Precision in Access: The Laser Direct Alignment Radiation Reduction Technique Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Renal Access.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zhamshid Okhunov, Alphie Rotinsulu, Ala'a Farkouh, Rose Leu, Grant Sajdak, Matthew Buell, Akin S Amasyali, Kanha Shete, Vance Gentry, Udochukwu Oyoyo, David S Benjamin, D Duane Baldwin
{"title":"Precision in Access: The Laser Direct Alignment Radiation Reduction Technique <i>Versus</i> Conventional Fluoroscopic Renal Access.","authors":"Zhamshid Okhunov, Alphie Rotinsulu, Ala'a Farkouh, Rose Leu, Grant Sajdak, Matthew Buell, Akin S Amasyali, Kanha Shete, Vance Gentry, Udochukwu Oyoyo, David S Benjamin, D Duane Baldwin","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> The laser direct alignment radiation reduction technique (DARRT) presents a novel approach integrating pulsed low-dose fluoroscopy, ultrasound, direct endoscopic visualization, and laser targeting to minimize fluoroscopy exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser DARRT in comparison with traditional fluoroscopic PCNL access. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCNL. Patients with pre-existing nephrostomy tubes for access and those who underwent solely ultrasound-guided access were excluded from the study. The primary outcomes of the study were comparing fluoroscopy time used for renal access and total fluoroscopy time between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included relative stone-free rates (SFR) defined as ≤4 mm fragments on postoperative computed tomography scan and complication rates. Continuous variables were compared using an independent-sample <i>t</i> test, whereas categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 292 patients were eligible for the study. The laser DARRT reduced both access fluoroscopy time (10.8 <i>vs</i> 551.7 seconds; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and total fluoroscopy time (21.8 <i>vs</i> 597.7 seconds; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The relative SFR was significantly higher in the laser DARRT group compared with the conventional group (84.1% <i>vs</i> 64.1%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The laser DARRT led to a >95% reduction in access and total fluoroscopy times. By combining the advantages of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, endoscopic vision, and laser guidance, this technique represents a promising option for improving outcomes and minimizing radiation-related risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: The laser direct alignment radiation reduction technique (DARRT) presents a novel approach integrating pulsed low-dose fluoroscopy, ultrasound, direct endoscopic visualization, and laser targeting to minimize fluoroscopy exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser DARRT in comparison with traditional fluoroscopic PCNL access. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCNL. Patients with pre-existing nephrostomy tubes for access and those who underwent solely ultrasound-guided access were excluded from the study. The primary outcomes of the study were comparing fluoroscopy time used for renal access and total fluoroscopy time between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included relative stone-free rates (SFR) defined as ≤4 mm fragments on postoperative computed tomography scan and complication rates. Continuous variables were compared using an independent-sample t test, whereas categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 292 patients were eligible for the study. The laser DARRT reduced both access fluoroscopy time (10.8 vs 551.7 seconds; p < 0.001) and total fluoroscopy time (21.8 vs 597.7 seconds; p < 0.001). The relative SFR was significantly higher in the laser DARRT group compared with the conventional group (84.1% vs 64.1%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The laser DARRT led to a >95% reduction in access and total fluoroscopy times. By combining the advantages of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, endoscopic vision, and laser guidance, this technique represents a promising option for improving outcomes and minimizing radiation-related risk.

通道的精确性:激光直接对准辐射复位技术与传统透视肾通道的比较。
简介和目的:激光直接对准辐射降低技术(DARRT)提出了一种结合脉冲低剂量透视、超声、直接内镜可视化和激光靶向的新方法,以减少经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中透视暴露的风险。本研究旨在评价激光DARRT与传统透视PCNL入路的安全性和有效性。方法:对行PCNL的患者进行回顾性分析。预先存在肾造口管的患者和仅接受超声引导的患者被排除在研究之外。该研究的主要结果是比较两组用于肾脏通路的透视时间和总透视时间。次要结果包括相对无结石率(SFR),定义为术后计算机断层扫描≤4mm碎片和并发症发生率。连续变量的比较采用独立样本t检验,分类变量的比较采用卡方检验,显著性设置为p < 0.05。结果:共有292例患者符合研究条件。激光DARRT缩短了两组透视时间(10.8 vs 551.7秒;P < 0.001)和总透视时间(21.8 vs 597.7秒;P < 0.001)。激光DARRT组的相对SFR明显高于常规组(84.1% vs 64.1%;P < 0.001)。两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:激光DARRT可使入路和总透视次数减少约95%。通过结合透视、超声、内窥镜视觉和激光引导的优势,该技术代表了改善结果和最小化辐射相关风险的有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信