Long-term morbidity of peripartum hysterectomy: A systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
I A Jayawardane, D M C S Jayasundara, S D S Weliange, T D K M Jayasingha, T M S S B Madugalle, N M C L Nishshanka
{"title":"Long-term morbidity of peripartum hysterectomy: A systematic review.","authors":"I A Jayawardane, D M C S Jayasundara, S D S Weliange, T D K M Jayasingha, T M S S B Madugalle, N M C L Nishshanka","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical removal of the uterus during pregnancy or immediately post-partum is called peripartum hysterectomy. It can be pre-planned as an elective or performed as an emergency life-saving procedure for severe hemorrhage. Although rare, it is a catastrophic event leading to severe maternal morbidity and a prolonged recovery period. Besides the well-documented acute and subacute sequelae, perpartum hysterectomy may produce long-lasting physical, social, and psychological impacts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Long-term complications of peripartum hysterectomy have barely been explored or recognized. The scattered information gathered from studies involving different corners of the world has yet to be synthesized or organized into coherent clusters of evidence. Therefore, the current study aims to fill the research gap by synthesizing the best available evidence, triggering the adoption of better management strategies.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We searched the Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases. Study selection was conducted using the semi-automated tool Rayyan.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Full-text articles published up to April 22, 2024 on randomized controlled trials, qualitative studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and case reports in the English language reporting long-term complications of peripartum hysterectomy were included, while review articles, book chapters, and studies reporting poor neonatal outcomes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Data were extracted under three broad themes: long-term quality of life, psychological outcomes, and women's experiences. Data synthesis involved a thematic analysis. Study quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the qualitative nature of the evidence and the heterogeneity of study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>There were no randomized controlled trials. Eighteen studies were analyzed (eight cohorts, one case-control, one case report, one cross-sectional, and seven qualitative) with 503 peripartum hysterectomy women. Overall, all the included studies showed solid methodological quality. Peripartum hysterectomy led to profound psychological impacts, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and grief, with a fluctuating course over several months to decades. Peripartum hysterectomy significantly impaired quality of life, with declines in physical functioning, social functioning, and general mental health domains, which lasted several months to a few years. Self-narrations of women revealed breastfeeding issues, delayed emotional reactions, poor bonding with the infant, feelings of maternal failure, regrets for the loss of fertility, ongoing traumatic memories, persistent pain, dyspareunia, marital insecurity, and lack of family support, with some issues haunting them even decades later.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Traditional puerperium follow-up schedules do not meet the needs of women recovering from peripartum hysterectomy. The present study provides insights into the long-term physical, psychological, and social consequences of peripartum hysterectomy, prompting healthcare professionals to look for those actively. It may lead to early recognition of the complications, resulting in better patient-centered care and improved quality of life. Further, well-designed studies are warranted to raise awareness, plan appropriate interventions, and introduce follow-up guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical removal of the uterus during pregnancy or immediately post-partum is called peripartum hysterectomy. It can be pre-planned as an elective or performed as an emergency life-saving procedure for severe hemorrhage. Although rare, it is a catastrophic event leading to severe maternal morbidity and a prolonged recovery period. Besides the well-documented acute and subacute sequelae, perpartum hysterectomy may produce long-lasting physical, social, and psychological impacts.

Objectives: Long-term complications of peripartum hysterectomy have barely been explored or recognized. The scattered information gathered from studies involving different corners of the world has yet to be synthesized or organized into coherent clusters of evidence. Therefore, the current study aims to fill the research gap by synthesizing the best available evidence, triggering the adoption of better management strategies.

Search strategy: We searched the Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases. Study selection was conducted using the semi-automated tool Rayyan.

Selection criteria: Full-text articles published up to April 22, 2024 on randomized controlled trials, qualitative studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and case reports in the English language reporting long-term complications of peripartum hysterectomy were included, while review articles, book chapters, and studies reporting poor neonatal outcomes were excluded.

Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted under three broad themes: long-term quality of life, psychological outcomes, and women's experiences. Data synthesis involved a thematic analysis. Study quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the qualitative nature of the evidence and the heterogeneity of study outcomes.

