Evaluation of Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy and Health Outcomes Among Adults Over the Age of 50 in Low-Income, Public Housing in New York City, 2015-2022.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elle Anastasiou, Lorna E Thorpe, Katarzyna Wyka, Brian Elbel, Donna Shelley, Sue Kaplan, Jonathan Burke, Byoungjun Kim, Jonathan Newman, Andrea R Titus
{"title":"Evaluation of Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy and Health Outcomes Among Adults Over the Age of 50 in Low-Income, Public Housing in New York City, 2015-2022.","authors":"Elle Anastasiou, Lorna E Thorpe, Katarzyna Wyka, Brian Elbel, Donna Shelley, Sue Kaplan, Jonathan Burke, Byoungjun Kim, Jonathan Newman, Andrea R Titus","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective July 2018, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a rule requiring all public housing authorities to implement smoke-free housing (SFH) policies in their developments. We examined the differential impacts of SFH policy on hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke among adults aged ≥50 years old living in New York City (NYC) Housing Authority (NYCHA) versus a matched-comparison population in NYC.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>We identified census block groups (CBGs) comprised solely of 100% NYCHA units (N = 160) and compared NYCHA CBGs to a selected subset of CBGs from all CBGs with no NYCHA units (N = 5646). We employed propensity score matching on distributions of key CBG-level sociodemographic and housing covariates. We constructed incident rates per 1000 persons by aggregating 3-month \"quarterly\" counts of New York State all-payer hospitalization data from October 2015 to December 2022 and dividing by the population aged ≥50 in selected CBGs, ascertained from 2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. We selected a difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach to examine pre- and post-policy differences in incident hospitalizations between the intervention and matched-comparison groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Matching results indicated a balanced match for all covariates, with standardized mean differences <0.10. In DID analyses, we observed small declines in both MI (DID = -0.26, p = .02) and stroke (DID = -0.28, p = .06) hospitalization rates for NYCHA CBGs compared to non-NYCHA CBGs from pre-to post-54 months' policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SFH policies in NYC were associated with small reductions in CVD-related hospitalizations among older adults living in housing subject to the policy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Housing remains a key focal setting for interventions to reduce SHS exposure and associated morbidities. Ongoing monitoring is warranted to understand the long-term impacts of SFH policies in public housing developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective July 2018, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a rule requiring all public housing authorities to implement smoke-free housing (SFH) policies in their developments. We examined the differential impacts of SFH policy on hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke among adults aged ≥50 years old living in New York City (NYC) Housing Authority (NYCHA) versus a matched-comparison population in NYC.

Aims and methods: We identified census block groups (CBGs) comprised solely of 100% NYCHA units (N = 160) and compared NYCHA CBGs to a selected subset of CBGs from all CBGs with no NYCHA units (N = 5646). We employed propensity score matching on distributions of key CBG-level sociodemographic and housing covariates. We constructed incident rates per 1000 persons by aggregating 3-month "quarterly" counts of New York State all-payer hospitalization data from October 2015 to December 2022 and dividing by the population aged ≥50 in selected CBGs, ascertained from 2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. We selected a difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach to examine pre- and post-policy differences in incident hospitalizations between the intervention and matched-comparison groups.

Results: Matching results indicated a balanced match for all covariates, with standardized mean differences <0.10. In DID analyses, we observed small declines in both MI (DID = -0.26, p = .02) and stroke (DID = -0.28, p = .06) hospitalization rates for NYCHA CBGs compared to non-NYCHA CBGs from pre-to post-54 months' policy.

Conclusions: SFH policies in NYC were associated with small reductions in CVD-related hospitalizations among older adults living in housing subject to the policy.

Implications: Housing remains a key focal setting for interventions to reduce SHS exposure and associated morbidities. Ongoing monitoring is warranted to understand the long-term impacts of SFH policies in public housing developments.

2015-2022年纽约市低收入公共住房中50岁以上成年人无烟住房政策与健康结果的评估
导言:自2018年7月起,美国住房和城市发展部发布了一项规定,要求所有公共住房当局在其开发项目中实施无烟住房(SFH)政策。我们研究了SFH政策对居住在纽约市(NYC)住房管理局(NYCHA)的年龄≥50岁的成年人因心肌梗死(MI)和中风住院治疗的差异影响,以及纽约市的匹配比较人群。目的和方法:我们确定了完全由NYCHA单位组成的人口普查块组(cbg) (N = 160),并将NYCHA cbg与所有没有NYCHA单位的cbg的选定子集(N = 5646)进行比较。我们对关键cbg水平的社会人口和住房协变量的分布采用倾向得分匹配。我们通过汇总2015年10月至2022年12月纽约州全付款人住院数据的3个月“季度”计数,并除以从2016年美国社区调查5年估计数确定的选定cbg中年龄≥50岁的人口,构建了每1000人的事故率。我们选择了差异中差异(DID)分析方法来检查干预组和匹配对照组之间政策前后事件住院率的差异。结果:匹配结果表明所有协变量的匹配是平衡的,具有标准化的平均差异。结论:纽约市SFH政策与居住在该政策下的住房中的老年人心血管疾病相关住院率的小幅降低有关。意义:住房仍然是减少SHS暴露和相关发病率的干预措施的关键焦点。有必要持续监察房屋及卫生局政策对公共房屋发展的长远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信