Neal S Krishna, Emiliano Garza-Frias, Giridhar Dasegowda, Parisa Kaviani, Lina Karout, Roshan Fahimi, Bernardo Bizzo, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Subba Digumarthy
{"title":"Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study.","authors":"Neal S Krishna, Emiliano Garza-Frias, Giridhar Dasegowda, Parisa Kaviani, Lina Karout, Roshan Fahimi, Bernardo Bizzo, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Subba Digumarthy","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.