Muscular Strength in Cancer Patients: Proposed Normative Values.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Buck W Covington, Luke Krynski, Lea Haverbeck Simon, Michael Lazio, Brooke Mattocks, Jesse Hayward, Reid Hayward
{"title":"Muscular Strength in Cancer Patients: Proposed Normative Values.","authors":"Buck W Covington, Luke Krynski, Lea Haverbeck Simon, Michael Lazio, Brooke Mattocks, Jesse Hayward, Reid Hayward","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to propose muscular strength normative data tables for the cancer population and observe the effects of exercise training on categorical placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from cancer survivors ( n = 659) encompassing various cancer types across all cancer stages were used for this study. Participants completed assessments to estimate one-repetition maximum (1RM) for both chest press and leg press, in addition to a test of maximum effort dominant handgrip strength. Strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) and handgrip strength values were divided into categories by sex and age and compared with normative values from the apparently healthy population as reported by the American College of Sports Medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of mean SWR and handgrip strength values for the cancer population to the apparently healthy normative data resulted in each age/sex group being classified as \"average\" or lower. Of the 30 age/sex classification groups for the cancer population, 23 demonstrated mean strength values in the lowest category of their respective assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normative data derived from the apparently healthy population may not be an appropriate comparison for the cancer population and may not be sensitive enough to detect categorical improvements in muscular strength resulting from exercise training. We provide an initial data set that could serve as a first step in the development of normative strength data for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1769-1779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to propose muscular strength normative data tables for the cancer population and observe the effects of exercise training on categorical placement.

Methods: Data from cancer survivors ( n = 659) encompassing various cancer types across all cancer stages were used for this study. Participants completed assessments to estimate one-repetition maximum (1RM) for both chest press and leg press, in addition to a test of maximum effort dominant handgrip strength. Strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) and handgrip strength values were divided into categories by sex and age and compared with normative values from the apparently healthy population as reported by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Results: Comparison of mean SWR and handgrip strength values for the cancer population to the apparently healthy normative data resulted in each age/sex group being classified as "average" or lower. Of the 30 age/sex classification groups for the cancer population, 23 demonstrated mean strength values in the lowest category of their respective assessment.

Conclusions: Normative data derived from the apparently healthy population may not be an appropriate comparison for the cancer population and may not be sensitive enough to detect categorical improvements in muscular strength resulting from exercise training. We provide an initial data set that could serve as a first step in the development of normative strength data for this population.

癌症患者的肌肉力量:建议的规范值。
摘要:随着基于肿瘤的运动康复的越来越多的实施,有必要针对癌症人群制定规范的力量值。目的:提出癌症人群肌肉力量规范性数据表,观察运动训练对分类定位的影响。方法:本研究使用了来自癌症幸存者(n = 659)的数据,涵盖了所有癌症阶段的各种癌症类型。参与者完成了对胸压和腿压的一次最大重复量(1RM)的评估,以及对最大努力优势握力的测试。力量重量比(SWR)和握力值按性别和年龄划分,并与美国运动医学学院报告的明显健康人群的规范值进行比较。结果:癌症人群的平均SWR和握力值与明显健康的规范数据的比较导致每个年龄/性别组被归类为“平均”或更低。在癌症人群的30个年龄/性别分类组中,23个在各自评估的最低类别中显示出平均强度值。结论:从表面上健康的人群中获得的标准数据可能不是癌症人群的适当比较,也可能不够敏感,无法发现运动训练导致的肌肉力量的分类改善。我们提供了一个初始数据集,可以作为该人群规范强度数据发展的第一步。关键词:力量重量比,握力,肿瘤学,规范数据,运动训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信