Risk Assessment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients in Tibet: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S490160
Ji Qiong, Yanmei Gu, Jampa Dekyi, Dawa, Phurbu Tsring, Min Zhao, Xin Wang, Guangming Li, Haixia Liu
{"title":"Risk Assessment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients in Tibet: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.","authors":"Ji Qiong, Yanmei Gu, Jampa Dekyi, Dawa, Phurbu Tsring, Min Zhao, Xin Wang, Guangming Li, Haixia Liu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S490160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern in critically ill patients. However, the incidence and risk factors of VTE in high-altitude regions like Tibet remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of standardized anticoagulation therapy in preventing VTE among intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Tibet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective controlled study included 78 patients in the treatment group receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and 56 patients in the control group without standardized VTE prophylaxis. VTE incidence, risk factors, and safety outcomes were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one week after ICU discharge to assess VTE outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of VTE was significantly lower in the treatment group (35.9%) compared to the control group (42.9%, p<0.05). Risk factors for VTE included mechanical ventilation. The most common VTE type observed was deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with pulmonary embolism (PE) occurring less frequently. No significant bleeding events were observed in the treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized LMWH prophylaxis effectively reduces VTE incidence in critically ill patients in Tibet without increasing bleeding risk. Regular risk assessment and appropriate prophylaxis should be implemented in high-altitude ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1171-1179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S490160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern in critically ill patients. However, the incidence and risk factors of VTE in high-altitude regions like Tibet remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of standardized anticoagulation therapy in preventing VTE among intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Tibet.

Methods: This prospective controlled study included 78 patients in the treatment group receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and 56 patients in the control group without standardized VTE prophylaxis. VTE incidence, risk factors, and safety outcomes were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one week after ICU discharge to assess VTE outcomes.

Results: The incidence of VTE was significantly lower in the treatment group (35.9%) compared to the control group (42.9%, p<0.05). Risk factors for VTE included mechanical ventilation. The most common VTE type observed was deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with pulmonary embolism (PE) occurring less frequently. No significant bleeding events were observed in the treatment group.

Conclusion: Standardized LMWH prophylaxis effectively reduces VTE incidence in critically ill patients in Tibet without increasing bleeding risk. Regular risk assessment and appropriate prophylaxis should be implemented in high-altitude ICU settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信