Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerda, Andrea Llovet-Rausell, Jaime Beltrán-Sanz, Kangjun Li, Julio Baviera-Sabater, Fernando Llovet-Osuna
{"title":"Flap Loss in More Than 1 Million LASIK Procedures: Incidence, Management, and Visual Outcomes.","authors":"Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerda, Andrea Llovet-Rausell, Jaime Beltrán-Sanz, Kangjun Li, Julio Baviera-Sabater, Fernando Llovet-Osuna","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the incidence of flap loss in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), management of this complication, and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, multisurgeon, single-protocol, retrospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone LASIK and experienced flap loss. Patients were operated on using a Moria LSKONE or a Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK microkeratome (Microtech Inc, Moria Ophthalmic Instruments). The study assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (accuracy to the intended target), safety (change in Snellen lines of CDVA), and efficacy (difference between UDVA and CDVA). A control group was created to compare refractive outcomes, predictability, safety, and efficacy for eyes with flap loss and patients whose LASIK procedure was free of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 1,008,849 eyes. Flap loss occurred in 16 eyes from 16 patients. Patients received topical mitomycin C (MMC) after flap loss in 9 cases (7 did not receive MMC). A bandage contact lens was applied in all 9 cases. Mean UDVA was significantly worse in the group of patients with a flap loss (<i>P</i> = .013), although the difference in CDVA was not (<i>P</i> = .077). Both the mean efficacy index and the mean safety index were significantly worse in patients with flap loss (<i>P</i> = .004 and .02, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flap loss is an extremely rare complication after LASIK. It can be managed with MMC and a bandage contact lens, with a reasonable safety index and visual outcomes. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(4):e318-e324.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 4","pages":"e318-e324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the incidence of flap loss in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), management of this complication, and visual outcomes.
Methods: This multicenter, multisurgeon, single-protocol, retrospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone LASIK and experienced flap loss. Patients were operated on using a Moria LSKONE or a Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK microkeratome (Microtech Inc, Moria Ophthalmic Instruments). The study assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (accuracy to the intended target), safety (change in Snellen lines of CDVA), and efficacy (difference between UDVA and CDVA). A control group was created to compare refractive outcomes, predictability, safety, and efficacy for eyes with flap loss and patients whose LASIK procedure was free of complications.
Results: The analysis included 1,008,849 eyes. Flap loss occurred in 16 eyes from 16 patients. Patients received topical mitomycin C (MMC) after flap loss in 9 cases (7 did not receive MMC). A bandage contact lens was applied in all 9 cases. Mean UDVA was significantly worse in the group of patients with a flap loss (P = .013), although the difference in CDVA was not (P = .077). Both the mean efficacy index and the mean safety index were significantly worse in patients with flap loss (P = .004 and .02, respectively).
Conclusions: Flap loss is an extremely rare complication after LASIK. It can be managed with MMC and a bandage contact lens, with a reasonable safety index and visual outcomes. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(4):e318-e324.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.