Applications of the SpineJack device in the surgical management of type A4 lumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: illustrative cases.

Giorgio Cracchiolo, Stefano Ticca, Nicholas Giulio Raccagni, Emanuele Costi, Angela Dele Rampini, Luigi Alberto Andrea Lanterna, Andrea Fanti
{"title":"Applications of the SpineJack device in the surgical management of type A4 lumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: illustrative cases.","authors":"Giorgio Cracchiolo, Stefano Ticca, Nicholas Giulio Raccagni, Emanuele Costi, Angela Dele Rampini, Luigi Alberto Andrea Lanterna, Andrea Fanti","doi":"10.3171/CASE24821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type A4 lumbar burst fractures are severe spinal injuries typically treated with posterior pedicle screw constructs, with or without corpectomy. However, traditional approaches can be highly invasive and are often limited in their ability to reconstruct the anterior column. The SpineJack device offers a minimally invasive alternative or complement to posterior fixation.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Four neurologically intact patients with lumbar type A4 fractures were treated using the SpineJack device, either alone or in combination with different posterior fixation techniques. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up. The procedure led to significant pain relief and rapid mobilization for all patients. Radiologically, it restored vertebral body height (VBH), increased spinal canal patency, and corrected preoperative deformities, with minimal loss of correction at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>The SpineJack device is a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional pedicle screw constructs and serves as an effective adjunct for stabilization, potentially replacing corpectomy in some cases. It restores VBH and alignment, maintains load-bearing capacity, and reduces the need for additional hardware. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes, especially in younger patients. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24821.</p>","PeriodicalId":94098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","volume":"9 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE24821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type A4 lumbar burst fractures are severe spinal injuries typically treated with posterior pedicle screw constructs, with or without corpectomy. However, traditional approaches can be highly invasive and are often limited in their ability to reconstruct the anterior column. The SpineJack device offers a minimally invasive alternative or complement to posterior fixation.

Observations: Four neurologically intact patients with lumbar type A4 fractures were treated using the SpineJack device, either alone or in combination with different posterior fixation techniques. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up. The procedure led to significant pain relief and rapid mobilization for all patients. Radiologically, it restored vertebral body height (VBH), increased spinal canal patency, and corrected preoperative deformities, with minimal loss of correction at follow-up.

Lessons: The SpineJack device is a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional pedicle screw constructs and serves as an effective adjunct for stabilization, potentially replacing corpectomy in some cases. It restores VBH and alignment, maintains load-bearing capacity, and reduces the need for additional hardware. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes, especially in younger patients. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24821.

SpineJack装置在无神经功能缺损的A4型腰椎爆裂性骨折手术治疗中的应用:说明性病例
背景:A4型腰椎爆裂骨折是严重的脊柱损伤,通常采用后路椎弓根螺钉结构治疗,伴或不伴椎体切除术。然而,传统的入路可能是高度侵入性的,并且通常在重建前柱的能力上受到限制。SpineJack装置为后路固定提供了一种微创替代或补充。观察:4例神经完整的A4型腰椎骨折患者使用SpineJack装置单独或联合不同的后路固定技术进行治疗。术前、术后和1年随访时评估临床和影像学结果。该手术显著缓解了所有患者的疼痛,并使患者能够快速活动。放射学上,它恢复了椎体高度(VBH),增加了椎管通畅,矫正了术前畸形,在随访中矫正的损失最小。经验:与传统椎弓根螺钉结构相比,SpineJack装置是一种可行的、侵入性较小的替代方案,可作为稳定椎弓根螺钉的有效辅助装置,在某些情况下可能取代椎体切除术。它恢复了VBH和对准,保持了承载能力,并减少了对额外硬件的需求。需要进一步的研究来评估长期结果,特别是在年轻患者中。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24821。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信