Fostering communicative competence and performance of Physician Patient Relation (KPAP) - Multimodal assessment of long-term effects of a communication training programme - Study protocol of a monocentric interventional trial.
Hannah Dávid, Bernd Sonntag, Stephanie Stock, Martin Hellmich, Wolf Langewitz, Michaela Henning, Isabel Hamm, Nadine Haupt, Wolfgang Söllner, Alexander Wünsch, Barbara Stein, Frank Vitinius
{"title":"Fostering communicative competence and performance of Physician Patient Relation (KPAP) - Multimodal assessment of long-term effects of a communication training programme - Study protocol of a monocentric interventional trial.","authors":"Hannah Dávid, Bernd Sonntag, Stephanie Stock, Martin Hellmich, Wolf Langewitz, Michaela Henning, Isabel Hamm, Nadine Haupt, Wolfgang Söllner, Alexander Wünsch, Barbara Stein, Frank Vitinius","doi":"10.1159/000545681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Communication training (CT) enhances the communication skills of oncology healthcare professionals. KPAP (Kommunikative Kompetenz und Performanz in der Arzt-Patient Beziehung fördern; fostering communicative competence and performance of physician patient relation) is an intervention study that evaluates the long-term effects three years after the CTs (`communication training´) in the context of a communication training programme. It is supported by the German Cancer Aid and conducted at the University Hospital of Cologne. Methods The aim of the study will be to assess the long-term communicative competence of physicians using a multimodal approach through self-assessment and external evaluation by trained experts and trained patient raters. Prior to the study, physicians working with cancer patients underwent a structured CT. Self-reported questionnaires were completed at the beginning (T0), at the end (T1) of the 2.5-day CT, and during a six-hour refresher session (T2) several months later. Participants were recorded on video while breaking bad news (BBN) to standardised patients. As part of this study, participants will complete self-reported questionnaires at least three years after the 2.5-day CT (T3). At T3, a sub-sample of participants (at least n = 60) will be video-recorded again. These simulated BBN encounters at T0 and T3 will be rated by trained patient raters and trained experts using the Bad News Consultation Assessment Scale (AGBS) and the Consultation and Relational Empathy instrument. The primary outcome will be the difference between AGBS scores at T3 and T0. Furthermore, expert raters will analyse these videos using Discourse Coding Analysis Software and the ComOnRating Scale. Additionally, the health literacy of patient raters will be assessed using the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU). Conclusion A more precise understanding of communicative competences, particularly by incorporating the patient's perspective, will enable the development of recommendations for future training and enhance the sustainability of CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Communication training (CT) enhances the communication skills of oncology healthcare professionals. KPAP (Kommunikative Kompetenz und Performanz in der Arzt-Patient Beziehung fördern; fostering communicative competence and performance of physician patient relation) is an intervention study that evaluates the long-term effects three years after the CTs (`communication training´) in the context of a communication training programme. It is supported by the German Cancer Aid and conducted at the University Hospital of Cologne. Methods The aim of the study will be to assess the long-term communicative competence of physicians using a multimodal approach through self-assessment and external evaluation by trained experts and trained patient raters. Prior to the study, physicians working with cancer patients underwent a structured CT. Self-reported questionnaires were completed at the beginning (T0), at the end (T1) of the 2.5-day CT, and during a six-hour refresher session (T2) several months later. Participants were recorded on video while breaking bad news (BBN) to standardised patients. As part of this study, participants will complete self-reported questionnaires at least three years after the 2.5-day CT (T3). At T3, a sub-sample of participants (at least n = 60) will be video-recorded again. These simulated BBN encounters at T0 and T3 will be rated by trained patient raters and trained experts using the Bad News Consultation Assessment Scale (AGBS) and the Consultation and Relational Empathy instrument. The primary outcome will be the difference between AGBS scores at T3 and T0. Furthermore, expert raters will analyse these videos using Discourse Coding Analysis Software and the ComOnRating Scale. Additionally, the health literacy of patient raters will be assessed using the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU). Conclusion A more precise understanding of communicative competences, particularly by incorporating the patient's perspective, will enable the development of recommendations for future training and enhance the sustainability of CT.
期刊介绍:
With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.