Spencer Finkbiner, Tarun Dalia, Joseph Mancuso, Jacob Baer, Hassan Farhoud, Keith Foster, Matthew Danter, Tyler Zorn, Jinxiang Hu, Jordan Baker, Hirak Shah, Zubair Shah, Peter Downey, Andrija Vidic
{"title":"Evaluating Heart Transplant Outcomes Using the SherpaPak Heart Storage System.","authors":"Spencer Finkbiner, Tarun Dalia, Joseph Mancuso, Jacob Baer, Hassan Farhoud, Keith Foster, Matthew Danter, Tyler Zorn, Jinxiang Hu, Jordan Baker, Hirak Shah, Zubair Shah, Peter Downey, Andrija Vidic","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a novel hypothermic organ transport device which maintains an optimal temperature range of 4-8°C during donor heart transport. Its use in many major transplant centers has increased over the last several years. We retrospectively examined 120 heart transplant patients, 60 using SCTS and 60 using traditional cold storage on ice (TCS), at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) between June 2020 and June 2023. Baseline characteristics were comparable except there were less males in TCS versus SCTS (70% vs. 85%; p = 0.049) and less diabetics (23% vs. 47%; p = 0.07). The TCS group had significantly shorter ischemic times than the SCTS group (177 vs. 204 min; p = 0.008). On analysis, no statistically significant difference was noted in primary graft dysfunction (PGD; 12% vs. 15%; p = 0.59), total length of stay (LOS; 19 vs. 17 days; p = 0.061), 1 year all-cause mortality (12% vs. 8.4%; p = 0.196), and 1 year cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV; 58% vs. 63%, p = 0.333] between these two groups. Multivariate analysis also showed no significant difference in PGD and LOS between groups. We conclude that despite having longer ischemic times in the SCTS group, the post-transplant outcomes were comparable to TCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a novel hypothermic organ transport device which maintains an optimal temperature range of 4-8°C during donor heart transport. Its use in many major transplant centers has increased over the last several years. We retrospectively examined 120 heart transplant patients, 60 using SCTS and 60 using traditional cold storage on ice (TCS), at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) between June 2020 and June 2023. Baseline characteristics were comparable except there were less males in TCS versus SCTS (70% vs. 85%; p = 0.049) and less diabetics (23% vs. 47%; p = 0.07). The TCS group had significantly shorter ischemic times than the SCTS group (177 vs. 204 min; p = 0.008). On analysis, no statistically significant difference was noted in primary graft dysfunction (PGD; 12% vs. 15%; p = 0.59), total length of stay (LOS; 19 vs. 17 days; p = 0.061), 1 year all-cause mortality (12% vs. 8.4%; p = 0.196), and 1 year cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV; 58% vs. 63%, p = 0.333] between these two groups. Multivariate analysis also showed no significant difference in PGD and LOS between groups. We conclude that despite having longer ischemic times in the SCTS group, the post-transplant outcomes were comparable to TCS.
SherpaPak心脏运输系统(SCTS)是一种新型的低温器官运输装置,在供体心脏运输过程中保持4-8°C的最佳温度范围。在过去的几年里,它在许多大型移植中心的使用有所增加。我们回顾性检查了2020年6月至2023年6月期间堪萨斯大学医学中心(KUMC)的120例心脏移植患者,60例使用SCTS, 60例使用传统的冰上冷藏(TCS)。基线特征具有可比性,除了TCS与SCTS的男性较少(70% vs 85%;P = 0.049),糖尿病患者较少(23% vs 47%;P = 0.07)。TCS组缺血时间明显短于SCTS组(177 vs. 204 min;P = 0.008)。经分析,原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD;12% vs. 15%;p = 0.59),总停留时间(LOS;19比17天;P = 0.061), 1年全因死亡率(12% vs. 8.4%;p = 0.196)和1年同种异体心脏移植血管病变(CAV;58% vs. 63%, p = 0.333]。多因素分析也显示各组间PGD和LOS无显著差异。我们得出结论,尽管SCTS组缺血时间较长,但移植后的结果与TCS相当。
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.