Determinants of Pro-environmental Practices: An Analysis Using Discrete Choice Models.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Danny Granda-Beltrán, Michelle López, Jessica Guamán, Pablo Ponce
{"title":"Determinants of Pro-environmental Practices: An Analysis Using Discrete Choice Models.","authors":"Danny Granda-Beltrán, Michelle López, Jessica Guamán, Pablo Ponce","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02149-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Responsible consumption decisions are key to achieving environmental sustainability, particularly concerning pro-environmental practices. However, adopting pro-environmental practices varies and is closely linked to the diversity of individual behaviors. Therefore, this research aims to identify the factors determining pro-environmental practices such as electricity-saving, potable water-saving, and recycling in Ecuadorian households from 2010 to 2014. Secondary data from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses were utilized. The information was processed to evaluate the marginal propensity of pro-environmental practices using a logit model and a conditional multinomial logit model. Additionally, tests incorporating unobserved heterogeneity were conducted to assess the robustness of the model. The main findings confirm that the Theory of Planned Behavior explains the performance of environmental practices in Ecuadorian households. Specifically, environmental awareness accounts for the largest increase in pro-environmental practices, approximately 8% and 10%. Moreover, examining the marginal propensity of each pro-environmental practice reveals heterogeneous results. Additionally, labor income and education increase pro-environmental practices by 2.14% to 1.5%, while female-headed households show an increase of 5.68%. Conversely, evidence suggests that Indigenous ethnicity is associated with a lower likelihood of engaging in pro-environmental practices. Policy implications derived from the study suggest focusing public efforts on increasing household environmental awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02149-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responsible consumption decisions are key to achieving environmental sustainability, particularly concerning pro-environmental practices. However, adopting pro-environmental practices varies and is closely linked to the diversity of individual behaviors. Therefore, this research aims to identify the factors determining pro-environmental practices such as electricity-saving, potable water-saving, and recycling in Ecuadorian households from 2010 to 2014. Secondary data from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses were utilized. The information was processed to evaluate the marginal propensity of pro-environmental practices using a logit model and a conditional multinomial logit model. Additionally, tests incorporating unobserved heterogeneity were conducted to assess the robustness of the model. The main findings confirm that the Theory of Planned Behavior explains the performance of environmental practices in Ecuadorian households. Specifically, environmental awareness accounts for the largest increase in pro-environmental practices, approximately 8% and 10%. Moreover, examining the marginal propensity of each pro-environmental practice reveals heterogeneous results. Additionally, labor income and education increase pro-environmental practices by 2.14% to 1.5%, while female-headed households show an increase of 5.68%. Conversely, evidence suggests that Indigenous ethnicity is associated with a lower likelihood of engaging in pro-environmental practices. Policy implications derived from the study suggest focusing public efforts on increasing household environmental awareness.

亲环境实践的决定因素:使用离散选择模型的分析。
负责任的消费决定是实现环境可持续性的关键,特别是关于亲环境的做法。然而,采取亲环境的做法各不相同,并与个人行为的多样性密切相关。因此,本研究旨在确定2010年至2014年厄瓜多尔家庭节约用电、节约饮用水和回收利用等亲环境行为的影响因素。使用了国家统计和人口普查研究所的二手数据。利用logit模型和条件多项logit模型对这些信息进行处理,以评估亲环境实践的边际倾向。此外,还进行了包含未观察到的异质性的检验,以评估模型的稳健性。主要研究结果证实,计划行为理论解释了厄瓜多尔家庭环境实践的表现。具体来说,环保意识在亲环境行为中占比最大,分别约为8%和10%。此外,检查每个亲环境实践的边际倾向揭示了异质的结果。此外,劳动收入和教育使环保行为增加了2.14%至1.5%,而女性户主家庭则增加了5.68%。相反,有证据表明,土著民族参与环保活动的可能性较低。从这项研究中得出的政策启示建议将公众努力的重点放在提高家庭环境意识上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信