Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

IF 63.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carrie D Patnode, Caitlyn A Senger, Erin L Coppola, Megan O Iacocca
{"title":"Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.","authors":"Carrie D Patnode, Caitlyn A Senger, Erin L Coppola, Megan O Iacocca","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.27267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Interventions to support breastfeeding may help individuals and families initiate breastfeeding or breastfeed exclusively or for a prolonged period of time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2016 recommendation.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Studies included in the previous review were reevaluated for inclusion and updated searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through June 3, 2024. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications through January 24, 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials that evaluated a primary care-relevant intervention designed to support breastfeeding. Of 290 full-text articles reviewed, 90 met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Child and maternal health outcomes, prevalence, and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety trials (N = 49 597) reported in 125 publications were included. The evidence represented individuals from diverse backgrounds and interventions that varied in timing, delivery, and duration. There was limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions on infant health outcomes (10 trials [n = 6592]) and maternal symptoms of anxiety, depression, and well-being (9 trials [n = 2334]). Pooled analyses indicated beneficial associations between breastfeeding support interventions and any or exclusive breastfeeding for up to and at 6 months (any breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; 37 trials [n = 13 579] and exclusive breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78]; 37 trials [n = 14 398]). There was no relationship between interventions and breastfeeding initiation or breastfeeding at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions can increase the prevalence of any or exclusive breastfeeding up to and at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on how to best provide this support consistently for all individuals making feeding decisions for their infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1527-1537"},"PeriodicalIF":63.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Interventions to support breastfeeding may help individuals and families initiate breastfeeding or breastfeed exclusively or for a prolonged period of time.

Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of breastfeeding interventions to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 2016 recommendation.

Data sources: Studies included in the previous review were reevaluated for inclusion and updated searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through June 3, 2024. Surveillance for new evidence in targeted publications through January 24, 2025.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials that evaluated a primary care-relevant intervention designed to support breastfeeding. Of 290 full-text articles reviewed, 90 met inclusion criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies. Data were independently abstracted by one reviewer and confirmed by another.

Main outcomes and measures: Child and maternal health outcomes, prevalence, and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding, and harms related to interventions.

Results: Ninety trials (N = 49 597) reported in 125 publications were included. The evidence represented individuals from diverse backgrounds and interventions that varied in timing, delivery, and duration. There was limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions on infant health outcomes (10 trials [n = 6592]) and maternal symptoms of anxiety, depression, and well-being (9 trials [n = 2334]). Pooled analyses indicated beneficial associations between breastfeeding support interventions and any or exclusive breastfeeding for up to and at 6 months (any breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; 37 trials [n = 13 579] and exclusive breastfeeding: risk ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78]; 37 trials [n = 14 398]). There was no relationship between interventions and breastfeeding initiation or breastfeeding at 12 months.

Conclusions and relevance: The updated evidence confirms that breastfeeding support interventions can increase the prevalence of any or exclusive breastfeeding up to and at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on how to best provide this support consistently for all individuals making feeding decisions for their infants.

支持母乳喂养的干预措施:美国预防服务工作组的最新证据报告和系统评价。
重要性:支持母乳喂养的干预措施可以帮助个人和家庭开始母乳喂养或纯母乳喂养或长时间母乳喂养。目的:系统审查母乳喂养干预措施利弊的证据,以支持美国预防服务工作组更新其2016年建议。数据来源:在MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和PsycINFO中重新评估先前综述中纳入的研究,并更新检索至2024年6月3日。2025年1月24日之前,对目标出版物中的新证据进行监测。研究选择:评估旨在支持母乳喂养的初级保健相关干预措施的随机临床试验。在审查的290篇全文文章中,有90篇符合纳入标准。数据提取和综合:对所有临时纳入的研究进行独立的批判性评估。数据由一位审稿人独立提取,并由另一位审稿人确认。主要结果和措施:儿童和孕产妇健康结果、任何和纯母乳喂养的流行程度和持续时间,以及与干预措施有关的危害。结果:纳入125篇出版物中报道的90项试验(N = 49 597)。这些证据代表了来自不同背景的个体,以及在时间、交付和持续时间上不同的干预措施。关于母乳喂养支持干预对婴儿健康结局(10项试验[n = 6592])和母亲焦虑、抑郁和幸福症状(9项试验[n = 2334])的有效性,证据有限,证据混杂。汇总分析表明,母乳喂养支持干预与6个月以内和6个月以内的任何或纯母乳喂养之间存在有益的关联(任何母乳喂养:风险比,1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22];37项试验[n = 13 579]和纯母乳喂养:风险比为1.46 [95% CI, 1.20-1.78];37项试验[n = 14 398])。干预措施与母乳喂养开始或12个月时母乳喂养之间没有关系。结论和相关性:最新证据证实,母乳喂养支持干预措施可以增加6个月及以下任何或纯母乳喂养的患病率。今后的工作应侧重于如何最好地为所有决定喂养婴儿的个人提供一贯的这种支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信