Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotic medication after a first episode of psychosis

Alejandro G. Szmulewicz, Gonzalo Martínez-Alés, Roger Logan, Ridha Joober, Maria Ferrara, Christian Kelly, Diane Fredrikson, Lorna E. Thorpe, Sarah Conderino, Covadonga M. Díaz-Caneja, Vinod Srihari, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Deepak K. Sarpal, Ann K. Shinn, Celso Arango, Jai L. Shah, Dost Öngür, Miguel A. Hernán, on behalf of the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotic medication after a first episode of psychosis","authors":"Alejandro G. Szmulewicz, Gonzalo Martínez-Alés, Roger Logan, Ridha Joober, Maria Ferrara, Christian Kelly, Diane Fredrikson, Lorna E. Thorpe, Sarah Conderino, Covadonga M. Díaz-Caneja, Vinod Srihari, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Deepak K. Sarpal, Ann K. Shinn, Celso Arango, Jai L. Shah, Dost Öngür, Miguel A. Hernán, on behalf of the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration","doi":"10.1038/s44220-025-00407-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Switching to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic therapy as compared with continuation of oral therapy after a first episode of psychosis (FEP) may reduce the risk of relapse and hospitalization, as reported in some randomized trials. However, other trials and network meta-analyses reported no risk reduction. We emulated two target trials using data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration, an international consortium of observational cohorts of people with FEP. The first target trial was designed to ask a similar question as the European Long-Acting Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Trial (EULAST) trial, which compared the 18-month hospitalization risk between patients assigned to LAI therapy (aripiprazole, risperidone or paliperidone) and those on continuation of oral therapy. We benchmarked the observational estimates to those from the actual trial. The second target trial extended the first to examine the 3-year risks of psychotic relapses and in subgroups (prior relapses, non-adherence, substance use disorder). Of 2,228 individuals with FEP, 1,067 were eligible for the benchmarking analyses. Both our target trial emulation and EULAST showed little effect of LAI therapy initiation on the 18-month hospitalization risk. In the extended analysis (1,193 individuals), the 3-year risk difference of psychotic relapse comparing LAI therapy initiation with oral continuation was –7.0% (95% CI: –12.1, –0.7). The risk difference was substantially lower in subgroups with a prior relapse (–15.5%, 95%CI: –24.1, –5.5) or prior non-adherence (–21.9, 95% CI: –41.9, –2.0). We estimated that, compared with oral therapy continuation, LAI therapy initiation reduced psychotic relapses over 3 years. LAI therapy initiation may be particularly beneficial in vulnerable subgroups. This study reveals that in people with first episode of psychosis receiving oral antipsychotic medication, switching to long-acting injectable antipsychotic therapy may reduce psychotic relapses, especially in vulnerable subgroups, such as those with prior relapses or non-adherence to antipsychotic medication.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 4","pages":"421-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-025-00407-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Switching to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic therapy as compared with continuation of oral therapy after a first episode of psychosis (FEP) may reduce the risk of relapse and hospitalization, as reported in some randomized trials. However, other trials and network meta-analyses reported no risk reduction. We emulated two target trials using data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration, an international consortium of observational cohorts of people with FEP. The first target trial was designed to ask a similar question as the European Long-Acting Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Trial (EULAST) trial, which compared the 18-month hospitalization risk between patients assigned to LAI therapy (aripiprazole, risperidone or paliperidone) and those on continuation of oral therapy. We benchmarked the observational estimates to those from the actual trial. The second target trial extended the first to examine the 3-year risks of psychotic relapses and in subgroups (prior relapses, non-adherence, substance use disorder). Of 2,228 individuals with FEP, 1,067 were eligible for the benchmarking analyses. Both our target trial emulation and EULAST showed little effect of LAI therapy initiation on the 18-month hospitalization risk. In the extended analysis (1,193 individuals), the 3-year risk difference of psychotic relapse comparing LAI therapy initiation with oral continuation was –7.0% (95% CI: –12.1, –0.7). The risk difference was substantially lower in subgroups with a prior relapse (–15.5%, 95%CI: –24.1, –5.5) or prior non-adherence (–21.9, 95% CI: –41.9, –2.0). We estimated that, compared with oral therapy continuation, LAI therapy initiation reduced psychotic relapses over 3 years. LAI therapy initiation may be particularly beneficial in vulnerable subgroups. This study reveals that in people with first episode of psychosis receiving oral antipsychotic medication, switching to long-acting injectable antipsychotic therapy may reduce psychotic relapses, especially in vulnerable subgroups, such as those with prior relapses or non-adherence to antipsychotic medication.

Abstract Image

首次精神病发作后长效注射抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物的疗效比较
根据一些随机试验的报道,与首次精神病发作(FEP)后继续口服治疗相比,改用长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物治疗可能降低复发和住院的风险。然而,其他试验和网络荟萃分析报告没有降低风险。我们模拟了两个目标试验,使用来自FEP- causal协作组织的数据,该组织是FEP患者观察性队列的国际联盟。第一个目标试验的目的是提出与欧洲精神分裂症长效抗精神病药物试验(EULAST)相似的问题,该试验比较了分配给LAI治疗(阿立哌唑、利培酮或帕利哌酮)和继续口服治疗的患者18个月住院风险。我们将观察性估计与实际试验的估计进行基准比较。第二个目标试验扩展了第一个试验,以检查精神病复发的3年风险和亚组(既往复发,不依从性,物质使用障碍)。在2228名FEP患者中,有1067人符合基准分析的条件。我们的目标试验模拟和EULAST均显示LAI治疗开始对18个月住院风险的影响很小。在扩展分析(1193人)中,与口服继续治疗相比,LAI治疗开始与口服继续治疗的3年精神病复发风险差异为-7.0% (95% CI: -12.1, -0.7)。在既往复发(-15.5%,95%CI: -24.1, -5.5)或既往未依从性(-21.9,95%CI: -41.9, -2.0)的亚组中,风险差异显著降低。我们估计,与继续口服治疗相比,LAI治疗开始后3年内减少了精神病复发。LAI治疗开始可能对易感亚群特别有益。这项研究表明,在首次接受口服抗精神病药物治疗的精神病患者中,改用长效注射抗精神病药物治疗可能会减少精神病复发,特别是在易受伤害的亚群中,例如那些既往复发或未坚持服用抗精神病药物的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信