Enabling participatory monitoring and evaluation: Insights for conservation practitioners and organizations

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Amanda Sigouin, Ana Luz Porzecanski, Erin Betley, Nadav Gazit, Peter Lichtenthal, Samantha H. Cheng, Pablo Pacheco, Shauna L. Mahajan
{"title":"Enabling participatory monitoring and evaluation: Insights for conservation practitioners and organizations","authors":"Amanda Sigouin,&nbsp;Ana Luz Porzecanski,&nbsp;Erin Betley,&nbsp;Nadav Gazit,&nbsp;Peter Lichtenthal,&nbsp;Samantha H. Cheng,&nbsp;Pablo Pacheco,&nbsp;Shauna L. Mahajan","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mounting environmental crises and the persistent factors driving them require a reconsideration of conservation approaches. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PME) is increasingly valued as a way for Indigenous peoples and local community actors to lead or engage in conservation activities that directly affect them. While research shows that PME can yield favorable outcomes for communities (e.g., knowledge co-production, social learning, and trust building) and for conservation, practical insights are scattered. Here we draw from the literature and discussions with professionals in the field to distill practical guidance for the design, implementation, and support of PME in conservation. This perspective highlights three themes for effective PME: navigating collaborations, working within local and diverse cultural contexts, and co-managing PME resources (including resources needed for PME and generated by PME). We recommend that practitioners and organizations, including our own, engage with these focal areas by reflecting on the purpose of PME, learning from relevant experiences, strengthening capacity for PME collaborations, and supporting PME through innovative and flexible financing. We see these actions as leverage points to promote effective PME and advance inclusive approaches to biodiversity conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mounting environmental crises and the persistent factors driving them require a reconsideration of conservation approaches. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PME) is increasingly valued as a way for Indigenous peoples and local community actors to lead or engage in conservation activities that directly affect them. While research shows that PME can yield favorable outcomes for communities (e.g., knowledge co-production, social learning, and trust building) and for conservation, practical insights are scattered. Here we draw from the literature and discussions with professionals in the field to distill practical guidance for the design, implementation, and support of PME in conservation. This perspective highlights three themes for effective PME: navigating collaborations, working within local and diverse cultural contexts, and co-managing PME resources (including resources needed for PME and generated by PME). We recommend that practitioners and organizations, including our own, engage with these focal areas by reflecting on the purpose of PME, learning from relevant experiences, strengthening capacity for PME collaborations, and supporting PME through innovative and flexible financing. We see these actions as leverage points to promote effective PME and advance inclusive approaches to biodiversity conservation.

Abstract Image

实现参与式监测和评估:对保护实践者和组织的见解
日益加剧的环境危机和造成危机的长期因素要求我们重新考虑保护方法。参与式监测与评估(PME)作为土著居民和当地社区行动者领导或参与直接影响他们的保护活动的一种方式,越来越受到重视。研究表明,参与式监测与评估可以为社区(如知识的共同生产、社会学习和信任的建立)和保护工作带来有利的结果,但实际的见解却很零散。在此,我们从文献资料以及与该领域专业人士的讨论中,提炼出了在保护中设计、实施和支持 PME 的实用指南。这一观点强调了有效的公众、教育和监测的三个主题:引导合作、在当地和不同的文化背景下工作以及共同管理公众、教育和监测资源(包括公众、教育和监测所需的资源和公众、教育和监测产生的资源)。我们建议从业人员和组织,包括我们自己的组织,参与这些重点领域的工作,反思私营教育和培训的目的,学习相关经验,加强私营教育和培训合作的能力,并通过创新和灵活的融资方式支持私营教育和培训。我们将这些行动视为杠杆点,以促进有效的方案、监测和评价,并推进生物多样性保护的包容性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信