The San Diego Consensus for Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rena Yadlapati, Philip Weissbrod, Erin Walsh, Thomas L Carroll, Walter W Chan, Jackie Gartner-Schmidt, Livia Guadagnoli, Marie Jette, Jennifer C Myers, Ashli O'Rourke, Rami Sweis, Justin Wu, Julie M Barkmeier-Kraemer, Daniel Cates, Chien-Lin Chen, Enrique Coss-Adame, Gregory Dion, David Francis, Mami Kaneko, Jerome R Lechien, Stephanie Misono, Anais Rameau, Sabine Roman, Anne Vertigan, Yinglian Xiao, Frank Zerbib, Madeline Greytak, John E Pandolfino, C Prakash Gyawali
{"title":"The San Diego Consensus for Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.","authors":"Rena Yadlapati, Philip Weissbrod, Erin Walsh, Thomas L Carroll, Walter W Chan, Jackie Gartner-Schmidt, Livia Guadagnoli, Marie Jette, Jennifer C Myers, Ashli O'Rourke, Rami Sweis, Justin Wu, Julie M Barkmeier-Kraemer, Daniel Cates, Chien-Lin Chen, Enrique Coss-Adame, Gregory Dion, David Francis, Mami Kaneko, Jerome R Lechien, Stephanie Misono, Anais Rameau, Sabine Roman, Anne Vertigan, Yinglian Xiao, Frank Zerbib, Madeline Greytak, John E Pandolfino, C Prakash Gyawali","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently applied to aerodigestive symptoms despite lack of objective reflux evidence. The aim of this initiative was to develop a modern care paradigm for LPR supported by otolaryngology and gastroenterology disciplines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 28-member international interdisciplinary working group developed practical statements within the following domains: definition/terminology, initial diagnostic evaluation, reflux monitoring, therapeutic trials, behavioral factors and therapy, and risk stratification. Literature reviews guided statement development and were presented at virtual/in-person meetings. Each statement underwent 2 or more rounds of voting per the RAND Appropriateness Method; statements reaching appropriateness with ≥80% agreement are included as recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The term laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) applies to aerodigestive symptoms with potential to be induced by reflux and include cough, voice change, throat clearing, excess throat phlegm, and throat pain. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) refers to patients with LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Importantly, the presence of LPS does not equate to LPRD. Laryngoscopy has value in assessing for nonreflux laryngopharyngeal processes, but laryngoscopic findings alone cannot diagnose LPRD. LPS patients should be categorized as with or without concurrent esophageal reflux symptoms. While lifestyle modification and empiric trials of acid suppression ± alginates are appropriate when esophageal reflux symptoms coexist, upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring are required for LPRD diagnosis when symptoms persist, when LPS is isolated, or when management needs to be escalated to include invasive antireflux management. The two recommended ambulatory reflux monitoring modalities, 24-hour pH-impedance and 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, are not mutually exclusive with distinct roles for the evaluation of LPS. Laryngeal hyperresponsiveness and hypervigilance commonly contribute to both LPS and LPRD presentations and are responsive to laryngeal recalibration therapy and neuromodulators.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The San Diego Consensus represents the formal modern-day interdisciplinary care paradigm to evaluate and manage LPS and LPRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frequently applied to aerodigestive symptoms despite lack of objective reflux evidence. The aim of this initiative was to develop a modern care paradigm for LPR supported by otolaryngology and gastroenterology disciplines.

Methods: A 28-member international interdisciplinary working group developed practical statements within the following domains: definition/terminology, initial diagnostic evaluation, reflux monitoring, therapeutic trials, behavioral factors and therapy, and risk stratification. Literature reviews guided statement development and were presented at virtual/in-person meetings. Each statement underwent 2 or more rounds of voting per the RAND Appropriateness Method; statements reaching appropriateness with ≥80% agreement are included as recommendations.

Results: The term laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) applies to aerodigestive symptoms with potential to be induced by reflux and include cough, voice change, throat clearing, excess throat phlegm, and throat pain. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) refers to patients with LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Importantly, the presence of LPS does not equate to LPRD. Laryngoscopy has value in assessing for nonreflux laryngopharyngeal processes, but laryngoscopic findings alone cannot diagnose LPRD. LPS patients should be categorized as with or without concurrent esophageal reflux symptoms. While lifestyle modification and empiric trials of acid suppression ± alginates are appropriate when esophageal reflux symptoms coexist, upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring are required for LPRD diagnosis when symptoms persist, when LPS is isolated, or when management needs to be escalated to include invasive antireflux management. The two recommended ambulatory reflux monitoring modalities, 24-hour pH-impedance and 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, are not mutually exclusive with distinct roles for the evaluation of LPS. Laryngeal hyperresponsiveness and hypervigilance commonly contribute to both LPS and LPRD presentations and are responsive to laryngeal recalibration therapy and neuromodulators.

Discussion: The San Diego Consensus represents the formal modern-day interdisciplinary care paradigm to evaluate and manage LPS and LPRD.

圣地亚哥共识喉部症状和喉部反流病。
背景:尽管缺乏客观的反流证据,但术语“喉咽反流”(“LPR”)经常用于气消化症状。该倡议旨在为耳鼻喉科和胃肠病学学科支持的LPR发展现代护理范式。方法:一个由28名成员组成的国际跨学科工作组在以下领域制定了实用声明:定义/术语、初步诊断评估、反流监测、治疗试验、行为因素和治疗以及风险分层。文献综述指导了声明的制定,并在虚拟/面对面会议上提出。每个陈述都经过了RAND适当性方法的2轮或更多轮投票;符合≥80%的陈述被纳入推荐。结果:术语“喉咽症状”(LPS)适用于可能由反流引起的空气消化症状,包括咳嗽、声音改变、清喉、咽喉粘液过多和咽喉疼痛。“喉咽反流病”(LPRD)是指有LPS和客观证据证明有反流的患者。重要的是,LPS的存在并不等同于LPRD。喉镜检查对评估非反流性喉部病变有价值,但仅喉镜检查不能诊断LPRD。LPS患者应根据有无并发食管反流症状进行分类。当食管反流症状共存时,生活方式改变和抑酸±海藻酸盐的经验性试验是合适的,当症状持续存在、LPS被隔离或治疗需要升级到包括侵入性抗反流治疗时,LPRD诊断需要上内镜和动态反流监测。推荐的两种动态反流监测方式,24小时pH阻抗和96小时无线pH监测,在评估LPS方面并非相互排斥,具有不同的作用。喉部高反应性和高警觉性通常会导致LPS和LPRD的出现,并且对喉部再校准治疗和神经调节剂有反应。结论:圣地亚哥共识代表了正式的现代跨学科护理范式来评估和管理LPS和LPRD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信