Risk of hepatotoxicity in patients with gout treated with febuxostat or benzbromarone: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Wenyan Sun, Lingling Cui, Robert Terkeltaub, Ying Chen, Xinde Li, Xiaoyu Cheng, Tian Liu, Nicola Dalbeth, Changgui Li
{"title":"Risk of hepatotoxicity in patients with gout treated with febuxostat or benzbromarone: a propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Wenyan Sun, Lingling Cui, Robert Terkeltaub, Ying Chen, Xinde Li, Xiaoyu Cheng, Tian Liu, Nicola Dalbeth, Changgui Li","doi":"10.1002/acr.25547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with the use of febuxostat and benzbromarone in patients with gout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>New users of febuxostat or benzbromarone with monitoring of liver function at least three times in a year after initiation of the study drugs were identified from an electronic medical record database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups 1:1 to match for age, sex, and pre-treatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of hepatotoxicity (defined as ALT or AST >3x upper limit of normal). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age, body mass index, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,338 patients with gout were eligible. A total of 37% experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5 grade 1-3 AST/ALT abnormality. After PSM, 488 febuxostat users were matched with 488 receiving benzbromarone with a mean follow-up of 1.20 years. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was 39.6 and 16.8 per 1,000 person-years for febuxostat users and benzbromarone users, respectively. Febuxostat use was associated with a significantly greater risk of hepatotoxicity than benzbromarone (adjusted HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.28-5.91), especially in patients with elevated transaminases at baseline. Findings did not differ according to pre-specified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Febuxostat use is associated with a significantly greater risk of mild to moderate perturbation of liver function compared to benzbromarone in patients with gout.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with the use of febuxostat and benzbromarone in patients with gout.

Methods: New users of febuxostat or benzbromarone with monitoring of liver function at least three times in a year after initiation of the study drugs were identified from an electronic medical record database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups 1:1 to match for age, sex, and pre-treatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of hepatotoxicity (defined as ALT or AST >3x upper limit of normal). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age, body mass index, and comorbidities.

Results: 2,338 patients with gout were eligible. A total of 37% experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5 grade 1-3 AST/ALT abnormality. After PSM, 488 febuxostat users were matched with 488 receiving benzbromarone with a mean follow-up of 1.20 years. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was 39.6 and 16.8 per 1,000 person-years for febuxostat users and benzbromarone users, respectively. Febuxostat use was associated with a significantly greater risk of hepatotoxicity than benzbromarone (adjusted HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.28-5.91), especially in patients with elevated transaminases at baseline. Findings did not differ according to pre-specified subgroups.

Conclusion: Febuxostat use is associated with a significantly greater risk of mild to moderate perturbation of liver function compared to benzbromarone in patients with gout.

非布司他或苯溴马龙治疗痛风患者肝毒性风险:倾向评分匹配队列研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较痛风患者使用非布司他和苯溴马隆相关的肝毒性风险。方法:从电子病历数据库中确定非布司他或苯溴马龙的新使用者,并在研究药物开始后一年内监测肝功能至少三次。两组患者按年龄、性别、治疗前谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)进行1:1的倾向评分匹配(PSM)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析估计肝毒性的概率(定义为ALT或AST低于正常上限的3倍)。采用Cox回归计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。根据年龄、体重指数和合并症进行亚组分析。结果:2338例痛风患者入选。共有37%的患者经历了不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) v5级1-3级AST/ALT异常。PSM后,488名非布司他使用者与488名接受苯溴马龙的患者进行匹配,平均随访时间为1.20年。非布司他使用者和苯溴马龙使用者的肝毒性发生率分别为每1000人年39.6和16.8例。非布司他的使用与苯溴马龙的肝毒性风险显著高于苯溴马龙(校正HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.28-5.91),特别是在基线时转氨酶升高的患者中。根据预先指定的亚组,结果没有差异。结论:与苯溴马隆相比,非布司他与痛风患者轻度至中度肝功能紊乱的风险显著增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信