Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

IF 63.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carrie D Patnode, Caitlyn A Senger, Erin L Coppola, Megan O Iacocca
{"title":"Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.","authors":"Carrie D Patnode, Caitlyn A Senger, Erin L Coppola, Megan O Iacocca","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.27267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Interventions to support breastfeeding may help individuals and families initiate breastfeeding or breastfeed exclusively or for a prolonged period of time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2016 recommendation.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Studies included in the previous review were reevaluated for inclusion and updated searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through June 3, 2024. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications through January 24, 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials that evaluated a primary care-relevant intervention designed to support breastfeeding. Of 290 full-text articles reviewed, 90 met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Child and maternal health outcomes, prevalence, and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety trials (N = 49 597) reported in 125 publications were included. The evidence represented individuals from diverse backgrounds and interventions that varied in timing, delivery, and duration. There was limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions on infant health outcomes (10 trials [n = 6592]) and maternal symptoms of anxiety, depression, and well-being (9 trials [n = 2334]). Pooled analyses indicated beneficial associations between breastfeeding support interventions and any or exclusive breastfeeding for up to and at 6 months (any breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; 37 trials [n = 13 579] and exclusive breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78]; 37 trials [n = 14 398]). There was no relationship between interventions and breastfeeding initiation or breastfeeding at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions can increase the prevalence of any or exclusive breastfeeding up to and at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on how to best provide this support consistently for all individuals making feeding decisions for their infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":63.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Interventions to support breastfeeding may help individuals and families initiate breastfeeding or breastfeed exclusively or for a prolonged period of time.

Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2016 recommendation.

Data sources: Studies included in the previous review were reevaluated for inclusion and updated searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through June 3, 2024. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications through January 24, 2025.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials that evaluated a primary care-relevant intervention designed to support breastfeeding. Of 290 full-text articles reviewed, 90 met inclusion criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another.

Main outcomes and measures: Child and maternal health outcomes, prevalence, and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions.

Results: Ninety trials (N = 49 597) reported in 125 publications were included. The evidence represented individuals from diverse backgrounds and interventions that varied in timing, delivery, and duration. There was limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions on infant health outcomes (10 trials [n = 6592]) and maternal symptoms of anxiety, depression, and well-being (9 trials [n = 2334]). Pooled analyses indicated beneficial associations between breastfeeding support interventions and any or exclusive breastfeeding for up to and at 6 months (any breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; 37 trials [n = 13 579] and exclusive breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78]; 37 trials [n = 14 398]). There was no relationship between interventions and breastfeeding initiation or breastfeeding at 12 months.

Conclusions and relevance: The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions can increase the prevalence of any or exclusive breastfeeding up to and at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on how to best provide this support consistently for all individuals making feeding decisions for their infants.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信