Bioenergy Production From Sugarcane Straw: Implications for Soil-Related Ecosystem Services

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Carlos Roberto Pinheiro Junior, João Luís Nunes Carvalho, Lucas Pecci Canisares, Ricardo de Oliveira Bordonal, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
{"title":"Bioenergy Production From Sugarcane Straw: Implications for Soil-Related Ecosystem Services","authors":"Carlos Roberto Pinheiro Junior,&nbsp;João Luís Nunes Carvalho,&nbsp;Lucas Pecci Canisares,&nbsp;Ricardo de Oliveira Bordonal,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri,&nbsp;Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sugarcane straw removal for bioenergy production—especially second-generation ethanol—is shown to be a promising pathway for decarbonization. However, indiscriminate straw removal can negatively affect soil-related ecosystem services (SES), compromising the sustainability of the associated bioenergy production. Here, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to select and quantify the changes in agronomic and environmental indicators affected by low (≤ 1/3), moderate (&gt; 1/3 to ≤ 2/3), and high (&gt; 2/3) straw removal levels and the consequential impacts on eight SES. A quali-quantitative approach was developed to generate an impact matrix that provides the direction of the effects (negative, neutral, or positive) and the associated confidence levels. Overall, the lowest impact on SES occurs under low straw removal with a neutral effect on C storage, nutrient cycling, weed control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and provision of food and bioenergy. Water regulation, erosion control, and maintenance of soil biodiversity were the SES most negatively affected by straw removal. Moderate and high levels of straw removal negatively impact the maintenance of SES and compromise the sustainability of sugarcane cultivation areas, except for pest control and soil GHG emission mitigation. Finally, it was also discussed how the negative impacts of straw removal on SES could be mitigated or even reversed through the adoption of best management practices, such as cover crops, organic amendments, biological products (e.g., use of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi), reduced tillage, and machinery traffic control. Ultimately, the results of this study can be useful to guide decision-making by farmers, investors, stakeholders, and policymakers toward sustainable bioenergy production that contributes to a low-carbon economy and climate change mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sugarcane straw removal for bioenergy production—especially second-generation ethanol—is shown to be a promising pathway for decarbonization. However, indiscriminate straw removal can negatively affect soil-related ecosystem services (SES), compromising the sustainability of the associated bioenergy production. Here, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to select and quantify the changes in agronomic and environmental indicators affected by low (≤ 1/3), moderate (> 1/3 to ≤ 2/3), and high (> 2/3) straw removal levels and the consequential impacts on eight SES. A quali-quantitative approach was developed to generate an impact matrix that provides the direction of the effects (negative, neutral, or positive) and the associated confidence levels. Overall, the lowest impact on SES occurs under low straw removal with a neutral effect on C storage, nutrient cycling, weed control, greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, and provision of food and bioenergy. Water regulation, erosion control, and maintenance of soil biodiversity were the SES most negatively affected by straw removal. Moderate and high levels of straw removal negatively impact the maintenance of SES and compromise the sustainability of sugarcane cultivation areas, except for pest control and soil GHG emission mitigation. Finally, it was also discussed how the negative impacts of straw removal on SES could be mitigated or even reversed through the adoption of best management practices, such as cover crops, organic amendments, biological products (e.g., use of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi), reduced tillage, and machinery traffic control. Ultimately, the results of this study can be useful to guide decision-making by farmers, investors, stakeholders, and policymakers toward sustainable bioenergy production that contributes to a low-carbon economy and climate change mitigation.

Abstract Image

利用甘蔗秸秆生产生物能源:对土壤相关生态系统服务的影响
去除甘蔗秸秆用于生物能源生产——尤其是第二代乙醇——被证明是一种很有前途的脱碳途径。然而,不加选择地去除秸秆会对与土壤相关的生态系统服务(SES)产生负面影响,损害相关生物能源生产的可持续性。本文通过文献综述,选取并量化低(≤1/3)、中(>; 1/3至≤2/3)、高(> 2/3)秸秆去除水平对8种SES农艺和环境指标的影响及其对SES的影响。开发了一种质量定量方法,以产生一个影响矩阵,提供影响的方向(消极、中性或积极)和相关的置信水平。总体而言,低秸秆去除对SES的影响最小,对碳储存、养分循环、杂草控制、温室气体(GHG)缓解以及粮食和生物能源供应的影响为中性。秸秆去除对土壤水分调节、侵蚀控制和生物多样性维持的负面影响最大。除虫害防治和减少土壤温室气体排放外,中等和高水平的秸秆清除会对SES的维持产生负面影响,并损害甘蔗种植区的可持续性。最后,还讨论了如何通过采用最佳管理做法,如覆盖作物、有机改良剂、生物制品(如使用磷肥增溶菌和菌根真菌)、减少耕作和机械交通管制,减轻或甚至扭转秸秆去除对SES的负面影响。最终,本研究的结果可用于指导农民、投资者、利益相关者和决策者的决策,以实现可持续的生物能源生产,从而有助于低碳经济和减缓气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信