The Color of Drinking Survey Questionnaire for Measuring the Secondhand Impacts of High-Risk Drinking in College Settings: Validation Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Agustina Marconi, Reonda Washington, Amanda Jovaag, Courtney Blomme, Ashley Knobeloch, Vilma Irazola, Carolina Muros Cortés, Laura Gutierrez, Natalia Elorriaga
{"title":"The Color of Drinking Survey Questionnaire for Measuring the Secondhand Impacts of High-Risk Drinking in College Settings: Validation Study.","authors":"Agustina Marconi, Reonda Washington, Amanda Jovaag, Courtney Blomme, Ashley Knobeloch, Vilma Irazola, Carolina Muros Cortés, Laura Gutierrez, Natalia Elorriaga","doi":"10.2196/64720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"Color of Drinking\" is a study conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. It examines the secondhand harms of high-risk drinking on college students of color and explores the connection between alcohol use and the campus racial climate. Since its findings were released in 2018, this study has received significant attention from other college settings around the country.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe the development of the most recent version of the Color of Drinking questionnaire and to assess its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in a sample of undergraduate students attending the University of Wisconsin-Madison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational, analytic study. Questionnaire design experts revised the original instrument, and in-depth cognitive interviews with students were conducted to evaluate comprehensibility and acceptability. The revised questionnaire was administered 2 times, 3 to 4 weeks apart, in a sample of undergraduate students. The following properties were studied: internal consistency in 4 sets of items (Cronbach α), test-retest reliability among closed-ended questions (κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient), and construct validity (associations with other validated instruments, such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). For a section of questions showing low reliability, the answers to open questions and other in-depth interviews were carried out, and online surveys were conducted with another sample of undergraduate students to evaluate reliability after changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight students participated in the in-depth interviews, 177 responses from the online survey were included for the analysis of internal consistency, 115 for test-retest reliability, and 98 for construct validity. The 4 sets of items (sections) evaluated (\"impact of alcohol consumption on academics,\" \"impact of microaggressions,\" \"witnessing microaggressions and alcohol intoxication,\" and \"bystanders' interventions on alcohol intoxication\") presented good internal consistency (Cronbach α between 0.723 and 0.898). Most items showed moderate to substantial test-retest reliability; agreement was from 68.1% to 95.2%, and κ coefficients ranged from 0.214 to 0.8. For construct validity, correlations between the number of drinking days, the maximum number of drinks in a day and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score were moderate to high, r=0.630 (95% CI 0.533-0.719) and r=0.647 (95% CI 0.548-0.741), respectively. Due to low reliability, a section regarding \"health impacts\" has been redesigned, including 8 items for the personal consumption of alcohol and the consumption of others (Cronbach α 0.735 and 0.855, respectively; agreement between the first and the second time the questionnaire was administered were 83.4% and 99.1%, and most of the items with κ coefficient from 0.476 to 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised version of the Color of Drinking questionnaire showed acceptable to adequate reliability and construct validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e64720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The "Color of Drinking" is a study conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. It examines the secondhand harms of high-risk drinking on college students of color and explores the connection between alcohol use and the campus racial climate. Since its findings were released in 2018, this study has received significant attention from other college settings around the country.

Objective: This study aims to describe the development of the most recent version of the Color of Drinking questionnaire and to assess its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in a sample of undergraduate students attending the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Methods: This is an observational, analytic study. Questionnaire design experts revised the original instrument, and in-depth cognitive interviews with students were conducted to evaluate comprehensibility and acceptability. The revised questionnaire was administered 2 times, 3 to 4 weeks apart, in a sample of undergraduate students. The following properties were studied: internal consistency in 4 sets of items (Cronbach α), test-retest reliability among closed-ended questions (κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient), and construct validity (associations with other validated instruments, such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). For a section of questions showing low reliability, the answers to open questions and other in-depth interviews were carried out, and online surveys were conducted with another sample of undergraduate students to evaluate reliability after changes.

Results: Eight students participated in the in-depth interviews, 177 responses from the online survey were included for the analysis of internal consistency, 115 for test-retest reliability, and 98 for construct validity. The 4 sets of items (sections) evaluated ("impact of alcohol consumption on academics," "impact of microaggressions," "witnessing microaggressions and alcohol intoxication," and "bystanders' interventions on alcohol intoxication") presented good internal consistency (Cronbach α between 0.723 and 0.898). Most items showed moderate to substantial test-retest reliability; agreement was from 68.1% to 95.2%, and κ coefficients ranged from 0.214 to 0.8. For construct validity, correlations between the number of drinking days, the maximum number of drinks in a day and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score were moderate to high, r=0.630 (95% CI 0.533-0.719) and r=0.647 (95% CI 0.548-0.741), respectively. Due to low reliability, a section regarding "health impacts" has been redesigned, including 8 items for the personal consumption of alcohol and the consumption of others (Cronbach α 0.735 and 0.855, respectively; agreement between the first and the second time the questionnaire was administered were 83.4% and 99.1%, and most of the items with κ coefficient from 0.476 to 0.877).

Conclusions: The revised version of the Color of Drinking questionnaire showed acceptable to adequate reliability and construct validity.

饮酒颜色调查问卷测量高校高危饮酒的二手影响:验证性研究。
背景介绍饮酒的颜色 "是威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校开展的一项研究。它考察了高风险饮酒对有色人种大学生的二次伤害,并探讨了酒精使用与校园种族氛围之间的联系。自 2018 年发布研究结果以来,这项研究受到了全国其他高校的广泛关注:本研究旨在描述最新版 "饮酒的颜色 "问卷的发展,并在威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校的本科生样本中评估其内部一致性、重测可靠性和建构效度:这是一项观察分析研究。问卷设计专家对原始问卷进行了修订,并对学生进行了深入的认知访谈,以评估其可理解性和可接受性。修订后的问卷在本科生中进行了 2 次抽样调查,每次间隔 3 至 4 周。对以下特性进行了研究:4 组项目的内部一致性(Cronbach α)、封闭式问题的重测信度(κ 统计量和类内相关系数)以及结构效度(与酒精使用障碍识别测试等其他已验证工具的关联)。对于部分信度较低的问题,进行了开放性问题的回答和其他深度访谈,并对另一个本科生样本进行了在线调查,以评估更改后的信度:结果:8 名学生参加了深度访谈,177 份在线调查问卷的回答被纳入内部一致性分析,115 份被纳入重测信度分析,98 份被纳入建构效度分析。所评估的 4 组项目(部分)("饮酒对学业的影响"、"微观诽谤的影响"、"目睹微观诽谤和酒精中毒 "以及 "旁观者对酒精中毒的干预")具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach α 在 0.723 和 0.898 之间)。大多数项目显示出中等至较高的重测可靠性;一致性在 68.1%至 95.2%之间,κ 系数在 0.214 至 0.8 之间。在构建效度方面,饮酒天数、一天内最多饮酒次数和酒精使用障碍识别测验分数之间的相关性为中度到高度相关,分别为r=0.630(95% CI 0.533-0.719)和r=0.647(95% CI 0.548-0.741)。由于可信度较低,我们重新设计了 "健康影响 "部分,其中包括 8 个关于个人饮酒和他人饮酒的项目(Cronbach α 分别为 0.735 和 0.855;第一次和第二次问卷调查的一致性分别为 83.4% 和 99.1%,大部分项目的 κ 系数在 0.476 至 0.877 之间):结论:修订版 "饮酒色彩 "问卷的信度和建构效度均可接受,甚至足够高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信