A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effects of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum in reducing perioperative bleeding.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rula Iskander, Manal Massalha, Chen Remer, Ido Izhaki, Raed Salim
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effects of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum in reducing perioperative bleeding.","authors":"Rula Iskander, Manal Massalha, Chen Remer, Ido Izhaki, Raed Salim","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative prophylactic balloon occlusion (PPBO) of internal iliac arteries (IIAs) in placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been widely used as a preventive adjuvant technique to reduce blood loss and to preserve fertility. Nevertheless, the efficacy of PPBO is based primarily on retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effectiveness of PPBO of the IIAs in placenta previa and PAS in reducing perioperative bleeding.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which the use of PPBO on the IIAs was compared to non-use.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was number of packed red blood cell (RBC) units transfused. We executed meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool. The GRADE criteria were used to assess evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of 164 reports identified, three RCTs representing 167 women (83 and 84 in the intervention and control groups, respectively) were eligible. Mean number of RBC units transfused was 4.52 ± 1.70 and 3.70 ± 1.88 in the intervention and control groups, respectively (weighted mean difference, 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52-1.55; P = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%; low certainty evidence). Transfusion of other blood products was comparable. Incidence of postoperative fever was higher (P =  0.024) and hospitalization duration was longer (P = 0.001) in the intervention group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of PPBO of the IIAs in placenta previa and PAS was associated with increase in number of RBC units transfused.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative prophylactic balloon occlusion (PPBO) of internal iliac arteries (IIAs) in placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been widely used as a preventive adjuvant technique to reduce blood loss and to preserve fertility. Nevertheless, the efficacy of PPBO is based primarily on retrospective studies.

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of PPBO of the IIAs in placenta previa and PAS in reducing perioperative bleeding.

Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to July 2023.

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which the use of PPBO on the IIAs was compared to non-use.

Data collection and analysis: The primary outcome was number of packed red blood cell (RBC) units transfused. We executed meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool. The GRADE criteria were used to assess evidence certainty.

Main results: Of 164 reports identified, three RCTs representing 167 women (83 and 84 in the intervention and control groups, respectively) were eligible. Mean number of RBC units transfused was 4.52 ± 1.70 and 3.70 ± 1.88 in the intervention and control groups, respectively (weighted mean difference, 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52-1.55; P = 0.001; I2, 0%; low certainty evidence). Transfusion of other blood products was comparable. Incidence of postoperative fever was higher (P =  0.024) and hospitalization duration was longer (P = 0.001) in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusions: Use of PPBO of the IIAs in placenta previa and PAS was associated with increase in number of RBC units transfused.

髂内动脉球囊闭塞前置胎盘和增厚胎盘减少围手术期出血效果的随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:术前预防性球囊闭塞(PPBO)髂内动脉(IIAs)前置胎盘和胎盘增生谱(PAS)已被广泛用于预防辅助技术,以减少失血和保持生育能力。然而,PPBO的疗效主要基于回顾性研究。目的:探讨前置胎盘ias的PPBO和PAS对减少围手术期出血的效果。检索策略:检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web-of-Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从网站成立到2023年7月。选择标准:随机对照试验(RCT),在iaa上使用PPBO与未使用PPBO进行比较。数据收集和分析:主要观察指标是输血的红细胞(RBC)单位数。我们使用随机效应模型进行meta分析。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估研究的质量。GRADE标准用于评估证据的确定性。主要结果:在确定的164份报告中,有3项随机对照试验(rct)符合167名妇女(干预组和对照组分别为83名和84名)。干预组和对照组输血红细胞平均单位数分别为4.52±1.70和3.70±1.88(加权平均差为1.04;95% ci: 0.52-1.55;p = 0.001;I2, 0%;低确定性证据)。其他血液制品的输血情况也差不多。干预组术后发热发生率高于对照组(P = 0.024),住院时间长于对照组(P = 0.001)。结论:前置胎盘和PAS中使用ias的PPBO与输血红细胞单位数的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信