Nationwide Assessment of Pulmonary Function Testing Practices and Safety Compliance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Aslı Görek Dilektasli, Şermin Börekçi, Öznur Akkoca Yıldız, Bilun Gemicioğlu, Cüneyt Saltürk, Sevgi Behiye Saryal, Gaye Ulubay
{"title":"Nationwide Assessment of Pulmonary Function Testing Practices and Safety Compliance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Aslı Görek Dilektasli, Şermin Börekçi, Öznur Akkoca Yıldız, Bilun Gemicioğlu, Cüneyt Saltürk, Sevgi Behiye Saryal, Gaye Ulubay","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-1-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) presented considerable challenges to health services, particularly for a routine assessment method, the pulmonary function tests (PFTs), which can generate aerosols and require sharing common surfaces. Despite these risks, there is a need to continue testing, especially for vulnerable patient groups.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted from June 1 to June 26, 2020, to assess pulmonologists' practices regarding PFTs before and during the pandemic's first peak in Türkiye (March 11-May 20, 2020). The survey included 30 anonymized questions and received ethical committee approval. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences statistical package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and forty-three respondents across 59 cities participated in the study. 93% were pulmonologists. 77.4% of PFT labs have adequate ventilation by having a window enabling room direct air exchange. 27.2% of the PFT labs continued testing during the first peak of the pandemic. 83.3% of the responding centers applied triage before testing. Ongoing tests included spirometry (100%), bronchodilator reversibility testing (62.1%), and carbon-monoxide diffusion testing (16.7%). 49% of the PFT labs conducted fewer than four tests daily, while 21.2% performed more than eight. PFT technicians used personal protective equipment, with 67.7% using eye protection and 75.3 % wearing FFP3 or FFP2 masks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey found that pulmonologists have acted quickly and made moderate success in making preparations in PFT labs for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, safer practice in PFT units still needs to be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-1-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) presented considerable challenges to health services, particularly for a routine assessment method, the pulmonary function tests (PFTs), which can generate aerosols and require sharing common surfaces. Despite these risks, there is a need to continue testing, especially for vulnerable patient groups.

Material and methods: An online survey was conducted from June 1 to June 26, 2020, to assess pulmonologists' practices regarding PFTs before and during the pandemic's first peak in Türkiye (March 11-May 20, 2020). The survey included 30 anonymized questions and received ethical committee approval. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences statistical package.

Results: Two hundred and forty-three respondents across 59 cities participated in the study. 93% were pulmonologists. 77.4% of PFT labs have adequate ventilation by having a window enabling room direct air exchange. 27.2% of the PFT labs continued testing during the first peak of the pandemic. 83.3% of the responding centers applied triage before testing. Ongoing tests included spirometry (100%), bronchodilator reversibility testing (62.1%), and carbon-monoxide diffusion testing (16.7%). 49% of the PFT labs conducted fewer than four tests daily, while 21.2% performed more than eight. PFT technicians used personal protective equipment, with 67.7% using eye protection and 75.3 % wearing FFP3 or FFP2 masks.

Conclusion: The survey found that pulmonologists have acted quickly and made moderate success in making preparations in PFT labs for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, safer practice in PFT units still needs to be implemented.

COVID-19大流行期间全国肺功能检测实践和安全合规性评估
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)给卫生服务带来了相当大的挑战,特别是对于常规评估方法,即肺功能测试(pft),该方法可能产生气溶胶并且需要共用表面。尽管存在这些风险,但仍有必要继续进行检测,特别是对弱势患者群体。材料和方法:2020年6月1日至6月26日进行了一项在线调查,以评估肺科医生在疫情首次高峰(2020年3月11日至5月20日)之前和期间关于pft的做法。该调查包括30个匿名问题,并得到了伦理委员会的批准。使用IBM社会科学统计软件包的统计软件包进行统计分析。结果:来自59个城市的243名受访者参与了这项研究。93%是肺科医生。77.4%的PFT实验室有足够的通风,设有可直接交换空气的窗户。27.2%的PFT实验室在大流行的第一个高峰期间继续进行检测。83.3%的响应中心在检测前进行分流。正在进行的试验包括肺活量测定(100%)、支气管扩张剂可逆性试验(62.1%)和一氧化碳扩散试验(16.7%)。49%的PFT实验室每天进行的检测少于4次,而21.2%的实验室每天进行的检测超过8次。PFT技术人员使用个人防护装备,67.7%使用护眼设备,75.3%佩戴FFP3或FFP2口罩。结论:调查发现,肺科医生在PFT实验室准备COVID-19大流行方面行动迅速,取得了一定的成功。尽管如此,在PFT装置中仍然需要实施更安全的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信