Misjudgments of Hearing Loss and Its Implications for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70101
Ayelet Hamburger, Russell Whitehead, Elias Michaelides
{"title":"Misjudgments of Hearing Loss and Its Implications for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.","authors":"Ayelet Hamburger, Russell Whitehead, Elias Michaelides","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether patients' perception of their hearing loss accurately reflects their measured hearing thresholds on their audiogram, specifically relating to a mild to moderate hearing loss, which is the determining candidacy for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Audiology clinic at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review included 232 ears from 116 patients older than 18 years seen for audiograms at our audiology clinic between 2022 and 2023. Data points were taken using the pure tone average (PTA) thresholds at 500 to 2000 Hz and the PTA thresholds at 2000 to 4000 Hz, as hearing sensitivity at these frequencies is most widely associated with speech comprehension and serves as a reliable measure of hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, when using the 2000- to 4000-Hz PTA as an indicator of the degree of hearing loss, only 52% of patients correctly quantified their level of hearing. When using the 500- to 2000-Hz PTA, 61% of patients correctly quantified their degree of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggested that individuals are frequently unable to assess their degree of hearing loss with sufficient accuracy to choose the most appropriate care. To ensure that consumers are making informed decisions about the use of OTC hearing aids, the Food and Drug Administration should consider offering additional guidance that directs patients to first seek out a more standardized measure of hearing provided by a hearing health professional. This additional direction can enhance the quality of care of OTC hearing aid consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e70101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether patients' perception of their hearing loss accurately reflects their measured hearing thresholds on their audiogram, specifically relating to a mild to moderate hearing loss, which is the determining candidacy for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids.

Study design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Audiology clinic at a tertiary care center.

Methods: This retrospective chart review included 232 ears from 116 patients older than 18 years seen for audiograms at our audiology clinic between 2022 and 2023. Data points were taken using the pure tone average (PTA) thresholds at 500 to 2000 Hz and the PTA thresholds at 2000 to 4000 Hz, as hearing sensitivity at these frequencies is most widely associated with speech comprehension and serves as a reliable measure of hearing.

Results: Overall, when using the 2000- to 4000-Hz PTA as an indicator of the degree of hearing loss, only 52% of patients correctly quantified their level of hearing. When using the 500- to 2000-Hz PTA, 61% of patients correctly quantified their degree of hearing loss.

Conclusion: This study suggested that individuals are frequently unable to assess their degree of hearing loss with sufficient accuracy to choose the most appropriate care. To ensure that consumers are making informed decisions about the use of OTC hearing aids, the Food and Drug Administration should consider offering additional guidance that directs patients to first seek out a more standardized measure of hearing provided by a hearing health professional. This additional direction can enhance the quality of care of OTC hearing aid consumers.

听力损失的误判及其对非处方助听器的影响。
目的:本研究调查患者对听力损失的感知是否准确地反映了他们在听图上测量的听力阈值,特别是与轻度至中度听力损失有关,这是决定非处方助听器(OTC)候选资格的因素。研究设计:回顾性研究。地点:三级保健中心听力学诊所。方法:本回顾性图表回顾包括来自116名18岁以上患者的232只耳朵,这些患者在2022年至2023年期间在我们的听力学诊所接受听力学图检查。数据点采用500至2000赫兹的纯音平均(PTA)阈值和2000至4000赫兹的PTA阈值,因为这些频率下的听力灵敏度与言语理解最广泛相关,是听力的可靠衡量标准。结果:总体而言,当使用2000- 4000-Hz PTA作为听力损失程度的指标时,只有52%的患者正确量化了他们的听力水平。当使用500- 2000赫兹的PTA时,61%的患者正确地量化了他们的听力损失程度。结论:本研究表明,个体往往无法充分准确地评估其听力损失程度,以选择最合适的护理。为了确保消费者对使用OTC助听器做出明智的决定,食品和药物管理局应该考虑提供额外的指导,指导患者首先寻求由听力健康专业人员提供的更标准化的听力测量。这个额外的方向可以提高OTC助听器消费者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信