Impact of Signal Intensity Change in MRI on the Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
{"title":"Impact of Signal Intensity Change in MRI on the Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Narihito Nagoshi, Satoru Egawa, Toshitaka Yoshii, Kenichiro Sakai, Kazuo Kusano, Shunji Tsutsui, Takashi Hirai, Yu Matsukura, Kanichiro Wada, Keiichi Katsumi, Masao Koda, Atsushi Kimura, Takeo Furuya, Satoshi Maki, Norihiro Nishida, Yukitaka Nagamoto, Yasushi Oshima, Kei Ando, Hiroaki Nakashima, Masahiko Takahata, Kanji Mori, Hideaki Nakajima, Kazuma Murata, Masayuki Miyagi, Takashi Kaito, Kei Yamada, Tomohiro Banno, Satoshi Kato, Tetsuro Ohba, Hiroshi Moridaira, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Hiroyuki Katoh, Haruo Kanno, Kota Watanabe, Hiroshi Taneichi, Shiro Imagama, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Katsushi Takeshita, Masaya Nakamura, Morio Matsumoto, Masashi Yamazaki","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A multicenter prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical significance of intramedullary signal intensity (SI) changes on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and assess their impact on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In OPLL, SI changes on MRI are frequently observed, but their prognostic significance remains unclear. Although some studies associate SI changes with poor neurological function and recovery, others report a weak correlation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 402 patients with cervical OPLL were analyzed. Patients were classified into SI (+) and SI (-) groups based on preoperative T2-weighted MRI. Clinical outcomes, including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the visual analog scale, and the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire, were evaluated preoperatively and at two years postoperatively. Multiple regression and logistic regression were performed to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 348 cases (86.6%) were in the SI (+) group. Patients in the SI (+) group were older and had greater cervical range of motion (ROM). They exhibited lower preoperative JOA scores and more severe extremity pain. However, at two-year follow-up, neurological improvement, pain reduction, and patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SI changes on MRI are associated with worse preoperative neurological function and greater pain but do not predict inferior surgical outcomes. Surgical decompression remains effective regardless of SI changes, which can be valuable information for explaining the prognosis to patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of intramedullary signal intensity (SI) changes on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and assess their impact on surgical outcomes.
Summary of background data: In OPLL, SI changes on MRI are frequently observed, but their prognostic significance remains unclear. Although some studies associate SI changes with poor neurological function and recovery, others report a weak correlation.
Methods: A total of 402 patients with cervical OPLL were analyzed. Patients were classified into SI (+) and SI (-) groups based on preoperative T2-weighted MRI. Clinical outcomes, including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the visual analog scale, and the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire, were evaluated preoperatively and at two years postoperatively. Multiple regression and logistic regression were performed to adjust for confounders.
Results: A total of 348 cases (86.6%) were in the SI (+) group. Patients in the SI (+) group were older and had greater cervical range of motion (ROM). They exhibited lower preoperative JOA scores and more severe extremity pain. However, at two-year follow-up, neurological improvement, pain reduction, and patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion: SI changes on MRI are associated with worse preoperative neurological function and greater pain but do not predict inferior surgical outcomes. Surgical decompression remains effective regardless of SI changes, which can be valuable information for explaining the prognosis to patients in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.