Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study.

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Neal S Krishna, Emiliano Garza-Frias, Giridhar Dasegowda, Parisa Kaviani, Lina Karout, Roshan Fahimi, Bernardo Bizzo, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Subba Digumarthy
{"title":"Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study.","authors":"Neal S Krishna, Emiliano Garza-Frias, Giridhar Dasegowda, Parisa Kaviani, Lina Karout, Roshan Fahimi, Bernardo Bizzo, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Subba Digumarthy","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":"441-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.

基于人工智能的图像分割和定心估计算法的通用性:多区域、多中心和多扫描仪研究。
我们创建并验证了一种开放获取的人工智能算法(AIc),用于评估多身体区域、多中心和多扫描仪研究中的图像分割和患者中心。我们的研究纳入了275例患者的825次头部、胸部和腹部骨盆CT(女性153例,男性128例;平均年龄(67±14岁)在5家学术医院和社区医院扫描。用AIc对CT图像进行处理,确定颅底(头部CT)、隆突(胸部CT)和L2-L3椎间盘(腹部CT)的垂直和水平定心。我们手动测量了垂直和水平偏离中心。我们发现AIc和人工估计的偏离中心在垂直(头部,r = 0.93;胸部,r = 0.94;腹部,r = 0.95)和水平方向(头部CT, r = 0.85;胸部,r = 0.85;腹部,r = 0.8),不同年龄组(r = 0.70-0.97),性别(r = 0.81-0.96),以及来自五个部位的多个扫描仪(r = 0.74-0.99)。居中和离心CT检查受者工作特征曲线下的AIc面积范围为0.72(头部)至0.99(胸部)。因此,我们的研究表明,正电子发射断层扫描/CT (PET/CT)检查通常表现出明显的偏离中心,特别是垂直偏差通常超过30毫米,水平偏差在10到30毫米之间。此外,它还证明了我们的人工智能模型可以有效地评估垂直和水平偏离中心,尽管它在估计垂直偏离中心方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信