Direct Regional Comparison of Whole-Body DXA and Whole-Body CT Measurements of Fat Mass and Fat-Free Mass in Limbs and Abdomen.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jiseon Oh, Hee-Dong Chae, Hye Jin Yoo, Ja-Young Choi, Sung Hwan Hong
{"title":"Direct Regional Comparison of Whole-Body DXA and Whole-Body CT Measurements of Fat Mass and Fat-Free Mass in Limbs and Abdomen.","authors":"Jiseon Oh, Hee-Dong Chae, Hye Jin Yoo, Ja-Young Choi, Sung Hwan Hong","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and abdomen using whole-body DXA and compare them with whole-body CT, emphasizing precise regional comparisons to demonstrate the correlation between the methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight healthy adults (aged 20-69) who underwent both whole-body DXA and whole-body CT were included in this study. The CT scans included the entire body except the head, and image segmentation was employed for body composition analysis. Total limb FM, FFM, segmental abdominal FM, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured from both DXA and CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DXA-derived total limb FM and segmental abdominal FM were significantly lower than the CT-derived FM, whereas the DXA-derived total limb FFM was higher than the CT-derived FFM (p < 0.001). Despite these differences, very strong positive correlations were observed between DXA and CT for total limb FM (r = 0.951), total limb FFM (r = 0.992), and segmental abdominal FM (r = 0.984) (p < 0.001). The correlation for VAT was also strong (r = 0.861) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated very strong correlation in direct regional comparisons between whole-body DXA and CT, supporting the reliability of DXA for analysing FM and FFM in the limbs and abdomen.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>We compared FM and FFM in the limbs and abdomen between whole-body DXA and CT through a region-by-region comparison, demonstrating a more direct correlation between the two methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To measure fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and abdomen using whole-body DXA and compare them with whole-body CT, emphasizing precise regional comparisons to demonstrate the correlation between the methods.

Methods: Fifty-eight healthy adults (aged 20-69) who underwent both whole-body DXA and whole-body CT were included in this study. The CT scans included the entire body except the head, and image segmentation was employed for body composition analysis. Total limb FM, FFM, segmental abdominal FM, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured from both DXA and CT.

Results: The DXA-derived total limb FM and segmental abdominal FM were significantly lower than the CT-derived FM, whereas the DXA-derived total limb FFM was higher than the CT-derived FFM (p < 0.001). Despite these differences, very strong positive correlations were observed between DXA and CT for total limb FM (r = 0.951), total limb FFM (r = 0.992), and segmental abdominal FM (r = 0.984) (p < 0.001). The correlation for VAT was also strong (r = 0.861) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated very strong correlation in direct regional comparisons between whole-body DXA and CT, supporting the reliability of DXA for analysing FM and FFM in the limbs and abdomen.

Advances in knowledge: We compared FM and FFM in the limbs and abdomen between whole-body DXA and CT through a region-by-region comparison, demonstrating a more direct correlation between the two methods.

全身DXA和全身CT测量四肢和腹部脂肪量和无脂肪量的直接区域比较。
目的:利用全身DXA测量四肢和腹部的脂肪质量(FM)和无脂质量(FFM),并与全身CT进行比较,强调精确的区域比较,以证明方法之间的相关性。方法:58名健康成人(20-69岁)接受了全身DXA和全身CT检查。CT扫描包括除头部外的整个身体,采用图像分割进行身体成分分析。通过DXA和CT测量全肢FM、FFM、腹部节段FM和内脏脂肪组织(VAT)。结果:DXA衍生的全肢体FM和腹部节段FM明显低于CT衍生的FM,而DXA衍生的全肢体FFM高于CT衍生的FFM (p)结论:我们的研究表明,全身DXA与CT之间的直接区域比较具有很强的相关性,支持DXA分析四肢和腹部FM和FFM的可靠性。知识进展:我们通过逐区比较全身DXA和CT在四肢和腹部的FM和FFM,证明了两种方法之间更直接的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信