Comparing STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG Tests in RRMS to Assess PML Risk.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Aurora Zanghì, Fabiana Marinelli, Paola Sofia Di Filippo, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D'Amico
{"title":"Comparing STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG Tests in RRMS to Assess PML Risk.","authors":"Aurora Zanghì, Fabiana Marinelli, Paola Sofia Di Filippo, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D'Amico","doi":"10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but potentially fatal opportunistic infection of the Central Nervous System caused by the J.C. virus (JCV), remains a primary concern associated with natalizumab therapy in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study compared two tests, STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, and IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV IgG, for assessing the risk of PML in patients diagnosed with relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who had received disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with branded natalizumab (Tysabri®). The main objective was to determine the comparability of these tests in classifying PML risk. Eligible patients were selected from a database, and all specimens for the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG tests were collected on the same day. Patients were classified into three risk categories (low, intermediate, or high) based on threshold values for each test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed 85.5% agreement between the two tests for risk classification. Ten discordant cases were identified, mainly between intermediate- and high-risk categories. Compared to STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, IMMUNOWELL™ tended to categorize more patients as higher risk. No significant association was found between discordance and prior use of immunosuppressant drugs and >24 doses of natalizumab. The agreement between tests, assessed with the weighted Kappa coefficient, was moderate (κ=0.6222).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, the IMMUNOWELL™ JCV test tends to place more patients in higher risk categories. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these differences in PML risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but potentially fatal opportunistic infection of the Central Nervous System caused by the J.C. virus (JCV), remains a primary concern associated with natalizumab therapy in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Materials and methods: This study compared two tests, STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, and IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV IgG, for assessing the risk of PML in patients diagnosed with relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who had received disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with branded natalizumab (Tysabri®). The main objective was to determine the comparability of these tests in classifying PML risk. Eligible patients were selected from a database, and all specimens for the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG tests were collected on the same day. Patients were classified into three risk categories (low, intermediate, or high) based on threshold values for each test.

Results: The analysis showed 85.5% agreement between the two tests for risk classification. Ten discordant cases were identified, mainly between intermediate- and high-risk categories. Compared to STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, IMMUNOWELL™ tended to categorize more patients as higher risk. No significant association was found between discordance and prior use of immunosuppressant drugs and >24 doses of natalizumab. The agreement between tests, assessed with the weighted Kappa coefficient, was moderate (κ=0.6222).

Conclusions: Compared to the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, the IMMUNOWELL™ JCV test tends to place more patients in higher risk categories. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these differences in PML risk assessment.

背景:进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML)是一种由J.C.病毒(JCV)引起的罕见但可能致命的中枢神经系统机会性感染,其发病风险仍然是纳他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症(MS)患者临床管理中的一个主要问题:本研究比较了 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 和 IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV IgG 两种检测方法,以评估接受过品牌纳他珠单抗 (Tysabri®) 疾病缓解疗法 (DMT) 的复发性多发性硬化症 (RRMS) 患者的 PML 风险。研究的主要目的是确定这些检验在分类 PML 风险方面的可比性。符合条件的患者是从数据库中挑选出来的,STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 和 IMMUNOWELL™ JCV IgG 检测的所有标本都是在同一天采集的。根据每项检测的阈值将患者分为三个风险类别(低、中、高):结果:分析表明,两种检测方法在风险分类上的一致性为 85.5%。发现了 10 个不一致的病例,主要介于中危和高危类别之间。与 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 相比,IMMUNOWELL™ 倾向于将更多患者归为高风险。在不一致性与之前使用免疫抑制剂和纳他珠单抗剂量大于 24 次之间没有发现明显的关联。根据加权卡帕系数评估,测试之间的一致性为中等(κ=0.6222):结论:与 STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ 相比,IMMUNOWELL™ JCV 检测倾向于将更多患者归入高风险类别。此外,还需要进行纵向研究,以评估这些差异对 PML 风险评估的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Neuropharmacology
Current Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience. The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信