Portfolio Scenarios for Interrelated Projects

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Vipin Agrawal;Jaya Singhal;Kalyan Singhal
{"title":"Portfolio Scenarios for Interrelated Projects","authors":"Vipin Agrawal;Jaya Singhal;Kalyan Singhal","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3548532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most papers on the selection of portfolios of interrelated projects employ mixed-integer programming optimization, data envelopment analysis, and heuristics, along with a few other methods. Although optimizing models do allow the user to find both the optimal and other solutions through sensitivity analysis, they tend to exclude portfolios that might be more desirable because of a combination of quantitative and qualitative criteria. For all practical purposes, these methods do not consider the entire set of <italic>possible</i> portfolios, which could be or is assumed to be large. These possible portfolios consist of two groups: those that are not feasible because of mutually exclusive relationships between projects and those that are feasible. Our focus in this article is to identify all feasible portfolios such that the resulting set does not include any portfolio that contains projects with mutually exclusive relationships. We deploy a compatibility matrix that incorporates both the complex interactions and the extent to which projects are mutually exclusive or mutually complementary. We then generate a complete and inclusive set of project portfolio scenarios in which no single portfolio contains mutually exclusive projects. The resulting set generally has a manageable number of project portfolios. We then analyze the complete spectrum of project interactions with mutual exclusivity at one end, complete complementarity at the other, and project independence at the midpoint. Our deceptively simple method can stand alone or be used in conjunction with almost any of the existing methods. This article describes our innovative conceptual framework, which we believe could exert broad influence over managerial practice.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1154-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10912654/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most papers on the selection of portfolios of interrelated projects employ mixed-integer programming optimization, data envelopment analysis, and heuristics, along with a few other methods. Although optimizing models do allow the user to find both the optimal and other solutions through sensitivity analysis, they tend to exclude portfolios that might be more desirable because of a combination of quantitative and qualitative criteria. For all practical purposes, these methods do not consider the entire set of possible portfolios, which could be or is assumed to be large. These possible portfolios consist of two groups: those that are not feasible because of mutually exclusive relationships between projects and those that are feasible. Our focus in this article is to identify all feasible portfolios such that the resulting set does not include any portfolio that contains projects with mutually exclusive relationships. We deploy a compatibility matrix that incorporates both the complex interactions and the extent to which projects are mutually exclusive or mutually complementary. We then generate a complete and inclusive set of project portfolio scenarios in which no single portfolio contains mutually exclusive projects. The resulting set generally has a manageable number of project portfolios. We then analyze the complete spectrum of project interactions with mutual exclusivity at one end, complete complementarity at the other, and project independence at the midpoint. Our deceptively simple method can stand alone or be used in conjunction with almost any of the existing methods. This article describes our innovative conceptual framework, which we believe could exert broad influence over managerial practice.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信