Craniocaudal cyclic load improves risk assessment of lumbar pedicle screw loosening: finite element analysis based on computer tomography.

IF 4.3 3区工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542352

Chenyu Jiang, Hanqiang Ouyang, Yali Li, Ning Lang, Yan Zhang, Liang Jiang, Huishu Yuan

{"title":"Craniocaudal cyclic load improves risk assessment of lumbar pedicle screw loosening: finite element analysis based on computer tomography.","authors":"Chenyu Jiang, Hanqiang Ouyang, Yali Li, Ning Lang, Yan Zhang, Liang Jiang, Huishu Yuan","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pedicle screw loosening (PSL) is a frequent complication in osteoporotic patients undergoing spinal fixation, yet effective risk assessment methods are limited. This study explores the impact of craniocaudal cyclic load on pedicle screw fixation strength using computed tomography-based finite element analysis (CT-FEA) and evaluates its predictive value for PSL.Methods: A total of 23 PSL cases (7 men and 16 women) and 29 matched controls were analyzed using CT-FEA. Both a simple axial pullout load and a pullout load with a preset craniocaudal cyclic load were applied to calculate the pullout force. Hounsfield unit (HU) values and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the screw trajectory were also assessed for osteoporosis evaluation. The pullout force and osteoporotic assessment value were compared between PSL and controls.Results: Craniocaudal cyclic loading significantly reduced the pullout force (924.3 ± 195.1 N vs. 745.2 ± 188.7 N, p < 0.0001). The PSL group had a lower pullout force under cyclic load (629.6 ± 188.2 N vs. 836.9 ± 131.6 N, p < 0.0001) and lower HU value of screw trajectories (183.7 ± 42.6 vs. 206.7 ± 29.72, p = 0.026) than controls, while simple axial pullout force and vBMD showed no significant differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that pullout force under cyclic load (AUC = 0.806) was a better predictor of PSL than HU values (AUC = 0.629).Conclusion: This study demonstrates the critical role of craniocaudal cyclic loading in pedicle screw fixation strength and its predictive value for PSL. Craniocaudal cyclic load reduces screw fixation strength significantly. Pullout force under cyclic load assessed by CT-FEA enhances the predictive accuracy for PSL risk.","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1542352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pedicle screw loosening (PSL) is a frequent complication in osteoporotic patients undergoing spinal fixation, yet effective risk assessment methods are limited. This study explores the impact of craniocaudal cyclic load on pedicle screw fixation strength using computed tomography-based finite element analysis (CT-FEA) and evaluates its predictive value for PSL.

Methods: A total of 23 PSL cases (7 men and 16 women) and 29 matched controls were analyzed using CT-FEA. Both a simple axial pullout load and a pullout load with a preset craniocaudal cyclic load were applied to calculate the pullout force. Hounsfield unit (HU) values and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the screw trajectory were also assessed for osteoporosis evaluation. The pullout force and osteoporotic assessment value were compared between PSL and controls.

Results: Craniocaudal cyclic loading significantly reduced the pullout force (924.3 ± 195.1 N vs. 745.2 ± 188.7 N, p < 0.0001). The PSL group had a lower pullout force under cyclic load (629.6 ± 188.2 N vs. 836.9 ± 131.6 N, p < 0.0001) and lower HU value of screw trajectories (183.7 ± 42.6 vs. 206.7 ± 29.72, p = 0.026) than controls, while simple axial pullout force and vBMD showed no significant differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that pullout force under cyclic load (AUC = 0.806) was a better predictor of PSL than HU values (AUC = 0.629).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the critical role of craniocaudal cyclic loading in pedicle screw fixation strength and its predictive value for PSL. Craniocaudal cyclic load reduces screw fixation strength significantly. Pullout force under cyclic load assessed by CT-FEA enhances the predictive accuracy for PSL risk.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering

CiteScore

8.30

自引率

5.30%

发文量

2270

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.