Intragastric Balloon as a Bridge Before Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Mohammad Kermansaravi, Ali Esparham, Chetan Parmar, Farah A Husain, Ali Solouki, Mohammad Mahjoubi, Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri
{"title":"Intragastric Balloon as a Bridge Before Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Kermansaravi, Ali Esparham, Chetan Parmar, Farah A Husain, Ali Solouki, Mohammad Mahjoubi, Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07838-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intragastric balloon (IGB) acts as a restrictive procedure with acceptable short-term weight loss outcomes and a low incidence of major complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether preoperative insertion of an IGB can reduce perioperative complications and improve weight loss outcomes following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords to include studies on IGB as a bridge before MBS. The main outcome of this study was to compare the weight loss results and complications after MBS between the IGB group and the control group. For the meta-analysis of variables with severe and non-severe heterogeneity, random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses were used, respectively. Eleven articles were included. The IGB and control groups included 318 and 501 patients, respectively. The pooled random-effects analysis of six studies showed that preoperative IGB insertion resulted in a body mass index (BMI) loss of 7.45 kg/m<sup>2</sup> over a mean follow-up of 6.14 months. The major complication rate for IGB was 5%. The mean BMI change after MBS between the IGB and control groups was not significantly different after 15.06 months (mean difference - 4.08, p = 0.07). Additionally, a fixed-effects analysis of ten studies found no significant difference in post-MBS complication rates between the IGB and control groups (OR 0.66, p = 0.12). Even though using IGB as a bridging approach to subsequent MBS can result in significant reductions in preoperative BMI, this weight loss does not appear to positively impact the overall outcomes of MBS in patients in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07838-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intragastric balloon (IGB) acts as a restrictive procedure with acceptable short-term weight loss outcomes and a low incidence of major complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether preoperative insertion of an IGB can reduce perioperative complications and improve weight loss outcomes following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords to include studies on IGB as a bridge before MBS. The main outcome of this study was to compare the weight loss results and complications after MBS between the IGB group and the control group. For the meta-analysis of variables with severe and non-severe heterogeneity, random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses were used, respectively. Eleven articles were included. The IGB and control groups included 318 and 501 patients, respectively. The pooled random-effects analysis of six studies showed that preoperative IGB insertion resulted in a body mass index (BMI) loss of 7.45 kg/m2 over a mean follow-up of 6.14 months. The major complication rate for IGB was 5%. The mean BMI change after MBS between the IGB and control groups was not significantly different after 15.06 months (mean difference - 4.08, p = 0.07). Additionally, a fixed-effects analysis of ten studies found no significant difference in post-MBS complication rates between the IGB and control groups (OR 0.66, p = 0.12). Even though using IGB as a bridging approach to subsequent MBS can result in significant reductions in preoperative BMI, this weight loss does not appear to positively impact the overall outcomes of MBS in patients in the long term.

胃内球囊作为代谢和减肥手术前的桥梁:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
胃内球囊(IGB)是一种限制性手术,短期减肥效果可接受,主要并发症发生率低。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估术前植入IGB是否可以减少代谢减肥手术(MBS)后的围手术期并发症和改善减肥结果。使用相关关键词检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,将IGB研究作为MBS之前的桥梁。本研究的主要结果是比较IGB组和对照组MBS术后的体重减轻结果和并发症。对于具有严重异质性和非严重异质性的变量,分别使用随机效应和固定效应元分析。纳入了11篇文章。IGB组和对照组分别包括318例和501例患者。6项研究的合并随机效应分析显示,术前IGB植入导致体重指数(BMI)下降7.45 kg/m2,平均随访时间为6.14个月。IGB的主要并发症发生率为5%。15.06个月后,IGB组与对照组的平均BMI变化无显著差异(平均差异- 4.08,p = 0.07)。此外,对10项研究的固定效应分析发现,IGB组和对照组之间mbs后并发症发生率无显著差异(OR 0.66, p = 0.12)。尽管使用IGB作为后续MBS的桥接方法可以显著降低术前BMI,但从长期来看,这种体重减轻似乎不会对患者MBS的总体结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信