Factors influencing critical thinking in simulation-based maternal-child nursing education among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sasitara Nuampa, Ameporn Ratinthorn, Pornnapa Tangsuksan, Thiwarphorn Chalermpichai, Kornkanok Kuesakul, Rungnapa Ruchob, Janya Chanphong, Jitrapee Buranasak, Naiyana Khadking, Kultida Subsomboon, Saowaros Pangzup, Sudhathai Sirithepmontree, Puttiraporn Hungsawanus
{"title":"Factors influencing critical thinking in simulation-based maternal-child nursing education among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Sasitara Nuampa, Ameporn Ratinthorn, Pornnapa Tangsuksan, Thiwarphorn Chalermpichai, Kornkanok Kuesakul, Rungnapa Ruchob, Janya Chanphong, Jitrapee Buranasak, Naiyana Khadking, Kultida Subsomboon, Saowaros Pangzup, Sudhathai Sirithepmontree, Puttiraporn Hungsawanus","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03016-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical thinking constitutes a multifaceted and dynamic process to make appropriate decisions and solve problems. In simulation-based learning, critical thinking can be influenced by personal factors, facilitators, and design.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to investigate the experiences and factors associated with critical thinking in simulation-based maternal-child nursing education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative phase, convenience sampling was employed to select 400 undergraduate nursing students who met the following inclusion criteria: no history of repeating the maternal-child nursing and midwifery practicum course and class attendance of at least 80% of the total instructional hours. Following the completion of quantitative data collection, purposive sampling was used to recruit 80 students who had participated in and completed the initial survey to participate in focus group discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the nursing students had moderate scores of critical thinking on maternal-child nursing simulation. The regression analysis revealed that perception of professional identity, a personal factor, was statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking (Beta = 0.207, t = 4.607, p = 0.000). Additionally, the attitude toward simulation (Beta = 0.139, t = 2.731, p = 0.007) and perceived stress (Beta = -0.103, t = -2.269, p = 0.024) were statistically significantly associated with critical thinking level. In the simulation design, the support aspect toward simulation design (Beta = 0.265, t = 2.943, p = 0.003) and the problem-solving aspect toward simulation importance (Beta = 0.239, t = 2.288, p = 0.023) were statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking. The multiple linear regression model accounted for 35% of the variance in critical thinking with maternal-child nursing simulated learning. Qualitative data revealed the following themes: (1) a well-planned approach enables me to optimize my learning; (2) allow me to make mistakes, but please don't leave me with failure; and (3) emulating practice shapes my growth as a nursing professional.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The personal factor and simulation design factors were important for increasing critical thinking level. Promoting effective learning strategies, such as the use of simulated experiences, is useful in enhancing midwifery and nursing students' competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03016-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical thinking constitutes a multifaceted and dynamic process to make appropriate decisions and solve problems. In simulation-based learning, critical thinking can be influenced by personal factors, facilitators, and design.

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the experiences and factors associated with critical thinking in simulation-based maternal-child nursing education.

Methods: This study utilized an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative phase, convenience sampling was employed to select 400 undergraduate nursing students who met the following inclusion criteria: no history of repeating the maternal-child nursing and midwifery practicum course and class attendance of at least 80% of the total instructional hours. Following the completion of quantitative data collection, purposive sampling was used to recruit 80 students who had participated in and completed the initial survey to participate in focus group discussions.

Results: Half of the nursing students had moderate scores of critical thinking on maternal-child nursing simulation. The regression analysis revealed that perception of professional identity, a personal factor, was statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking (Beta = 0.207, t = 4.607, p = 0.000). Additionally, the attitude toward simulation (Beta = 0.139, t = 2.731, p = 0.007) and perceived stress (Beta = -0.103, t = -2.269, p = 0.024) were statistically significantly associated with critical thinking level. In the simulation design, the support aspect toward simulation design (Beta = 0.265, t = 2.943, p = 0.003) and the problem-solving aspect toward simulation importance (Beta = 0.239, t = 2.288, p = 0.023) were statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking. The multiple linear regression model accounted for 35% of the variance in critical thinking with maternal-child nursing simulated learning. Qualitative data revealed the following themes: (1) a well-planned approach enables me to optimize my learning; (2) allow me to make mistakes, but please don't leave me with failure; and (3) emulating practice shapes my growth as a nursing professional.

Conclusions: The personal factor and simulation design factors were important for increasing critical thinking level. Promoting effective learning strategies, such as the use of simulated experiences, is useful in enhancing midwifery and nursing students' competencies.

影响本科护生基于模拟的母婴护理教育中批判性思维的因素:一项混合方法研究。
背景:批判性思维是一个多方面和动态的过程,以做出适当的决策和解决问题。在基于模拟的学习中,批判性思维会受到个人因素、辅助因素和设计的影响。目的:探讨基于模拟的母婴护理教育中批判性思维培养的经验及相关因素。方法:本研究采用解释性顺序混合方法。在定量阶段,采用方便抽样的方法选择400名本科护理学生,他们符合以下纳入标准:没有重复母婴护理和助产实习课程的历史,上课出勤率至少占总教学时数的80%。在完成定量数据收集后,采用有目的抽样的方法,招募80名参与并完成初步调查的学生参加焦点小组讨论。结果:半数护生在模拟母婴护理的批判性思维得分为中等。回归分析显示,职业认同知觉与批判性思维水平显著相关(Beta = 0.207, t = 4.607, p = 0.000)。此外,模拟态度(Beta = 0.139, t = 2.731, p = 0.007)和感知压力(Beta = -0.103, t = -2.269, p = 0.024)与批判性思维水平有统计学显著相关。在模拟设计中,对模拟设计的支持方面(Beta = 0.265, t = 2.943, p = 0.003)和对模拟重要性的解决问题方面(Beta = 0.239, t = 2.288, p = 0.023)与高水平的批判性思维有统计学显著相关。多元线性回归模型解释了35%的批判性思维与母婴模拟学习的方差。定性数据揭示了以下主题:(1)精心规划的方法可以优化我的学习;允许我犯错误,但请不要让我失败;(3)模仿实践塑造了我作为一名护理专业人员的成长。结论:个人因素和模拟设计因素对提高批判性思维水平有重要作用。推广有效的学习策略,例如使用模拟经验,有助于提高助产学和护理学学生的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信