Main results: There were no randomized controlled trials. Eighteen studies were analyzed (eight cohorts, one case-control, one case report, one cross-sectional, and seven qualitative) with 503 peripartum hysterectomy women. Overall, all the included studies showed solid methodological quality. Peripartum hysterectomy led to profound psychological impacts, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and grief, with a fluctuating course over several months to decades. Peripartum hysterectomy significantly impaired quality of life, with declines in physical functioning, social functioning, and general mental health domains, which lasted several months to a few years. Self-narrations of women revealed breastfeeding issues, delayed emotional reactions, poor bonding with the infant, feelings of maternal failure, regrets for the loss of fertility, ongoing traumatic memories, persistent pain, dyspareunia, marital insecurity, and lack of family support, with some issues haunting them even decades later.

Conclusions: Traditional puerperium follow-up schedules do not meet the needs of women recovering from peripartum hysterectomy. The present study provides insights into the long-term physical, psychological, and social consequences of peripartum hysterectomy, prompting healthcare professionals to look for those actively. It may lead to early recognition of the complications, resulting in better patient-centered care and improved quality of life. Further, well-designed studies are warranted to raise awareness, plan appropriate interventions, and introduce follow-up guidelines.

围产期子宫切除术的长期发病率:一项系统综述。
背景:在妊娠期或产后立即切除子宫的手术称为围产期子宫切除术。它可以是事先计划好的选择性手术,也可以是严重大出血时的紧急救命手术。尽管这种情况很少见,但它是一种灾难性的事件,会导致产妇严重的发病率和较长的恢复期。除了证据确凿的急性和亚急性后遗症外,围产期子宫切除术还可能对身体、社会和心理造成长期影响:目的:围产期子宫切除术的长期并发症几乎未被探讨或认识。从世界不同角落的研究中收集到的零散信息尚未综合或组织成连贯的证据集群。因此,本研究旨在通过综合现有的最佳证据来填补研究空白,从而促使采用更好的管理策略:我们检索了 Embase、PubMed、Science Direct 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。检索策略:我们检索了 Embase、PubMed、Science Direct 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,并使用半自动工具 Rayyan 进行了研究筛选:纳入截至 2024 年 4 月 22 日发表的有关随机对照试验、定性研究、队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究以及报告围产期子宫切除术长期并发症的英文病例报告的全文文章,同时排除综述文章、书籍章节以及报告不良新生儿结局的研究:数据提取分为三大主题:长期生活质量、心理结果和妇女的经历。数据综合包括专题分析。研究质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和批判性评估技能计划(CASP)工具进行。由于证据的定性性质和研究结果的异质性,没有进行 Meta 分析:没有随机对照试验。共分析了 18 项研究(8 项队列研究、1 项病例对照研究、1 项病例报告研究、1 项横断面研究和 7 项定性研究),涉及 503 名围产期子宫切除的妇女。总体而言,所有纳入的研究都显示出扎实的方法质量。围产期子宫切除术对心理造成了深远的影响,包括创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁、焦虑和悲伤,其过程在数月至数十年间起伏不定。围产期子宫切除术严重损害了生活质量,身体机能、社会功能和一般心理健康领域均出现下降,持续数月至数年不等。妇女的自述显示了母乳喂养问题、延迟的情绪反应、与婴儿的亲子关系差、孕产失败感、对失去生育能力的遗憾、持续的创伤记忆、持续的疼痛、排便困难、婚姻不安全感以及缺乏家庭支持,有些问题甚至在几十年后仍困扰着她们:结论:传统的产后随访计划不能满足围产期子宫切除术后妇女的需求。本研究为围产期子宫切除术的长期生理、心理和社会后果提供了见解,促使医护人员积极寻找这些后果。这可能会导致对并发症的早期识别,从而带来更好的以患者为中心的护理和生活质量的提高。此外,还需要进行精心设计的研究,以提高人们的认识,规划适当的干预措施,并引入后续指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信