The effectiveness of unimodality organ preservation surgery vs radiotherapy for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00120
Delu Gunasekera, Sahil Goel, Stephen Kao, Suren Krishnan, John Charles Hodge, Andrew Foreman, Jennifer Stone
{"title":"The effectiveness of unimodality organ preservation surgery vs radiotherapy for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Delu Gunasekera, Sahil Goel, Stephen Kao, Suren Krishnan, John Charles Hodge, Andrew Foreman, Jennifer Stone","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine the comparative effectiveness of unimodality organ preservation surgery versus radiotherapy on oncological and functional outcomes in patients with early hypopharyngeal cancer.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early hypopharyngeal cancer is difficult to detect and, therefore, rarely diagnosed, as patients are often asymptomatic. Radiotherapy is considered the main treatment, although this modality has been compared to the previously used open surgical approach, which may not reflect current surgical options. This is reflected in the available literature, with a paucity of data on management guidelines. Minimally invasive surgery is providing better access to the hypopharynx, such as CO 2 laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery. These novel surgical procedures may pave the way for revised guidelines to managing hypopharyngeal cancer.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include randomized controlled trials and quasi- (or pseudo-randomized) experimental studies that investigate organ preservation surgery and radiotherapy treatments for early hypopharyngeal cancer in adults with primary disease. Primary outcomes include disease-free survival of 2 years or up to 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes are functional, including swallowing, phonation, and complications associated with treatment, such as post-procedural hemorrhage; return to theater or operating room; tracheostomizing patients; post-radiation mucositis; dysphagia/odynophagia; and xerostomia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Four databases will be searched: PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and the Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and assess methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Individual study estimates will be pooled in a meta-analysis and presented in forest plots.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023400206.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"756-764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to determine the comparative effectiveness of unimodality organ preservation surgery versus radiotherapy on oncological and functional outcomes in patients with early hypopharyngeal cancer.

Introduction: Early hypopharyngeal cancer is difficult to detect and, therefore, rarely diagnosed, as patients are often asymptomatic. Radiotherapy is considered the main treatment, although this modality has been compared to the previously used open surgical approach, which may not reflect current surgical options. This is reflected in the available literature, with a paucity of data on management guidelines. Minimally invasive surgery is providing better access to the hypopharynx, such as CO 2 laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery. These novel surgical procedures may pave the way for revised guidelines to managing hypopharyngeal cancer.

Inclusion criteria: We will include randomized controlled trials and quasi- (or pseudo-randomized) experimental studies that investigate organ preservation surgery and radiotherapy treatments for early hypopharyngeal cancer in adults with primary disease. Primary outcomes include disease-free survival of 2 years or up to 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes are functional, including swallowing, phonation, and complications associated with treatment, such as post-procedural hemorrhage; return to theater or operating room; tracheostomizing patients; post-radiation mucositis; dysphagia/odynophagia; and xerostomia.

Methods: The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Four databases will be searched: PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and the Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and assess methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Individual study estimates will be pooled in a meta-analysis and presented in forest plots.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023400206.

单式器官保存手术与器官保存放疗治疗早期下咽癌的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
目的:我们的目的是确定单模器官保存手术与放疗对早期下咽癌患者肿瘤和功能预后的比较效果。简介:早期下咽癌很难发现,因此很少被诊断,因为患者通常无症状。放疗被认为是主要的治疗方法,尽管这种方式与以前使用的开放手术方法相比,可能不能反映当前的手术选择。这反映在现有的文献中,缺乏关于管理准则的数据。微创手术提供了更好的进入下咽的途径,如CO2激光显微手术和经口机器人手术。这些新颖的外科手术可能为下咽癌治疗指南的修订铺平道路。纳入标准:我们将纳入随机对照试验和准(或伪随机)实验研究,研究原发性成人早期下咽癌的器官保存手术和放疗治疗。主要结局包括2年无病生存期或5年总生存期。次要结局是功能性的,包括吞咽、发声和与治疗相关的并发症,如手术后出血;返回手术室或返回手术室;tracheostomizing病人;标明辐射粘膜炎;吞咽困难、吞咽痛;和口腔干燥。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法对有效性进行系统评价。四个数据库将被检索,即PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost)和Cochrane图书馆。两名独立审稿人将使用JBI关键评估工具筛选研究并评估方法质量。单个研究估计将汇总在一个荟萃分析中,并在森林样地中呈现。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO CRD42023400206。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信