Optimizing Minichannel Heat Sink Design: A Combined Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Inlet/Outlet Configurations and Pin Fin Enhancements

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1002/htj.23267
Hind Mahmood, Basim Freegah, Ahmad Muneer EL-Deen Faik, Qasim Saleh
{"title":"Optimizing Minichannel Heat Sink Design: A Combined Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Inlet/Outlet Configurations and Pin Fin Enhancements","authors":"Hind Mahmood,&nbsp;Basim Freegah,&nbsp;Ahmad Muneer EL-Deen Faik,&nbsp;Qasim Saleh","doi":"10.1002/htj.23267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present study investigated the effect of inlet location, counterflow and parallel flow configurations, and rib addition (pin fins) on the performance factor of minichannel heat sinks. Different rib spacings were investigated in Models D, E, and F, which are 5, 7, and 9 mm, respectively, all using counterflow. These models used ribs with a diameter of 1 mm. In addition, Models G and H were presented to explore different rib sizes (1.5 and 2 mm) while maintaining a rib spacing of 5 mm under counterflow conditions. All effects were studied numerically using ANSYS Fluent 19R3 under laminar coolant flow, with Reynolds numbers ranging from 1190 to 1900. The study also included fabricating two models: the conventional model and the optimized model, and comparing their results with the numerical results. The comparison indicated a satisfactory convergence between the experimental and numerical results. The results revealed that all modifications significantly improved the temperature distribution and overall performance factor (OPF). Model B outperformed the conventional model in terms of pressure drop and heat resistance, achieving improvements of 46% and 40%, respectively. Furthermore, Model D outperformed Model B in Nusselt number by 31.375%. Notably, Model D showed the highest OPF and most consistent core temperature among the models, confirming its status as the ideal design, with an OPF of 2 compared with the conventional model.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 3","pages":"1921-1939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of inlet location, counterflow and parallel flow configurations, and rib addition (pin fins) on the performance factor of minichannel heat sinks. Different rib spacings were investigated in Models D, E, and F, which are 5, 7, and 9 mm, respectively, all using counterflow. These models used ribs with a diameter of 1 mm. In addition, Models G and H were presented to explore different rib sizes (1.5 and 2 mm) while maintaining a rib spacing of 5 mm under counterflow conditions. All effects were studied numerically using ANSYS Fluent 19R3 under laminar coolant flow, with Reynolds numbers ranging from 1190 to 1900. The study also included fabricating two models: the conventional model and the optimized model, and comparing their results with the numerical results. The comparison indicated a satisfactory convergence between the experimental and numerical results. The results revealed that all modifications significantly improved the temperature distribution and overall performance factor (OPF). Model B outperformed the conventional model in terms of pressure drop and heat resistance, achieving improvements of 46% and 40%, respectively. Furthermore, Model D outperformed Model B in Nusselt number by 31.375%. Notably, Model D showed the highest OPF and most consistent core temperature among the models, confirming its status as the ideal design, with an OPF of 2 compared with the conventional model.

本研究调查了入口位置、逆流和平行流配置以及肋片添加(针状散热片)对微型通道散热器性能系数的影响。在模型 D、E 和 F 中研究了不同的肋条间距,分别为 5、7 和 9 毫米,均采用逆流。这些模型使用的肋片直径为 1 毫米。此外,还提出了模型 G 和 H,以探讨不同尺寸的肋条(1.5 毫米和 2 毫米),同时在逆流条件下保持 5 毫米的肋条间距。在层流冷却剂流动条件下,使用 ANSYS Fluent 19R3 对所有影响进行了数值研究,雷诺数范围为 1190 到 1900。研究还包括制作两个模型:传统模型和优化模型,并将其结果与数值结果进行比较。比较结果表明,实验结果和数值结果的趋同性令人满意。结果表明,所有修改都明显改善了温度分布和整体性能系数(OPF)。模型 B 在压降和热阻方面优于传统模型,分别提高了 46% 和 40%。此外,模型 D 的努塞尔特数比模型 B 高出 31.375%。值得注意的是,与传统模型相比,模型 D 的 OPF 值为 2,在所有模型中显示出最高的 OPF 值和最稳定的核心温度,证实了其作为理想设计的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信