{"title":"Past aridity and dust drove biodiversity crises and altered pollination in the ancient gymnosperm Ephedra (Gnetales).","authors":"Natasha Barbolini, Niels Meijer, Carina Hoorn, Guillaume Dupont-Nivet, Fang Han, Ashley Krüger, Qin Yuan, Alexander Rohrmann, Kristina Bolinder, Catarina Rydin","doi":"10.1111/brv.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term effects of present-day climate change on pollination are unquantified. However, distinguishing climatic drivers of ancient changes in pollination could provide valuable insights into biotic responses to near-future climate states. Herein, we show that pollination in a group of gymnosperm shrubs (Ephedra L., Gnetales) was irrevocably altered by the Cenozoic expansion of drylands on two different continents. In Asia, increased continentality during the mid-Eocene drove aridification and strong, dust-carrying storms that promoted a shift to prevailing wind pollination in the core clade of Ephedra. Surface uplift in the North American interior together with global cooling caused the expansion of aeolian deposition and placed similar evolutionary pressures on ephedras there, beginning in the latest Eocene and continuing across the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT). These climatic changes fundamentally altered the abundance and evolution of this ancient plant lineage on both continents and determined pollination mechanisms in the core clade of Ephedra today. Based on fossil evidence, this review demonstrates how climate change may have major and permanent impacts on plant-pollinator networks, as well as demonstrates possible evolutionary consequences of near-future climate scenarios for which we have no modern analogue.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The long-term effects of present-day climate change on pollination are unquantified. However, distinguishing climatic drivers of ancient changes in pollination could provide valuable insights into biotic responses to near-future climate states. Herein, we show that pollination in a group of gymnosperm shrubs (Ephedra L., Gnetales) was irrevocably altered by the Cenozoic expansion of drylands on two different continents. In Asia, increased continentality during the mid-Eocene drove aridification and strong, dust-carrying storms that promoted a shift to prevailing wind pollination in the core clade of Ephedra. Surface uplift in the North American interior together with global cooling caused the expansion of aeolian deposition and placed similar evolutionary pressures on ephedras there, beginning in the latest Eocene and continuing across the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT). These climatic changes fundamentally altered the abundance and evolution of this ancient plant lineage on both continents and determined pollination mechanisms in the core clade of Ephedra today. Based on fossil evidence, this review demonstrates how climate change may have major and permanent impacts on plant-pollinator networks, as well as demonstrates possible evolutionary consequences of near-future climate scenarios for which we have no modern analogue.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.