Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shi Hui Goh, Riley Batchelor, Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, Stacey Peters, Dion Stub, Christopher Reid, William Chan, Danny Liew, William Wilson, Jeffrey Lefkovits
{"title":"Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice.","authors":"Shi Hui Goh, Riley Batchelor, Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, Stacey Peters, Dion Stub, Christopher Reid, William Chan, Danny Liew, William Wilson, Jeffrey Lefkovits","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Preloading is the practice of administering both aspirin and a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor before PCI. DAPT preloading is common practice, however clinical trial evidence demonstrating benefit is lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to examine the prevalence and associated clinical outcomes of DAPT before PCI for ACS in a contemporary population of Australian patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on consecutive PCI procedures from patients included in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) from 2014 to 2021 was collected and stratified by administration of DAPT before PCI versus single, or no, antiplatelet therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42,453 consecutive PCI procedures for ACS were included. Of these, 33,520 (79%) patients were either preloaded or already on DAPT before PCI. Patients on DAPT were younger (63.9 vs. 65.1, p < 0.001) and generally had fewer comorbidities. Unadjusted outcomes were more favorable with pre-loading with lower in-hospital mortality with DAPT (2.6% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001), and 30-day cardiovascular mortality (0.3% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.039). 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (5.5% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001) was similarly lower in the preloaded group. Major bleeding in hospital was less common in patients on DAPT (1.0% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). However, following adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in in-hospital or 30-day all-cause mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAPT before PCI is common in ACS but not independently associated with improvements in in-hospital mortality, MACE, or stent thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Preloading is the practice of administering both aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor before PCI. DAPT preloading is common practice, however clinical trial evidence demonstrating benefit is lacking.

Aims: This study aimed to examine the prevalence and associated clinical outcomes of DAPT before PCI for ACS in a contemporary population of Australian patients.

Methods: Data on consecutive PCI procedures from patients included in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) from 2014 to 2021 was collected and stratified by administration of DAPT before PCI versus single, or no, antiplatelet therapy.

Results: In total, 42,453 consecutive PCI procedures for ACS were included. Of these, 33,520 (79%) patients were either preloaded or already on DAPT before PCI. Patients on DAPT were younger (63.9 vs. 65.1, p < 0.001) and generally had fewer comorbidities. Unadjusted outcomes were more favorable with pre-loading with lower in-hospital mortality with DAPT (2.6% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001), and 30-day cardiovascular mortality (0.3% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.039). 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (5.5% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001) was similarly lower in the preloaded group. Major bleeding in hospital was less common in patients on DAPT (1.0% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). However, following adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in in-hospital or 30-day all-cause mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis between groups.

Conclusions: DAPT before PCI is common in ACS but not independently associated with improvements in in-hospital mortality, MACE, or stent thrombosis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信