Walter M Jongbloed, Hillary A Newsome, Lawrence Kashat, Kourosh Parham, Erynne A Faucett, Chia-Ling Kuo, Kelin Zhong, Katherine R Kavanagh
{"title":"The Influence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity on the Otolaryngology Residency Experience.","authors":"Walter M Jongbloed, Hillary A Newsome, Lawrence Kashat, Kourosh Parham, Erynne A Faucett, Chia-Ling Kuo, Kelin Zhong, Katherine R Kavanagh","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the influence of sexual orientation and gender on residents' experiences in US Otolaryngology residency programs. This study assesses the prevalence of bullying, sexual harassment, discrimination, homophobic remarks and evaluates the workplace environment, well-being, and impact of LGBTQ+ residents/faculty on rank list.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A 26-question REDCap survey was distributed to all US Otolaryngology residencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was distributed to program directors over three months. Responses were compared between groups (sexual orientation and gender) using Fisher's exact test (5% significance level).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 5.9% (104 responses), 15.5% identified as LGBTQ+. LGBTQ+ residents felt less comfortable disclosing relationships to attendings than heterosexuals (68.8% versus 85.3%, <i>P</i> = .005). LGBTQ+ and female respondents perceived a worse residency environment (<i>P</i> < .05). LGBTQ+ residents were less satisfied with their decision to pursue Otolaryngology (75% vs 95.4%, <i>P</i> = .044) and more likely to consider leaving their program (25% vs 6.9%; <i>P</i> = .047). An LGBTQ+ faculty member or resident positively impacted rank lists for LGBTQ+ residents (43.8% vs 12.6%, <i>P</i> = .007; 50% vs 16.1% <i>P</i> = .005). Women reported more discrimination and sexual harassment than men (78.4% vs 14.8%; <i>P</i> < .001; 31.9% vs 11.1%; <i>P</i> = .014, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LGBTQ+ and female respondents perceive a worse residency environment. LGBTQ+ residents are less comfortable disclosing relationships to attendings, less satisfied with their decision to pursue Otolaryngology, more likely to consider leaving programs, and desire representation. Women are at increased risk of sexual harassment and discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e70095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study examines the influence of sexual orientation and gender on residents' experiences in US Otolaryngology residency programs. This study assesses the prevalence of bullying, sexual harassment, discrimination, homophobic remarks and evaluates the workplace environment, well-being, and impact of LGBTQ+ residents/faculty on rank list.
Study design: A 26-question REDCap survey was distributed to all US Otolaryngology residencies.
Methods: The survey was distributed to program directors over three months. Responses were compared between groups (sexual orientation and gender) using Fisher's exact test (5% significance level).
Results: The response rate was 5.9% (104 responses), 15.5% identified as LGBTQ+. LGBTQ+ residents felt less comfortable disclosing relationships to attendings than heterosexuals (68.8% versus 85.3%, P = .005). LGBTQ+ and female respondents perceived a worse residency environment (P < .05). LGBTQ+ residents were less satisfied with their decision to pursue Otolaryngology (75% vs 95.4%, P = .044) and more likely to consider leaving their program (25% vs 6.9%; P = .047). An LGBTQ+ faculty member or resident positively impacted rank lists for LGBTQ+ residents (43.8% vs 12.6%, P = .007; 50% vs 16.1% P = .005). Women reported more discrimination and sexual harassment than men (78.4% vs 14.8%; P < .001; 31.9% vs 11.1%; P = .014, respectively).
Conclusion: LGBTQ+ and female respondents perceive a worse residency environment. LGBTQ+ residents are less comfortable disclosing relationships to attendings, less satisfied with their decision to pursue Otolaryngology, more likely to consider leaving programs, and desire representation. Women are at increased risk of sexual harassment and discrimination.
目的:探讨性取向和性别对美国耳鼻喉科住院医师体验的影响。本研究评估了欺凌、性骚扰、歧视、恐同言论的普遍程度,并评估了LGBTQ+居民/教师的工作环境、幸福感和影响。研究设计:一份包含26个问题的REDCap调查被分发给所有美国耳鼻喉科住院医师。方法:在三个月的时间内将调查问卷分发给项目主管。使用Fisher精确检验(5%显著性水平)比较各组(性取向和性别)的反应。结果:问卷回复率为5.9%(104份),其中15.5%为LGBTQ+。LGBTQ+居民比异性恋者更不愿意向主治医生透露自己的关系(68.8%对85.3%,P = 0.005)。LGBTQ+和女性受访者认为居住环境更差(P P = 0.044),更有可能考虑离开他们的项目(25% vs 6.9%;p = .047)。LGBTQ+教职员工或住院医师对LGBTQ+住院医师的排名产生积极影响(43.8% vs 12.6%, P = .007;50% vs 16.1% P = 0.005)。女性比男性报告更多的歧视和性骚扰(78.4%比14.8%;p =。014年,分别)。结论:LGBTQ+和女性受访者认为居住环境更差。LGBTQ+住院医生不太愿意向主治医生透露自己的关系,对自己选择耳鼻喉科的决定不太满意,更有可能考虑离开项目,并渴望得到代表。妇女遭受性骚扰和歧视的风险增加。