Reducing Air-Conditioning Load by Using an Insulating Material in Iraq as a Case Study (Experimental and Numerical)

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1002/htj.23211
Atif Ali Hasan, Omer Adil Zainal Al-Bayati, Noor Samir Lafta, Mahmood H. Khaleel
{"title":"Reducing Air-Conditioning Load by Using an Insulating Material in Iraq as a Case Study (Experimental and Numerical)","authors":"Atif Ali Hasan,&nbsp;Omer Adil Zainal Al-Bayati,&nbsp;Noor Samir Lafta,&nbsp;Mahmood H. Khaleel","doi":"10.1002/htj.23211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper has studied different types of walls using constant interior and exterior finishing materials (thermostone, 200-mm thick (A); fired clay bricks, 240-mm thick (B); hollow concrete blocks, 200-mm thick (C); solid concrete blocks, 140-mm thick (D); and limestone, 200-mm thick (E)) due to the availability of many different types of building materials in Iraq and the lack of control over the best use to demonstrate how each of these materials affects a building's insulation to deliver the appropriate levels of comfort and achieve the greatest possible reduction in the electrical energy needed for air conditioning. A unique chamber was created for performing the actual trials on such walls in their natural environment, which was the climate of the city of Baghdad (zip code 10016, 33° N latitude, 44° E longitude). The tests have been done both in their current state of operation and with the addition of thermal insulation (60-mm thick microfiber glass insulation material). The values for electricity consumption by a wall without insulation are 92, 121, 199, 148, and 138 kW/m<sup>2</sup>, in cases noted as A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1, respectively. However, when the insulator is used, the values become 58, 63, 51, 100, and 92 kW/m<sup>2</sup> for the cases noted as A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2, respectively. The percentage reduction in electrical energy consumed by the air conditioner used within the room with and without thermal insulation has been recorded in the range of 50%–65% and 25%–60%, respectively. Depending on the model used, and compared with the traditional model, the saving difference with and without insulation was 15% and 35%, respectively. The best case is C2, because it has no effect on the room's interior area. Also, the cooling load was less than in other cases; it was 51 kW/m<sup>2</sup> and had the highest building electrical savings, which are 65% when taking the wall in case C1 as a reference.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 3","pages":"2049-2062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper has studied different types of walls using constant interior and exterior finishing materials (thermostone, 200-mm thick (A); fired clay bricks, 240-mm thick (B); hollow concrete blocks, 200-mm thick (C); solid concrete blocks, 140-mm thick (D); and limestone, 200-mm thick (E)) due to the availability of many different types of building materials in Iraq and the lack of control over the best use to demonstrate how each of these materials affects a building's insulation to deliver the appropriate levels of comfort and achieve the greatest possible reduction in the electrical energy needed for air conditioning. A unique chamber was created for performing the actual trials on such walls in their natural environment, which was the climate of the city of Baghdad (zip code 10016, 33° N latitude, 44° E longitude). The tests have been done both in their current state of operation and with the addition of thermal insulation (60-mm thick microfiber glass insulation material). The values for electricity consumption by a wall without insulation are 92, 121, 199, 148, and 138 kW/m2, in cases noted as A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1, respectively. However, when the insulator is used, the values become 58, 63, 51, 100, and 92 kW/m2 for the cases noted as A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2, respectively. The percentage reduction in electrical energy consumed by the air conditioner used within the room with and without thermal insulation has been recorded in the range of 50%–65% and 25%–60%, respectively. Depending on the model used, and compared with the traditional model, the saving difference with and without insulation was 15% and 35%, respectively. The best case is C2, because it has no effect on the room's interior area. Also, the cooling load was less than in other cases; it was 51 kW/m2 and had the highest building electrical savings, which are 65% when taking the wall in case C1 as a reference.

本文对不同类型的墙体进行了研究,这些墙体使用的内外饰面材料各不相同(保温石,200 毫米厚(A);烧制粘土砖,240 毫米厚(B);空心混凝土砌块,200 毫米厚(C);实心混凝土砌块,140 毫米厚(D);由于伊拉克有许多不同类型的建筑材料,而且缺乏对最佳使用方法的控制,无法展示这些材料如何影响建筑物的隔热性能,从而提供适当的舒适度,并最大限度地减少空调所需的电能。我们创建了一个独特的试验室,用于在自然环境中对这些墙壁进行实际试验,自然环境就是巴格达市的气候(邮政编码 10016,北纬 33°,东经 44°)。试验既在其当前运行状态下进行,也在加装隔热材料(60 毫米厚的超细玻璃纤维隔热材料)后进行。在没有隔热材料的情况下,墙体的耗电量分别为 92、121、199、148 和 138 kW/m2,分别记为 A1、B1、C1、D1 和 E1。然而,当使用隔热材料时,在 A2、B2、C2、D2 和 E2 的情况下,数值分别为 58、63、51、100 和 92 千瓦/平方米。根据记录,使用隔热材料和不使用隔热材料的房间内空调消耗的电能分别减少了 50%-65%和 25%-60%。根据所使用的模式,与传统模式相比,使用和不使用隔热材料时的节能差异分别为 15%和 35%。最好的情况是 C2,因为它对房间的内部面积没有影响。此外,冷却负荷也比其他案例小;为 51 kW/m2,建筑节电率最高,以案例 C1 中的墙壁为参照,节电率为 65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信