{"title":"Predicting Risk of Lung Cancer From Medical History.","authors":"Amaljith Kuttamath","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lung cancer causes 130 000 deaths annually in the United States, with treatment costs averaging $150 000 per patient and a 5-year survival rate of 20.5%. Current screening criteria rely on smoking history and age, missing other risk factors. This study aimed to identify clinical risk factors and social determinants of health (SDoH) for enhanced risk assessment using electronic health record (EHR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 410 298 patient records from the All of Us Research Program, including 9375 lung cancer cases identified through SNOMED coding. Using Logistic LASSO regression, we developed predictive models based on diagnoses grouped by body systems and their interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune systems showed three-fold greater association with lung cancer than other systems. Brain metastasis showed the strongest association (odds ratio 5.0, 95% CI: 4.2-5.8). The final model achieved an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.84) and 78% sensitivity in validation. Patients with documented social determinants showed 2.5-fold higher risk (95% CI: 2.1-2.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR-based prediction models effectively identify lung cancer risk using readily available medical history data. These findings support expanding current screening criteria beyond traditional risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":"34 2","pages":"181-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Lung cancer causes 130 000 deaths annually in the United States, with treatment costs averaging $150 000 per patient and a 5-year survival rate of 20.5%. Current screening criteria rely on smoking history and age, missing other risk factors. This study aimed to identify clinical risk factors and social determinants of health (SDoH) for enhanced risk assessment using electronic health record (EHR) data.
Methods: We analyzed 410 298 patient records from the All of Us Research Program, including 9375 lung cancer cases identified through SNOMED coding. Using Logistic LASSO regression, we developed predictive models based on diagnoses grouped by body systems and their interactions.
Results: Respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune systems showed three-fold greater association with lung cancer than other systems. Brain metastasis showed the strongest association (odds ratio 5.0, 95% CI: 4.2-5.8). The final model achieved an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.84) and 78% sensitivity in validation. Patients with documented social determinants showed 2.5-fold higher risk (95% CI: 2.1-2.9).
Conclusions: EHR-based prediction models effectively identify lung cancer risk using readily available medical history data. These findings support expanding current screening criteria beyond traditional risk factors.
期刊介绍:
Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it:
-Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes;
-Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes;
-Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making;
-Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes;
-Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.