.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-309-2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Impacts of nutrient enrichment on soil carbon cycling have been extensively studied in temperate and tropical regions where intensive agriculture and land development has led to large increases in anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). However, how soil carbon sequestration and soil–atmosphere gas exchanges in cold regions respond to greater inputs of N and P remains poorly known despite recent observations showing significant increases in porewater N and P in burned subarctic peatlands and downstream waters. Wildfires and enhanced hydrological connectivity due to permafrost thaw therefore have the potential to change carbon turnover and gas emissions in the soils of northern peatlands. To start exploring the sensitivity of peatland soil biogeochemistry to variations in N and P availability, we measured the carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) production rates during a month-long incubation experiment with soils from a bog and fen collected at the long-term Scotty Creek research station in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Sub-samples of the peatland soils were divided into containers to which artificial porewater solutions were added. These solutions were amended with either dissolved inorganic N, dissolved inorganic P, or dissolved N and P together. Unamended controls were run in parallel. The containers were cycled through pre-set temperature steps of 1, 5, 15, and 25 °C. Overall, the fen soil yielded higher CO2 and CH4 production rates than the bog soil. The amendment of N in the bog soil produced more CO2 compared to its control, while the amendment of P increased CO2 production in the fen soil. The amendment of N and P together reduced CO2 production but increased that of CH4 in both the fen and bog soil incubations. Porewater chemistry at the end of the 30 d experiment showed aqueous C, N, and P stoichiometric ratios that trended toward those of the soil microbial biomasses, hence implying that the initial microbial nutrient status played a crucial role in determining the responses to the different nutrient amendments. Our results demonstrate that porewater nutrient availability and soil carbon cycling interact in complex ways to change CO2 and CH4 production rates in peatland soils, with potentially far-reaching implications for the impacts of wildfires and permafrost thaw on peatland–atmosphere carbon exchanges.
氮和磷添加剂对西北地区 Scotty Creek 泥炭土中二氧化碳和甲烷产生的影响:野火和永久冻土融化对泥炭地碳交换影响的潜在考虑因素
摘要。在温带和热带地区,人们已经广泛研究了养分富集对土壤碳循环的影响,在这些地区,集约化农业和土地开发导致了人为氮(N)和磷(P)输入的大量增加。尽管最近的观测显示亚北极燃烧泥炭地和下游水域孔隙水N和P显著增加,但寒冷地区的土壤碳固存和土壤-大气气体交换如何响应更大的N和P输入仍知之甚少。因此,野火和因永久冻土融化而增强的水文连通性有可能改变北部泥炭地土壤中的碳周转和气体排放。为了开始探索泥炭地土壤生物地球化学对N和P有效性变化的敏感性,我们在加拿大西北地区长期Scotty Creek研究站收集的沼泽和沼泽土壤进行了为期一个月的孵化实验,测量了二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)的产生速率。泥炭地土壤的亚样品被分成容器,其中添加了人工孔隙水溶液。在这些溶液中加入溶解的无机N、溶解的无机P或溶解的N和P。未修改的控制并行运行。容器通过预先设定的1、5、15和25°C的温度步骤循环。总体而言,沼泽土壤的CO2和CH4生产速率高于沼泽土壤。在沼泽土壤中,N的修正比对照产生更多的CO2,而在沼泽土壤中,P的修正增加了CO2的产生。N和P的修正共同降低了沼泽和沼泽土壤的CO2产量,但增加了CH4的产量。30 d试验结束时孔隙水化学表明,水体中C、N、P的化学计量比与土壤微生物生物量的化学计量比趋于一致,表明初始微生物营养状况在决定不同养分修正的响应中起着至关重要的作用。我们的研究结果表明,孔隙水养分有效性和土壤碳循环以复杂的方式相互作用,改变了泥炭地土壤中CO2和CH4的产生速率,对野火和永久冻土融化对泥炭地-大气碳交换的影响具有潜在的深远意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信