José Mauro Granjeiro, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury, Jaime Aparecido Cury, Mike Bueno, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Carlos Estrela
{"title":"The Future of Scientific Writing: AI Tools, Benefits, and Ethical Implications.","authors":"José Mauro Granjeiro, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury, Jaime Aparecido Cury, Mike Bueno, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Carlos Estrela","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020256471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) transforms scientific writing by improving efficiency, accessibility, and quality. This study evaluated the applications, benefits, and challenges of AI tools, including Elicit, Perplexity, Consensus, ChatGPT, and Grammarly, in the literature review, information organization, and textual clarity enhancement. A narrative review and practical analysis were conducted, assessing the tools based on synthesis capabilities, accessibility, and accuracy. Results showed that AI tools optimize literature analysis and enhance the clarity of scientific texts, particularly for non-native English-speaking researchers. However, limitations include technical inaccuracies, excessive standardization of writing style, and ethical concerns regarding authorship and accountability. The study concludes that while AI can significantly support scientific writing, its adoption should be accompanied by stringent human oversight and adherence to ethical guidelines to maintain academic integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"e256471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) transforms scientific writing by improving efficiency, accessibility, and quality. This study evaluated the applications, benefits, and challenges of AI tools, including Elicit, Perplexity, Consensus, ChatGPT, and Grammarly, in the literature review, information organization, and textual clarity enhancement. A narrative review and practical analysis were conducted, assessing the tools based on synthesis capabilities, accessibility, and accuracy. Results showed that AI tools optimize literature analysis and enhance the clarity of scientific texts, particularly for non-native English-speaking researchers. However, limitations include technical inaccuracies, excessive standardization of writing style, and ethical concerns regarding authorship and accountability. The study concludes that while AI can significantly support scientific writing, its adoption should be accompanied by stringent human oversight and adherence to ethical guidelines to maintain academic integrity.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
