Monitoring physical behavior in pediatric physical therapy: A mixed methods feasibility study to evaluate a newly developed toolkit and training.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319659
Barbara Engels, Elles Kotte, Raoul Engelbert, Marleen E Sol, Remko van der Lugt, Harriët Wittink, Jan Willem Gorter, Manon A T Bloemen
{"title":"Monitoring physical behavior in pediatric physical therapy: A mixed methods feasibility study to evaluate a newly developed toolkit and training.","authors":"Barbara Engels, Elles Kotte, Raoul Engelbert, Marleen E Sol, Remko van der Lugt, Harriët Wittink, Jan Willem Gorter, Manon A T Bloemen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0319659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric physical therapists (PPTs) aim to enhance active physical behavior but lack feasible accelerometry devices to assess and evaluate physical activity (PA). We developed an activity monitoring prototype toolkit (AM-p Toolkit) consisting of a wearable, a docking station, a digital tool for data analysis, and physical tools for communication with children and parents. A training for PPTs was also created. We aim to explore the feasibility of the AM-p Toolkit from the perspectives of PPTs, children, and parents and to assess if training improved PPTs' knowledge, skills, and confidence in using the Toolkit.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, we collected data through questionnaires, individual interviews, and focus groups, guided by Bowen's dimensions of 'acceptability,' 'demand,' and 'practicality.' We included children with the ability to walk, their parents, and their PPTs. The training was evaluated by analyzing PPTs' knowledge, skills, and confidence using the AM-p Toolkit. Quantitative results were analyzed descriptively (mean [SD] and median [interquartile range] when appropriate and qualitative data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen PPTs, 17 parents, and 20 children completed the study. PPTs rated overall satisfaction on a 10-point scale with the AM-p Toolkit at 6.3 (SD 1.2), and parents rated it 7.3 (SD 1.6). The following themes emerged for acceptability, demand, and practicality respectively: for acceptability: 1) expected added value, 2) quality and usability, and 3) design; for demand: 1) use and non-use, 2) further development, and 3) willingness for future use; and for practicality: 1) time constraints and 2) integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AM-p Toolkit shows promise in PPT, with generally positive acceptability among all end-users. PPTs see potential for certain groups of children who can benefit from the AM-p Toolkit. Practicality requires improvements in the web application and refinement of the strap. Training is important and can be strengthened by emphasizing the analysis of assessment results, clinical reasoning, and functional goal-setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0319659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric physical therapists (PPTs) aim to enhance active physical behavior but lack feasible accelerometry devices to assess and evaluate physical activity (PA). We developed an activity monitoring prototype toolkit (AM-p Toolkit) consisting of a wearable, a docking station, a digital tool for data analysis, and physical tools for communication with children and parents. A training for PPTs was also created. We aim to explore the feasibility of the AM-p Toolkit from the perspectives of PPTs, children, and parents and to assess if training improved PPTs' knowledge, skills, and confidence in using the Toolkit.

Participants and methods: Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, we collected data through questionnaires, individual interviews, and focus groups, guided by Bowen's dimensions of 'acceptability,' 'demand,' and 'practicality.' We included children with the ability to walk, their parents, and their PPTs. The training was evaluated by analyzing PPTs' knowledge, skills, and confidence using the AM-p Toolkit. Quantitative results were analyzed descriptively (mean [SD] and median [interquartile range] when appropriate and qualitative data were analyzed thematically.

Results: Fifteen PPTs, 17 parents, and 20 children completed the study. PPTs rated overall satisfaction on a 10-point scale with the AM-p Toolkit at 6.3 (SD 1.2), and parents rated it 7.3 (SD 1.6). The following themes emerged for acceptability, demand, and practicality respectively: for acceptability: 1) expected added value, 2) quality and usability, and 3) design; for demand: 1) use and non-use, 2) further development, and 3) willingness for future use; and for practicality: 1) time constraints and 2) integration.

Conclusion: The AM-p Toolkit shows promise in PPT, with generally positive acceptability among all end-users. PPTs see potential for certain groups of children who can benefit from the AM-p Toolkit. Practicality requires improvements in the web application and refinement of the strap. Training is important and can be strengthened by emphasizing the analysis of assessment results, clinical reasoning, and functional goal-setting.

监测儿童物理治疗中的身体行为:一项评估新开发工具包和培训的混合方法可行性研究。
儿科物理治疗师(PPTs)的目标是增强积极的身体行为,但缺乏可行的加速计设备来评估和评估身体活动(PA)。我们开发了一个活动监测原型工具包(AM-p工具包),包括一个可穿戴设备、一个坞站、一个用于数据分析的数字工具,以及用于与儿童和家长沟通的物理工具。此外,还开办了一项培训pt的课程。我们的目标是从家长、儿童和家长的角度探讨AM-p工具包的可行性,并评估培训是否提高了家长的知识、技能和使用工具包的信心。参与者和方法:采用解释性顺序混合方法设计,我们通过问卷调查、个人访谈和焦点小组收集数据,以Bowen的“可接受性”、“需求”和“实用性”维度为指导。我们包括有行走能力的儿童,他们的父母和他们的pt。通过使用AM-p工具包分析培训人员的知识、技能和信心来评估培训。定量结果进行描述性分析(均数[SD]和中位数[四分位间距]),适当的定性数据进行主题分析。结果:15名家长、17名家长和20名儿童完成了研究。家长对AM-p工具包的总体满意度评分为6.3分(标准差1.2),家长对其评分为7.3分(标准差1.6)。以下主题分别出现在可接受性、需求和实用性方面:可接受性方面:1)预期的附加价值,2)质量和可用性,3)设计;需求:1)使用和不使用,2)进一步开发,3)愿意将来使用;实用性方面:1)时间限制和2)集成。结论:AM-p Toolkit在PPT中显示出前景,在所有最终用户中普遍具有积极的可接受性。私人治疗看到了某些儿童群体的潜力,他们可以从AM-p工具包中受益。实用性需要改进网络应用和改进表带。培训很重要,可以通过强调评估结果的分析、临床推理和功能目标的设定来加强培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信