Evaluation of the effect of reverse curved spee Ni-Ti wires with different depths in MBT and Roth brackets on mandibular teeth during leveling and alignment using finite element analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sena Yılmaz, Esra Ağaoğlu Mogul, Koray Halıcıoğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of reverse curved spee Ni-Ti wires with different depths in MBT and Roth brackets on mandibular teeth during leveling and alignment using finite element analysis.","authors":"Sena Yılmaz, Esra Ağaoğlu Mogul, Koray Halıcıoğlu","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05909-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of our study is to analyze the forces generated by reverse curve archwires with three different depths and two different dimensions for Roth-type brackets and MBT-type brackets through finite element analysis (FEA) to assess their effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study involves modeling wires of different dimensions and depths (20 mm, 25 mm and 30 mm) for Roth-type brackets with 0.018''slot size and MBT-type brackets with 0.022''slot size. 12 linear static analyses were conducted under specific loading and boundary conditions to evaluate tooth movements along the X, Y, and Z axes, total displacement, and von Mises stresses on the periodontal ligament (PDL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025''and 0.021 × 0.025'' dimensions and 30 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with 0.017 × 0.025'' and 0.016 × 0.022'' wire and 30 mm depth applied the most aggressive forces, leading to high displacement and PDL stress. In contrast, 0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025'' dimensions and 20 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 25 mm depth, 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 20 mm depth demonstrated more conservative force applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comparative analysis of 12 different models demonstrates that varying orthodontic forces have a significant impact on both tooth movement and PDL stress. These findings highlight the significance of selecting the appropriate model based on the patient's periodontal health to ensure orthodontic treatments are performed effectively and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05909-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study is to analyze the forces generated by reverse curve archwires with three different depths and two different dimensions for Roth-type brackets and MBT-type brackets through finite element analysis (FEA) to assess their effects.

Materials and methods: This study involves modeling wires of different dimensions and depths (20 mm, 25 mm and 30 mm) for Roth-type brackets with 0.018''slot size and MBT-type brackets with 0.022''slot size. 12 linear static analyses were conducted under specific loading and boundary conditions to evaluate tooth movements along the X, Y, and Z axes, total displacement, and von Mises stresses on the periodontal ligament (PDL).

Results: 0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025''and 0.021 × 0.025'' dimensions and 30 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with 0.017 × 0.025'' and 0.016 × 0.022'' wire and 30 mm depth applied the most aggressive forces, leading to high displacement and PDL stress. In contrast, 0.022 slot MBT bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.019 × 0.025'' dimensions and 20 mm depth, 0.018 slot Roth bracket with reverse curve of spee wire 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 25 mm depth, 0.017 × 0.025'', 0.016 × 0.022''and 20 mm depth demonstrated more conservative force applications.

Conclusion: This comparative analysis of 12 different models demonstrates that varying orthodontic forces have a significant impact on both tooth movement and PDL stress. These findings highlight the significance of selecting the appropriate model based on the patient's periodontal health to ensure orthodontic treatments are performed effectively and safe.

目的:我们的研究旨在通过有限元分析(FEA),分析三种不同深度和两种不同尺寸的反向曲线弓丝对罗氏型托架和 MBT 型托架产生的力,以评估其影响:本研究涉及对不同尺寸和深度(20 毫米、25 毫米和 30 毫米)的钢丝进行建模,分别用于槽尺寸为 0.018''的 Roth 型托架和槽尺寸为 0.022''的 MBT 型托架。在特定加载和边界条件下进行了 12 次线性静态分析,以评估牙齿沿 X、Y 和 Z 轴的移动、总位移以及牙周韧带 (PDL) 上的 von Mises 应力:0.022槽MBT托槽(钢丝尺寸为0.019 × 0.025''和0.021 × 0.025'',深度为30毫米)、0.018槽Roth托槽(钢丝尺寸为0.017 × 0.025''和0.016 × 0.022'',深度为30毫米)施加的力最大,导致位移和牙周韧带应力较大。相比之下,0.022 插槽 MBT 托槽(尖丝反向曲线为 0.019 × 0.025'',深度为 20 毫米)、0.018 插槽 Roth 托槽(尖丝反向曲线为 0.017 × 0.025''、0.016 × 0.022'',深度为 25 毫米)、0.017 × 0.025''、0.016 × 0.022'',深度为 20 毫米的应用力较为保守:对 12 种不同模型的比较分析表明,不同的正畸力对牙齿移动和 PDL 应力都有显著影响。这些发现强调了根据患者牙周健康状况选择合适模型的重要性,以确保正畸治疗有效、安全地进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信