Bridging generational gaps in medication safety: insights from nurses, students, and generative AI models.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Brurya Orkaby, Erika Kerner, Mor Saban, Chedva Levin
{"title":"Bridging generational gaps in medication safety: insights from nurses, students, and generative AI models.","authors":"Brurya Orkaby, Erika Kerner, Mor Saban, Chedva Levin","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03034-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated medication dose calculation accuracy among nurses, nursing students, and Generative AI (GenAI) models, examining error prevention strategies across generational cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2024, involving 101 pediatric/neonatal nurses, 91 nursing students, and four GenAI models. Participants completed a questionnaire on calculation proficiency and provided recommendations for error prevention. Qualitative responses were analyzed to describe attitudes and perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70% of nurses reported previous medication errors compared to 19.5% of students. Thematic analysis identified six key areas for error prevention: double-checking, calculation methods, work environment, training, drug configuration, and technology use. Only students recommended GenAI integration, while nurses emphasized double-checking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights generational differences in medication safety approaches and suggests potential benefits of incorporating GenAI as an additional verification layer. These findings contribute to improving nursing education and practice through technological advancements while addressing persistent medication calculation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03034-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated medication dose calculation accuracy among nurses, nursing students, and Generative AI (GenAI) models, examining error prevention strategies across generational cohorts.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2024, involving 101 pediatric/neonatal nurses, 91 nursing students, and four GenAI models. Participants completed a questionnaire on calculation proficiency and provided recommendations for error prevention. Qualitative responses were analyzed to describe attitudes and perceptions.

Results: 70% of nurses reported previous medication errors compared to 19.5% of students. Thematic analysis identified six key areas for error prevention: double-checking, calculation methods, work environment, training, drug configuration, and technology use. Only students recommended GenAI integration, while nurses emphasized double-checking.

Conclusions: The study highlights generational differences in medication safety approaches and suggests potential benefits of incorporating GenAI as an additional verification layer. These findings contribute to improving nursing education and practice through technological advancements while addressing persistent medication calculation challenges.

弥合药物安全方面的代沟:来自护士、学生和生成式人工智能模型的见解。
背景:本研究调查了护士、护生和生成人工智能(GenAI)模型的药物剂量计算准确性,检查了跨代队列的错误预防策略。方法:于2024年6 - 8月对101名儿科/新生儿护士、91名护生和4个GenAI模型进行横断面研究。参与者完成了一份关于计算能力的调查问卷,并提供了预防错误的建议。定性回答被分析来描述态度和看法。结果:70%的护士报告有用药错误,而19.5%的学生报告有用药错误。专题分析确定了预防错误的六个关键领域:双重检查、计算方法、工作环境、培训、药物配置和技术使用。只有学生推荐GenAI整合,而护士强调重复检查。结论:该研究强调了药物安全方法的代际差异,并建议将GenAI作为额外验证层的潜在益处。这些发现有助于通过技术进步改善护理教育和实践,同时解决持续存在的药物计算挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信