Robotic assisted left atrial appendage occlusion: an important complementary option in the surgical management of atrial fibrillation.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alfonso Agnino, Laura Giroletti, Eduardo Celentano, Ascanio Graniero, Ernesto Cristiano, Matteo Parrinello, Giovanni Albano, Mario Gasparri, Stefano Schena
{"title":"Robotic assisted left atrial appendage occlusion: an important complementary option in the surgical management of atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Alfonso Agnino, Laura Giroletti, Eduardo Celentano, Ascanio Graniero, Ernesto Cristiano, Matteo Parrinello, Giovanni Albano, Mario Gasparri, Stefano Schena","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The growing popularity of minimally invasive treatment of AF has shown increasing interest in concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Surgical robotic technology adds advantages such as magnified visualization, enhanced dexterity of movement and decreased invasiveness. Aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and early outcomes of robotic-assisted LAAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational, multicentre, retrospective study of patients with AF who underwent robotic-assisted LAAO. In-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, LOS and imaging-driven (cardiac CT scan, TEE) efficacy at 3-month follow-up were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 2019 and June 2024, 194 patients with documented AF (70.4% male, mean age 67.7 ± 10.1) underwent robotic-assisted epicardial LAAO. The procedure was performed under transoesophageal-echocardiography guidance in 193 patients without complications. In one patient with previous sternotomy, LAAO was not feasible. Blood products transfusion was necessary in one patient, due to significant chest wall bleeding requiring thoracoscopic re-exploration. No stroke or thromboembolic events were observed. Left hemidiaphragm paralysis requiring plication occurred in 3 pts (1.5%). Hospital mortality was 0%. Mean LOS time was 2.2 days (range 1-10 days) and all patients were discharged home. Imaging follow-up was complete in 157 cases (81%) and was achieved by TEE in 91 patients while the remaining 66 underwent cardiac CT scan. Two patients had residual flow in the left atrial appendage and OAC was continued at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted LAAO is safe with satisfactory outcome both in an isolated setting and with concomitant hybrid ablating procedures for patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The growing popularity of minimally invasive treatment of AF has shown increasing interest in concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Surgical robotic technology adds advantages such as magnified visualization, enhanced dexterity of movement and decreased invasiveness. Aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and early outcomes of robotic-assisted LAAO.

Methods: This is an observational, multicentre, retrospective study of patients with AF who underwent robotic-assisted LAAO. In-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, LOS and imaging-driven (cardiac CT scan, TEE) efficacy at 3-month follow-up were analyzed.

Results: Between August 2019 and June 2024, 194 patients with documented AF (70.4% male, mean age 67.7 ± 10.1) underwent robotic-assisted epicardial LAAO. The procedure was performed under transoesophageal-echocardiography guidance in 193 patients without complications. In one patient with previous sternotomy, LAAO was not feasible. Blood products transfusion was necessary in one patient, due to significant chest wall bleeding requiring thoracoscopic re-exploration. No stroke or thromboembolic events were observed. Left hemidiaphragm paralysis requiring plication occurred in 3 pts (1.5%). Hospital mortality was 0%. Mean LOS time was 2.2 days (range 1-10 days) and all patients were discharged home. Imaging follow-up was complete in 157 cases (81%) and was achieved by TEE in 91 patients while the remaining 66 underwent cardiac CT scan. Two patients had residual flow in the left atrial appendage and OAC was continued at follow-up.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted LAAO is safe with satisfactory outcome both in an isolated setting and with concomitant hybrid ablating procedures for patients with AF.

机器人辅助左心房附件闭塞:一个重要的补充选择,在外科治疗心房颤动。
目的:心房颤动微创治疗的日益普及,表明了对合并左心耳闭塞(LAAO)的兴趣日益增加。手术机器人技术增加了诸如放大可视化、增强运动灵活性和减少侵入性等优势。本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助LAAO的有效性和早期结果。方法:这是一项观察性、多中心、回顾性研究,研究对象是接受机器人辅助LAAO治疗的房颤患者。随访3个月,分析住院死亡率、围手术期并发症、LOS和影像驱动(心脏CT扫描,TEE)疗效。结果:2019年8月至2024年6月期间,194例AF患者(70.4%为男性,平均年龄67.7±10.1岁)接受了机器人辅助心外膜LAAO。193例患者在经食管超声心动图指导下进行手术,无并发症。1例既往胸骨切开术患者,LAAO不可行。1例患者因明显胸壁出血需要再次胸腔镜检查,输血是必要的。未观察到卒中或血栓栓塞事件。3例(1.5%)患者出现左膈瘫痪。医院死亡率为0%。平均LOS时间为2.2天(范围1-10天),所有患者均出院回家。影像学随访157例(81%),TEE随访91例,CT随访66例。2例患者左心耳有残余血流,随访时继续进行OAC。结论:对于房颤患者,机器人辅助LAAO是安全的,无论是在孤立的环境中还是在混合消融手术中都有令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信