Decoding cholesteatoma radiological dimensions: unveiling the discrepancy between CT and MRI imaging and development of a predictive model based on CT and MRI volume comparison.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Edoardo Covelli, Alessandro Bozzao, Piero Giuseppe Meliante, Chiara Filippi, Sofia Pizzolante, Haitham H Elfarargy, Andrea Romano, Maurizio Barbara
{"title":"Decoding cholesteatoma radiological dimensions: unveiling the discrepancy between CT and MRI imaging and development of a predictive model based on CT and MRI volume comparison.","authors":"Edoardo Covelli, Alessandro Bozzao, Piero Giuseppe Meliante, Chiara Filippi, Sofia Pizzolante, Haitham H Elfarargy, Andrea Romano, Maurizio Barbara","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2025.2484560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholesteatoma (CHO) presents a significant threat to middle ear integrity, potentially leading to severe complications. Radiological assessment is crucial for understanding CHO anatomy, with high-resolution CT scans commonly used despite limitations in sensitivity and size overestimation. Recent advancements in non-echo planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI offer improved sensitivity, but accessibility issues persist.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to compare CHO volume, as measured by CT scans, and the gold standard non-EPI DWI MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective clinical trial involving 39 participants with middle-ear CHO compared CT and non-EPI DWI MRI volumes. Patients underwent both imaging modalities, and volumes were measured using a co-registration technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median CHO volumes measured by MRI and CT showed a notable difference. The Bland-Altman plot indicated one outlier, removed for further analysis. Linear regression suggested a correlation, with CT volumes overestimating MRI volumes by a factor of four.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study establishes a formula to estimate CHO size, highlighting the tendency of CT scans to overestimate volumes. While non-EPI DWI MRI remains the gold standard for accurate measurements, our findings emphasize the complementary roles of CT and MRI in CHO diagnosis and post-surgical follow-up through fusion techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2484560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholesteatoma (CHO) presents a significant threat to middle ear integrity, potentially leading to severe complications. Radiological assessment is crucial for understanding CHO anatomy, with high-resolution CT scans commonly used despite limitations in sensitivity and size overestimation. Recent advancements in non-echo planar imaging (EPI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI offer improved sensitivity, but accessibility issues persist.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare CHO volume, as measured by CT scans, and the gold standard non-EPI DWI MRI.

Materials and methods: A prospective clinical trial involving 39 participants with middle-ear CHO compared CT and non-EPI DWI MRI volumes. Patients underwent both imaging modalities, and volumes were measured using a co-registration technique.

Results: Median CHO volumes measured by MRI and CT showed a notable difference. The Bland-Altman plot indicated one outlier, removed for further analysis. Linear regression suggested a correlation, with CT volumes overestimating MRI volumes by a factor of four.

Conclusions: Our study establishes a formula to estimate CHO size, highlighting the tendency of CT scans to overestimate volumes. While non-EPI DWI MRI remains the gold standard for accurate measurements, our findings emphasize the complementary roles of CT and MRI in CHO diagnosis and post-surgical follow-up through fusion techniques.

解码胆脂瘤的影像学尺寸:揭示CT和MRI成像的差异,建立基于CT和MRI体积比较的预测模型。
背景:胆脂瘤(CHO)是对中耳完整性的重大威胁,可能导致严重的并发症。放射学评估对于了解CHO解剖结构至关重要,尽管在灵敏度和尺寸高估方面存在局限性,但通常使用高分辨率CT扫描。非回波平面成像(EPI)弥散加权成像(DWI) MRI的最新进展提高了灵敏度,但可及性问题仍然存在。目的:本研究的目的是比较CT扫描测量的CHO体积和金标准非epi DWI MRI。材料和方法:一项涉及39名中耳CHO患者的前瞻性临床试验比较了CT和非epi DWI MRI体积。患者接受了两种成像方式,并使用共配准技术测量了体积。结果:MRI与CT测量CHO中位容积差异有统计学意义。Bland-Altman图显示了一个异常值,为进一步分析而删除。线性回归表明了相关性,CT体积高估了MRI体积的四倍。结论:我们的研究建立了一个估算CHO大小的公式,突出了CT扫描高估体积的趋势。虽然非epi DWI MRI仍然是准确测量的金标准,但我们的研究结果强调了CT和MRI在CHO诊断和术后融合技术随访中的互补作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信