[Correlation between stimulation levels und ECAP thresholds for audiometry-based fitting of cochlear implants. German version].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Hno Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s00106-025-01584-6
Annett Franke-Trieger, Thomas Hocke, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach
{"title":"[Correlation between stimulation levels und ECAP thresholds for audiometry-based fitting of cochlear implants. German version].","authors":"Annett Franke-Trieger, Thomas Hocke, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach","doi":"10.1007/s00106-025-01584-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons whose speech recognition with hearing aids at 65 dB<sub>SPL</sub>, WRS<sub>65</sub>(HA), is inadequate but whose maximum monosyllabic word recognition score (WRS<sub>max</sub>) is still measurable may benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). Using a validated prediction model, one can estimate word recognition with a CI, WRS<sub>65</sub>(CI), for these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) and stimulation parameters of the CI system.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 37 patients were included. The WRS<sub>65</sub>(CI) was determined after 6 and 12 months and compared with the predicted WRS<sub>65</sub>(CI). The correlation of minimum and maximum electrical stimulation with the ECAP was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients showed a significantly better WRS<sub>65</sub>(CI) after 12 months compared with the preoperatively determined WRS<sub>65</sub>(HA). The proportion of patients whose WRS<sub>65</sub>(CI) fell short of the predicted value by more than 20 percentage points was 19% after 6 months and 5% after 12 months. In the patient population, there was a closer correlation of the ECAP thresholds with the maximum than with the minimum electrical stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients whose speech understanding with hearing aids is inadequate-even with a very high preoperative WRS<sub>max</sub> in moderately severe hearing loss-CI fitting appears to be a promising treatment option. The predictive model enables individual treatment planning. Its application contributed to a quality of care that was higher than was found in an earlier retrospective study. The correlation found between stimulation intensity and ECAP in a cohort of patients with achieved predicted values supports the hypothesis that a fitting procedure based on ECAP and audiometry is a promising approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":55052,"journal":{"name":"Hno","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hno","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-025-01584-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persons whose speech recognition with hearing aids at 65 dBSPL, WRS65(HA), is inadequate but whose maximum monosyllabic word recognition score (WRSmax) is still measurable may benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). Using a validated prediction model, one can estimate word recognition with a CI, WRS65(CI), for these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) and stimulation parameters of the CI system.

Patients and methods: In this prospective study, 37 patients were included. The WRS65(CI) was determined after 6 and 12 months and compared with the predicted WRS65(CI). The correlation of minimum and maximum electrical stimulation with the ECAP was investigated.

Results: All patients showed a significantly better WRS65(CI) after 12 months compared with the preoperatively determined WRS65(HA). The proportion of patients whose WRS65(CI) fell short of the predicted value by more than 20 percentage points was 19% after 6 months and 5% after 12 months. In the patient population, there was a closer correlation of the ECAP thresholds with the maximum than with the minimum electrical stimulation.

Conclusion: For patients whose speech understanding with hearing aids is inadequate-even with a very high preoperative WRSmax in moderately severe hearing loss-CI fitting appears to be a promising treatment option. The predictive model enables individual treatment planning. Its application contributed to a quality of care that was higher than was found in an earlier retrospective study. The correlation found between stimulation intensity and ECAP in a cohort of patients with achieved predicted values supports the hypothesis that a fitting procedure based on ECAP and audiometry is a promising approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hno
Hno 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: HNO is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all ENT specialists in practices and clinics dealing with all aspects of ENT medicine, e.g. prevention, diagnostic methods, complication management, modern therapy strategies and surgical procedures. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of ENT medicine. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信