A novel ex vivo protocol that mimics length and excitation changes of human muscles during walking induces force losses in EDL but not in soleus of mdx mice.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320901
Xiao Hu, Allison N McCrady, Katherine E Bukovec, Claire Yuan, Emily Y Miller, Rachel K Bour, Anthony C Bruce, Katherine B Crump, Shayn M Peirce, Robert W Grange, Silvia S Blemker
{"title":"A novel ex vivo protocol that mimics length and excitation changes of human muscles during walking induces force losses in EDL but not in soleus of mdx mice.","authors":"Xiao Hu, Allison N McCrady, Katherine E Bukovec, Claire Yuan, Emily Y Miller, Rachel K Bour, Anthony C Bruce, Katherine B Crump, Shayn M Peirce, Robert W Grange, Silvia S Blemker","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although eccentric contraction protocols are widely used to study the pathophysiology and potential treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), they do not reflect the stresses, strains, strain rates, and excitation profiles that DMD muscles experience during human daily functional tasks, like walking. This limitation of eccentric contractions may impede our understanding of disease progression in DMD and proper assessment of treatment efficacy. The goals of this study were to examine the extent of force loss induced by a gait cycling protocol we developed, and compare to that from a typical eccentric contraction protocol in soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of mdx mice. To achieve this goal, mdx soleus and EDL muscles were subjected to eccentric contractions at three levels of strain (10%, 20% and 30% optimal length Lo) and up to 200 cycles of our gait cycling protocol that mimicked the length changes and excitation patterns of the corresponding muscles during human walking gait. Our results showed that EDL but not soleus muscles had significant losses in isometric tetanic forces after the cycling protocols. Compared to the eccentric contraction protocol, the decrements in contractile performance from the cycling protocol were similar to those from the eccentric contractions at 10% in soleus and 20% Lo in EDL. Together, these results indicated the gait cycling protocol is a valuable experimental approach to better understand disease progression and to screen and evaluate efficacy of novel therapeutics for DMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0320901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although eccentric contraction protocols are widely used to study the pathophysiology and potential treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), they do not reflect the stresses, strains, strain rates, and excitation profiles that DMD muscles experience during human daily functional tasks, like walking. This limitation of eccentric contractions may impede our understanding of disease progression in DMD and proper assessment of treatment efficacy. The goals of this study were to examine the extent of force loss induced by a gait cycling protocol we developed, and compare to that from a typical eccentric contraction protocol in soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of mdx mice. To achieve this goal, mdx soleus and EDL muscles were subjected to eccentric contractions at three levels of strain (10%, 20% and 30% optimal length Lo) and up to 200 cycles of our gait cycling protocol that mimicked the length changes and excitation patterns of the corresponding muscles during human walking gait. Our results showed that EDL but not soleus muscles had significant losses in isometric tetanic forces after the cycling protocols. Compared to the eccentric contraction protocol, the decrements in contractile performance from the cycling protocol were similar to those from the eccentric contractions at 10% in soleus and 20% Lo in EDL. Together, these results indicated the gait cycling protocol is a valuable experimental approach to better understand disease progression and to screen and evaluate efficacy of novel therapeutics for DMD.

一种新的离体方案,模仿人类肌肉在行走过程中的长度和兴奋变化,诱导EDL的力损失,但在mdx小鼠的比目鱼肌中没有。
尽管偏心收缩方案被广泛用于研究杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)的病理生理学和潜在治疗方法,但它们并不能反映DMD肌肉在人类日常功能任务(如行走)中所经历的应力、应变、应变率和兴奋谱。这种偏心收缩的局限性可能会阻碍我们对DMD疾病进展的理解和对治疗效果的正确评估。本研究的目的是检查我们开发的步态循环方案引起的力损失程度,并与mdx小鼠比目鱼和指长伸肌(EDL)肌肉的典型偏心收缩方案进行比较。为了实现这一目标,mdx比目鱼肌和EDL肌在三种应变水平(10%、20%和30%最佳长度Lo)下进行偏心收缩,并在我们的步态循环方案中进行多达200次循环,模拟人类步行步态中相应肌肉的长度变化和兴奋模式。我们的研究结果表明,在循环方案后,EDL而不是比目鱼肌在等长张力方面有明显的损失。与偏心收缩方案相比,循环方案的收缩性能下降与比目鱼肌10%的偏心收缩和EDL 20%的Lo的偏心收缩相似。总之,这些结果表明,步态循环方案是一种有价值的实验方法,可以更好地了解疾病进展,筛选和评估DMD新疗法的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信