Case Report: Maintaining a balance between vascular access patency and stable dissection status in a hemodialysis patient with unrepaired type A aortic dissection.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1561645
Qiquan Lai, Ling Chen, Xuejing Gao, Hongtao Tie, Ziming Wan
{"title":"Case Report: Maintaining a balance between vascular access patency and stable dissection status in a hemodialysis patient with unrepaired type A aortic dissection.","authors":"Qiquan Lai, Ling Chen, Xuejing Gao, Hongtao Tie, Ziming Wan","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1561645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type A aortic dissection (AD) is a lethal situation with high mortality within short time after onset. We present here a rare hemodialysis patient whose condition was comorbid with unrepaired type A AD. The challenge we face is whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) should be used during dialysis.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 72-year-old man with a history of hemodialysis for 2 years and 7 months sought medical attention due to thrombosis of the dialysis catheter. He had been diagnosed with an unrepaired type A aortic dissection (involving the aortic root, the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, the descending aorta, the abdominal aorta, the left common iliac artery, and the femoral artery) for more than 5 years. LMWH was not given during the previous dialysis process because of concerns about the rupture of the dissection. The lesion was salvaged via urokinase thrombolysis. However, the anticoagulant-free dialysis pattern occasionally caused dialyzer clotting and further increased the risk of catheter dysfunction. The patient repeatedly experienced dysfunction of the catheter in the following 8 months, with 2 episodes resolved via thrombolysis and 2 episodes replaced with new catheters. Finally, LMWH was used for each dialysis session to prevent thrombosis, with the dosage gradually increasing from 1,000 units to 2,000 units. The dosage of 2,000 units could support sufficient 4-hour dialysis for each session. Twenty-five months have passed since then, the patient has not experienced any further occlusion of the catheter, and the aortic dissection has not shown obvious changes (neither obvious expansion nor rupture).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reducing the dosage of LMWH during hemodialysis is a feasible solution to maintain a balance between hemodialysis access patency and stable dissection status in this particular patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1561645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1561645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Type A aortic dissection (AD) is a lethal situation with high mortality within short time after onset. We present here a rare hemodialysis patient whose condition was comorbid with unrepaired type A AD. The challenge we face is whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) should be used during dialysis.

Case presentation: A 72-year-old man with a history of hemodialysis for 2 years and 7 months sought medical attention due to thrombosis of the dialysis catheter. He had been diagnosed with an unrepaired type A aortic dissection (involving the aortic root, the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, the descending aorta, the abdominal aorta, the left common iliac artery, and the femoral artery) for more than 5 years. LMWH was not given during the previous dialysis process because of concerns about the rupture of the dissection. The lesion was salvaged via urokinase thrombolysis. However, the anticoagulant-free dialysis pattern occasionally caused dialyzer clotting and further increased the risk of catheter dysfunction. The patient repeatedly experienced dysfunction of the catheter in the following 8 months, with 2 episodes resolved via thrombolysis and 2 episodes replaced with new catheters. Finally, LMWH was used for each dialysis session to prevent thrombosis, with the dosage gradually increasing from 1,000 units to 2,000 units. The dosage of 2,000 units could support sufficient 4-hour dialysis for each session. Twenty-five months have passed since then, the patient has not experienced any further occlusion of the catheter, and the aortic dissection has not shown obvious changes (neither obvious expansion nor rupture).

Conclusion: Reducing the dosage of LMWH during hemodialysis is a feasible solution to maintain a balance between hemodialysis access patency and stable dissection status in this particular patient.

病例报告:在未修复 A 型主动脉夹层的血液透析患者的血管通路通畅和夹层状态稳定之间保持平衡。
A型主动脉夹层(AD)是一种发病后短时间内死亡率高的致死性疾病。我们在此报告一位罕见的血液透析患者,其病情与未修复的a型AD合并症。我们面临的挑战是低分子肝素(LMWH)是否应该在透析期间使用。病例介绍:一名72岁男性,血液透析史2年7个月,因透析导管血栓形成就诊。他被诊断为未修复的A型主动脉夹层(累及主动脉根、升主动脉、主动脉弓、降主动脉、腹主动脉、左髂总动脉和股动脉)超过5年。由于担心夹层破裂,在先前的透析过程中没有给予低分子肝素。病变通过尿激酶溶栓抢救。然而,无抗凝剂的透析模式偶尔会引起透析器凝血,进一步增加导管功能障碍的风险。在接下来的8个月里,患者反复出现导管功能障碍,其中2次通过溶栓解决,2次更换新导管。最后,每次透析使用低分子肝素预防血栓形成,剂量从1000单位逐渐增加到2000单位。2000单位的剂量足以支持每次透析4小时。此后25个月,患者未发生导管进一步闭塞,主动脉夹层未出现明显变化(无明显扩张和破裂)。结论:在血液透析过程中减少低分子肝素的剂量是维持该患者血液透析通路通畅和稳定夹层状态平衡的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信