Re-defining progression in multiple sclerosis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001369
Jeffrey Lambe, Daniel Ontaneda
{"title":"Re-defining progression in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Jeffrey Lambe, Daniel Ontaneda","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), including definitions, pathological mechanisms, and evidence that progressive biology begins early in the disease course.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Definitions of MS clinical course have been refined to acknowledge the presence of both relapse and progression biology throughout the disease. Progression independent of relapse activity represents a significant proportion of disability worsening in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) disease. Progression in MS appears to be caused by the complex interplay of multiple processes, including nonresolving inflammation, microglial activation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, energetic failure, and neuro-axonal degeneration. These processes appear to begin in the earliest disease stages and their contribution to clinical phenotypes is dynamic over time. Promising results from clinical trials of tolebrutinib, in particular, underline the utility of targeting both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms to reduce disability accumulation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Pathological processes that underpin MS progression are detectable early in RRMS, evolve throughout the disease course and correlate with disability accumulation. Progression in MS should not be defined dichotomously - the focus instead should be on recognizing progressive components based on clinical measures and biomarkers early in the disease to better individualize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), including definitions, pathological mechanisms, and evidence that progressive biology begins early in the disease course.

Recent findings: Definitions of MS clinical course have been refined to acknowledge the presence of both relapse and progression biology throughout the disease. Progression independent of relapse activity represents a significant proportion of disability worsening in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) disease. Progression in MS appears to be caused by the complex interplay of multiple processes, including nonresolving inflammation, microglial activation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, energetic failure, and neuro-axonal degeneration. These processes appear to begin in the earliest disease stages and their contribution to clinical phenotypes is dynamic over time. Promising results from clinical trials of tolebrutinib, in particular, underline the utility of targeting both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms to reduce disability accumulation.

Summary: Pathological processes that underpin MS progression are detectable early in RRMS, evolve throughout the disease course and correlate with disability accumulation. Progression in MS should not be defined dichotomously - the focus instead should be on recognizing progressive components based on clinical measures and biomarkers early in the disease to better individualize treatment strategies.

重新定义多发性硬化的进展。
综述目的:本文的目的是概述多发性硬化症(MS)的进展,包括定义、病理机制和进展生物学在病程早期开始的证据。最近的发现:MS临床病程的定义已经被改进,以承认在整个疾病中存在复发和进展生物学。在复发-缓解型MS (RRMS)疾病中,独立于复发活动的进展代表了残疾恶化的重要比例。多发性硬化症的进展似乎是由多个过程的复杂相互作用引起的,包括非溶解性炎症、小胶质细胞激活、氧化应激、线粒体功能障碍、能量衰竭和神经轴突变性。这些过程似乎始于最早的疾病阶段,它们对临床表型的贡献随着时间的推移是动态的。特别是,tolebrutinib临床试验的令人乐观的结果强调了靶向先天和适应性免疫机制以减少残疾积累的效用。总结:支持MS进展的病理过程在RRMS早期可检测到,在整个病程中不断发展,并与残疾积累相关。多发性硬化症的进展不应该被一分为二地定义——相反,重点应该是在疾病早期基于临床测量和生物标志物识别进展成分,以更好地个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信