Viviane Souza Bicalho Bacelete, Elisa Meiti Ribeiro Lin Plec, Flávio Barbosa Nunes, Andréa Rodrigues Motta, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama
{"title":"Immediate effects of photobiomodulation with low-level laser in women with no laryngeal or voice changes: preliminary results.","authors":"Viviane Souza Bicalho Bacelete, Elisa Meiti Ribeiro Lin Plec, Flávio Barbosa Nunes, Andréa Rodrigues Motta, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240222en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and immediate effect of photobiomodulation of low-level laser in vocally healthy women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimental research in 36 vocally healthy women aged 18 to 45 years, with skin phototype I to III and body mass index below 25. Participants were randomized to form four groups: Group 1: placebo laser photobiomodulation followed by voiced tongue trill technique (VTTT); Group 2: 3 J infrared laser per point (total 21 J) followed by VTTT; Group: 3: 6 J infrared laser per point (total 42 J) followed by VTTT; and Group 4: 9 J infrared laser per point (total 63 J) followed by VTTT. The following outcomes were assessed: auditory-perceptual evaluation, acoustic analysis (jitter, shimmer, amplitude perturbation quotient [APQ], noise-to-harmonic ratio, period perturbation quotient, cepstral peak prominence, and cepstral peak prominence smoothed), and self-perceived phonatory effort. All participants' records were taken before and immediately after the experiments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in voice quality, acoustic parameters, or self-perceived phonatory discomfort between intervention moments in the placebo, VTTT + 3 J, and VTTT + 6 J groups in the intragroup comparison. G4 (VTTT + 9 J) decreased shimmer and APQ aperiodicity measures (respective p-values: 0.033; 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate aperiodicity measures improved with VTTT preceded by 9 J low-level laser application per point, commending this irradiation dosimetry as a possible energy for voice therapy in light-skinned and normal-BMI women. There was no evidence of worsened measures or in-creased discomfort with this resource, indicating it is safe for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 3","pages":"e20240222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240222en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the safety and immediate effect of photobiomodulation of low-level laser in vocally healthy women.
Methods: Experimental research in 36 vocally healthy women aged 18 to 45 years, with skin phototype I to III and body mass index below 25. Participants were randomized to form four groups: Group 1: placebo laser photobiomodulation followed by voiced tongue trill technique (VTTT); Group 2: 3 J infrared laser per point (total 21 J) followed by VTTT; Group: 3: 6 J infrared laser per point (total 42 J) followed by VTTT; and Group 4: 9 J infrared laser per point (total 63 J) followed by VTTT. The following outcomes were assessed: auditory-perceptual evaluation, acoustic analysis (jitter, shimmer, amplitude perturbation quotient [APQ], noise-to-harmonic ratio, period perturbation quotient, cepstral peak prominence, and cepstral peak prominence smoothed), and self-perceived phonatory effort. All participants' records were taken before and immediately after the experiments.
Results: There was no significant difference in voice quality, acoustic parameters, or self-perceived phonatory discomfort between intervention moments in the placebo, VTTT + 3 J, and VTTT + 6 J groups in the intragroup comparison. G4 (VTTT + 9 J) decreased shimmer and APQ aperiodicity measures (respective p-values: 0.033; 0.044).
Conclusion: Results indicate aperiodicity measures improved with VTTT preceded by 9 J low-level laser application per point, commending this irradiation dosimetry as a possible energy for voice therapy in light-skinned and normal-BMI women. There was no evidence of worsened measures or in-creased discomfort with this resource, indicating it is safe for clinical practice.