Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
IF 2.3 3区 医学Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nima Broomand Lomer, Armin Nouri, Roshan Singh, Sonia Asgari
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nima Broomand Lomer, Armin Nouri, Roshan Singh, Sonia Asgari","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, serves as a critical molecular biomarker with therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics as a non-invasive approach for predicting MSI status in EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses for radiomics and combined models were conducted. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Likelihood ratio scattergram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies (1650 patients) were included in the systematic review, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics model and five for combined model. The pooled diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was as follows: sensitivity, 0.66; specificity, 0.89; PLR, 5.48; NLR, 0.43; DOR, 18.56; and AUC, 0.87. For combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.58, 0.94, 7.37, 0.50, 16.43, and 0.85, respectively. Subgroup analysis of radiomics models revealed that studies employing non-linear classifiers achieved superior performance compared to those utilizing linear classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics showed promise as non-invasive tool for MSI prediction in EC, with potential clinical utility in guiding personalized treatments. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, serves as a critical molecular biomarker with therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics as a non-invasive approach for predicting MSI status in EC.
Methods: A systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses for radiomics and combined models were conducted. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Likelihood ratio scattergram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability.
Results: A total of 9 studies (1650 patients) were included in the systematic review, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics model and five for combined model. The pooled diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was as follows: sensitivity, 0.66; specificity, 0.89; PLR, 5.48; NLR, 0.43; DOR, 18.56; and AUC, 0.87. For combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.58, 0.94, 7.37, 0.50, 16.43, and 0.85, respectively. Subgroup analysis of radiomics models revealed that studies employing non-linear classifiers achieved superior performance compared to those utilizing linear classifiers.
Conclusion: Radiomics showed promise as non-invasive tool for MSI prediction in EC, with potential clinical utility in guiding personalized treatments. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits