Human Skin Burn Intensity Resulting From Various Incidents Utilizing Bioheat Transfer Model: A Comparative Analogy

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1002/htj.23291
Md. Alamgir Hossain, R. Nasrin, Eid S. Alatawi
{"title":"Human Skin Burn Intensity Resulting From Various Incidents Utilizing Bioheat Transfer Model: A Comparative Analogy","authors":"Md. Alamgir Hossain,&nbsp;R. Nasrin,&nbsp;Eid S. Alatawi","doi":"10.1002/htj.23291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Understanding how human skin reacts to heat is vital for effective burn prevention and treatment. This study uses a bioheat transfer model to develop a comparative analogy to differentiate burn intensity from hot dishes, hot fluids, radiation, and flash fires, aiming to differentiate the burn profiles of each incident type. The finite element method is employed to solve the time-dependent Pennes' bioheat transport equation concerning the three distinct layers of human skin. The Arrhenius equation is implemented to quantify the damage fraction associated with thermal burns. The burn intensities for the degrees of burns (first, second, and third) are evaluated by applying Henriques burn integral, considering various burning conditions and the corresponding exposure times required for each burn. The numerical results are displayed in various formats, including volume temperature plots and line graphs of damage fraction. The findings reveal that first-degree burns occur the fastest, followed by second-degree burns, with third-degree burns taking the longest to develop. Notably, burns from direct contact with a hot dish are more severe than those from freely flowing heated fluids. The results highlight that exposure time, temperature, and thermal conductivity are key factors in burn depth and tissue damage, offering valuable insights for burn treatment and risk management. The outcomes will effectively predict burn consequences, making it useful in burn injury treatment and safety engineering.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 3","pages":"2326-2344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how human skin reacts to heat is vital for effective burn prevention and treatment. This study uses a bioheat transfer model to develop a comparative analogy to differentiate burn intensity from hot dishes, hot fluids, radiation, and flash fires, aiming to differentiate the burn profiles of each incident type. The finite element method is employed to solve the time-dependent Pennes' bioheat transport equation concerning the three distinct layers of human skin. The Arrhenius equation is implemented to quantify the damage fraction associated with thermal burns. The burn intensities for the degrees of burns (first, second, and third) are evaluated by applying Henriques burn integral, considering various burning conditions and the corresponding exposure times required for each burn. The numerical results are displayed in various formats, including volume temperature plots and line graphs of damage fraction. The findings reveal that first-degree burns occur the fastest, followed by second-degree burns, with third-degree burns taking the longest to develop. Notably, burns from direct contact with a hot dish are more severe than those from freely flowing heated fluids. The results highlight that exposure time, temperature, and thermal conductivity are key factors in burn depth and tissue damage, offering valuable insights for burn treatment and risk management. The outcomes will effectively predict burn consequences, making it useful in burn injury treatment and safety engineering.

了解人体皮肤对热的反应对于有效预防和治疗烧伤至关重要。本研究利用生物热传导模型进行比较类比,以区分热菜、热流体、辐射和闪火的烧伤强度,目的是区分每种事故类型的烧伤特征。该模型采用有限元法来求解与人体皮肤三个不同层相关的时间相关彭斯生物热传输方程。阿伦尼乌斯方程用于量化与热烧伤相关的损伤程度。通过应用亨里克斯灼伤积分,考虑各种灼伤条件和每种灼伤所需的相应暴露时间,对灼伤程度(第一、第二和第三灼伤)的灼伤强度进行评估。数值结果以各种形式显示,包括体积温度图和损伤分数折线图。研究结果表明,一级烧伤的发生速度最快,其次是二级烧伤,三级烧伤的发展时间最长。值得注意的是,与自由流动的加热液体相比,直接接触热盘子造成的烧伤更为严重。研究结果表明,暴露时间、温度和导热性是影响烧伤深度和组织损伤的关键因素,为烧伤治疗和风险管理提供了宝贵的见解。这些结果将有效预测烧伤后果,使其在烧伤治疗和安全工程中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信