Quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients in routine clinical care using the example of checkpoint inhibition therapy - A Delphi Consensus.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Philipp Ivanyi, Bernd Alt-Epping, Lars Bullinger, Anja Gesierich, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Urs Münch, Susanne Pfitzner-Dempfle, Christina Rieger, Achim Rittmeyer, Urban Wiesing, Martin Wolf, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
{"title":"Quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients in routine clinical care using the example of checkpoint inhibition therapy - A Delphi Consensus.","authors":"Philipp Ivanyi, Bernd Alt-Epping, Lars Bullinger, Anja Gesierich, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Urs Münch, Susanne Pfitzner-Dempfle, Christina Rieger, Achim Rittmeyer, Urban Wiesing, Martin Wolf, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz","doi":"10.1159/000545513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oncology has improved the long-term perspectives of many patients and is bringing the quality of life (QoL) into focus as a treatment-relevant variable. In clinical routine, standardized and reliable tools for collecting, understanding, and utilizing QoL information are needed. In the current work, an interdisciplinary consensus on aspects of QoL in standard clinical practice has been put forth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After independent, structured individual interviews with members of an interdisciplinary expert panel (n=12), ten theses on QoL with particular consideration regarding CPI therapy were drafted. These formed the basis of a multi-stage, independent, anonymous, externally commented, qualitative Delphi process. During the period 05-12/2022, the panel developed interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for recording QoL and its role in decision-making in everyday care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of ten theses, five recommendations arranged into three subject areas were agreed upon. QoL is considered a multifactorial and dynamic parameter that goes far beyond treatment-associated side effects. Mindful communication with the patient is considered the basis for QoL assessment and QoL modification. In everyday clinical practice, QoL should be documented and assessed in a structured, regular, and individualized way, thereby providing a basis for decisions on treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual QoL of cancer patients should be assessed before and throughout therapy. Especially for long-term responders of CPI therapy and in the adjuvant setting, QoL appears to be treatment relevant. The recommendations based on the Delphi method provide practical assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oncology has improved the long-term perspectives of many patients and is bringing the quality of life (QoL) into focus as a treatment-relevant variable. In clinical routine, standardized and reliable tools for collecting, understanding, and utilizing QoL information are needed. In the current work, an interdisciplinary consensus on aspects of QoL in standard clinical practice has been put forth.

Methods: After independent, structured individual interviews with members of an interdisciplinary expert panel (n=12), ten theses on QoL with particular consideration regarding CPI therapy were drafted. These formed the basis of a multi-stage, independent, anonymous, externally commented, qualitative Delphi process. During the period 05-12/2022, the panel developed interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for recording QoL and its role in decision-making in everyday care.

Results: Out of ten theses, five recommendations arranged into three subject areas were agreed upon. QoL is considered a multifactorial and dynamic parameter that goes far beyond treatment-associated side effects. Mindful communication with the patient is considered the basis for QoL assessment and QoL modification. In everyday clinical practice, QoL should be documented and assessed in a structured, regular, and individualized way, thereby providing a basis for decisions on treatment options.

Conclusion: The individual QoL of cancer patients should be assessed before and throughout therapy. Especially for long-term responders of CPI therapy and in the adjuvant setting, QoL appears to be treatment relevant. The recommendations based on the Delphi method provide practical assistance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信